BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3727681)

  • 1. Reoperations of the mitral and aortic valves.
    Antunes MJ; Magalhães MP; Azevedo MG; Baptista AL; Kinsley RH
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():163-7. PubMed ID: 3727681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The timing of prosthetic valve reoperations based on an analysis of risk factors.
    Butchart EG; Breckenridge IM
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():155-9. PubMed ID: 3727679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Artificial heart valves and intravascular hemolysis].
    Mezger J; Weinhold C; Kreuzer E; Erdmann E
    Internist (Berl); 1988 Nov; 29(11):781-3. PubMed ID: 3069791
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
    Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
    Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Long-term results following heart valve replacement with the Omniscience prosthesis: can heart valve replacement with this prosthesis be recommended?].
    Minami K; Ohlmeier H; Körner MM; Gleichmann U; Körfer R
    Helv Chir Acta; 1987 Nov; 54(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 3436817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Porcine aortic vs. bovine pericardial valves: a morphologic study of the Xenomedica and Mitroflow bioprostheses.
    Goffin YA; Bartik MA; Hilbert SL
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():213-22. PubMed ID: 3727689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In response to: Gometza B, Kumar N, Prabhakar G, Galio R, Kandeel M, Duran CMG. The challenge of valve surgery in a developing population.
    Antunes MJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Jul; 2(4):487-9. PubMed ID: 8269155
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Up to nine-years' experience with the Allcarbon prosthetic heart valve.
    Ho TH; Van Nguyen P; Phan PK; Pham VN
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):512-7. PubMed ID: 16116878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Valve adaptation as a cause of disc opening reduction in mechanical heart valves: the case of the Lillehei-Kaster valve.
    Montorsi P; Teruzzi G; Calligaris G; Cavoretto D
    Ital Heart J; 2003 Feb; 4(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 12762278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Long-term results after mitral and aortic valve replacement in childhood and adolescence.
    Rupprath G; Franke F; Vogt J; de Vivie ER
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():312-6. PubMed ID: 2425503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The risk of reoperation in acquired valvular heart disease.
    Rodewald G; Guntau J; Bantea C; Kalmar P; Krebber HJ; Rödiger W; Tilsner V
    Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Apr; 28(2):77-88. PubMed ID: 6156504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term durability of the pericardial valve.
    Ionescu MI
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():207-12. PubMed ID: 3727688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis--new generation biological valve.
    Jamieson WR; Gerein AN; Tyers GF; Allen P; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Janusz MT; Burr LH
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():245-50. PubMed ID: 3727695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Bioprosthesis degeneration in the aortic and mitral valve position. Results and problems from the cardiosurgical viewpoint].
    Antretter H; Cottogni M; Falbesoner C; Furtwängler W; Mair P; Falk M; Hutter J
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1993; 143(11):281-7. PubMed ID: 8212714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
    Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Replacement of mitral, aortic, and pulmonary valves for rheumatic heart disease.
    Hilgenberg AD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979 Feb; 77(2):297-300. PubMed ID: 762971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.