136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3727689)
1. Porcine aortic vs. bovine pericardial valves: a morphologic study of the Xenomedica and Mitroflow bioprostheses.
Goffin YA; Bartik MA; Hilbert SL
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():213-22. PubMed ID: 3727689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular porcine bioprosthesis--new generation biological valve.
Jamieson WR; Gerein AN; Tyers GF; Allen P; Munro AI; Miyagishima RT; Janusz MT; Burr LH
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():245-50. PubMed ID: 3727695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The timing of prosthetic valve reoperations based on an analysis of risk factors.
Butchart EG; Breckenridge IM
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():155-9. PubMed ID: 3727679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Late follow-up of the flexible stent, low profile Liotta bioprosthesis.
Navia JA; Belzzitti J; Meletti J; Liotta D
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():254-7. PubMed ID: 3727697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reoperations of the mitral and aortic valves.
Antunes MJ; Magalhães MP; Azevedo MG; Baptista AL; Kinsley RH
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():163-7. PubMed ID: 3727681
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-term durability of the pericardial valve.
Ionescu MI
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():207-12. PubMed ID: 3727688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Five-years actuarial analysis after heart valve replacement with the St. Jude medical prosthesis.
Fraedrich G; Höge R; Fiedler R; Hehrlein FW
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():282-5. PubMed ID: 3727702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in young patients.
Vouhé PR; Milano A; Leca F; Neveux JY
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():289-92. PubMed ID: 3727704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mode of failure of the Mitroflow pericardial valve.
Leandri J; Bertrand P; Mazzucotelli JP; Loisance D
J Heart Valve Dis; 1992 Nov; 1(2):225-31. PubMed ID: 1341633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low profile bioprostheses for mitral valve replacement.
Romano M; Sigal R; Lorente P; Piwnica A
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():305-7. PubMed ID: 3727708
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Patterns of failure in Hancock pericardial bioprostheses.
Walley VM; Rubens FD; Campagna M; Pipe AL; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Aug; 102(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 1865694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Valve failure caused by cusp tears in low-profile Ionescu-Shiley bovine pericardial bioprosthetic valves.
Walley VM; Bédard P; Brais M; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Apr; 93(4):583-6. PubMed ID: 3550298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Emergency heart valve operations in acute infectious endocarditis].
Genoni M; von Segesser LK; Kuhrmeier A; Turina M
Helv Chir Acta; 1991 Jan; 57(4):605-9. PubMed ID: 2050532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis.
Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Marszal-Marciniak M; Rafalska K; Zasłonka J; Moll J
Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():191-5. PubMed ID: 3727685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Results of reoperation for primary tissue failure of porcine bioprostheses.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Valfré C; Talenti E; Guerra F; Thiene G; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Oct; 90(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 4046622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The behavior of pericardial versus porcine valve xenografts in the growing sheep model.
Gallo I; Nistal F; Artiñano E; Fernández D; Cayón R; Carrión M; García-Martínez V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):281-90. PubMed ID: 3807402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
