These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37276128)

  • 41. Procedural learning of semantic categorization: a study of 110 non-disabled individuals.
    Arroyo-Anlló EM; Ingrand P; Gil R
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2007 Nov; 2(6):366-74. PubMed ID: 19263567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Crossmodal correspondences between odors and contingent features: odors, musical notes, and geometrical shapes.
    Deroy O; Crisinel AS; Spence C
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Oct; 20(5):878-96. PubMed ID: 23463615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The semantic basis of taste-shape associations.
    Velasco C; Woods AT; Marks LE; Cheok AD; Spence C
    PeerJ; 2016; 4():e1644. PubMed ID: 26966646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of grammaticality in artificial grammar learning.
    Topolinski S; Strack F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):39-63. PubMed ID: 19203169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Getting connected: Both associative and semantic links structure semantic memory for newly learned persons.
    Wiese H; Schweinberger SR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(11):2131-48. PubMed ID: 25607929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The neural consequences of semantic richness: when more comes to mind, less activation is observed.
    Pexman PM; Hargreaves IS; Edwards JD; Henry LC; Goodyear BG
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):401-6. PubMed ID: 17576279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Learning global dependencies and multi-semantics within heterogeneous graph for predicting disease-related lncRNAs.
    Xuan P; Wang S; Cui H; Zhao Y; Zhang T; Wu P
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36088549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Does the semantic content of verbal categories influence categorical perception? An ERP study.
    Maier M; Glage P; Hohlfeld A; Abdel Rahman R
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():1-10. PubMed ID: 25163810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. People With High Autistic Traits Show Fewer Consensual Crossmodal Correspondences Between Visual Features and Tastes.
    Chen N; Watanabe K; Wada M
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714277. PubMed ID: 34566793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Affective semantic priming in patients with schizophrenia.
    Rossell SL
    Psychiatry Res; 2004 Dec; 129(3):221-8. PubMed ID: 15661315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Semantic and affective representations of valence: Prediction of autonomic and facial responses from feelings-focused and knowledge-focused self-reports.
    Hamzani O; Mazar T; Itkes O; Petranker R; Kron A
    Emotion; 2020 Apr; 20(3):486-500. PubMed ID: 30714777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Does your past define you? The role of previous visual experience in subjective reactions to new affective pictures and sounds.
    Del Popolo Cristaldi F; Gambarota F; Oosterwijk S
    Emotion; 2023 Aug; 23(5):1317-1333. PubMed ID: 36074619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test.
    Parise CV; Spence C
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 220(3-4):319-33. PubMed ID: 22706551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Modulation of the inter-hemispheric processing of semantic information during normal aging. A divided visual field experiment.
    Hoyau E; Cousin E; Jaillard A; Baciu M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt B):425-436. PubMed ID: 26724229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall.
    Acheson DJ; MacDonald MC; Postle BR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jan; 37(1):44-59. PubMed ID: 21058880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Crossmodal correspondences and interactions between texture and taste perception.
    Pistolas E; Wagemans J
    Iperception; 2023; 14(2):20416695231163473. PubMed ID: 37020456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Associative and similarity-based processes in categorization decisions.
    Hampton JA
    Mem Cognit; 1997 Sep; 25(5):625-40. PubMed ID: 9337581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Phasic affective modulation of semantic priming.
    Topolinski S; Deutsch R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):414-36. PubMed ID: 22732031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Semantic categorization precedes affective evaluation of visual scenes.
    Nummenmaa L; Hyönä J; Calvo MG
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):222-46. PubMed ID: 20438250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. How does meaning come to mind? Four broad principles of semantic processing.
    Pexman PM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2020 Dec; 74(4):275-283. PubMed ID: 33104379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.