These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3727690)

  • 21. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of experience with the Hancock and Ionescu-Shiley low-profile pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reece IJ; Fisher J; Sethia B; MacArthur KJ; Wheatley DJ
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():232-6. PubMed ID: 3727691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Labcor-stented porcine heart valve prosthesis in laboratory testing in accordance with prEN 12006-1].
    Hüsgen P; Wirtz RJ; Köhler JC
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1998; 43 Suppl():386-7. PubMed ID: 9859411
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Holographic interferometry and in vitro calcification: comparing pericardial versus porcine bioprostheses.
    Deiwick M; Glasmacher B; Tjan DT; Reul H; von Bally G; Scheld HH
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Jul; 7(4):419-27. PubMed ID: 9697065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Design aspects and hydrodynamic characteristics of the Bionics heart valves].
    Fursov BA; Kartoshkin VM; Gorshkov IuV; Zaĭtsev LV; Evdokimov SV; Mel'nikov AP; Zaĭtsev VV
    Med Tekh; 1990; (6):32-5. PubMed ID: 2290376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach.
    Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Prosthetic valve function under simulated low cardiac output conditions: preliminary observations.
    Bodnar E; Reul H; Schmitz B
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 May; 2(3):348-51. PubMed ID: 8269131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bioprostheses for cardiac valve replacement.
    Jamieson WR
    Can J Surg; 1985 Nov; 28(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 4063890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Laboratory assessment of the design, function, and durability of pericardial bioprostheses.
    Fisher J; Reece IJ; Jack GR; Cathcart L; Wheatley DJ
    Eng Med; 1987 Apr; 16(2):105-9. PubMed ID: 2957250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Low profile bioprostheses for mitral valve replacement.
    Romano M; Sigal R; Lorente P; Piwnica A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():305-7. PubMed ID: 3727708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of design on bioprosthetic valve durability.
    Vesely I
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 11921660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bioprosthetic valvular failure. Clinical and pathological observations in an experimental animal model.
    Barnhart GR; Jones M; Ishihara T; Chavez AM; Rose DM; Ferrans VJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1982 Apr; 83(4):618-31. PubMed ID: 7062773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Characteristic resistance curves of aortic valve substitutes facilitate individualized decision for a particular type.
    Kuehnel RU; Puchner R; Pohl A; Wendt MO; Hartrumpf M; Pohl M; Albes JM
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):450-5; discussion 455. PubMed ID: 15740954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effect of prosthesis-patient mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status.
    Pibarot P; Honos GN; Durand LG; Dumesnil JG
    Can J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 12(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 8608457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Durability of pericardial versus porcine aortic valves.
    Gao G; Wu Y; Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Starr A
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jul; 44(2):384-8. PubMed ID: 15261935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of design and fixation pressure on fibrous sheathing in right-sided porcine aortic bioprostheses.
    Ozaki S; Herijgers P; Verbeken E; Meuris B; Ypermann J; Flameng W
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 13(4 Suppl 1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11805941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Hydrodynamic studies of normal and pathologically changed bioprostheses in the aortic position].
    Heiliger R; Richter H; Mittermayer C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 1985 Sep; 30(9):209-14. PubMed ID: 4052553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S; Eichinger WB; Wagner I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.