These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3727692)
1. Does pericardial thickness guarantee a homogeneous bioprosthetic product? Evaluation of modification in the physical characteristics of bovine pericardium exposed to pressure stress test. Mikus PM; Arpesella G; Gargiulo G; Cirillo M; Marrozzini C; Pierangeli V; Pierangeli A Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():237-40. PubMed ID: 3727692 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve. Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of design on bioprosthetic valve durability. Vesely I J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 11921660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kangaroo xenobioprostheses--an advantage in heart valve replacement. Weinhold C; Weingartner J; Adt M; Peters D; Reichart B; Kreuzer E; Gokel JM; Hammer C Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():251-3. PubMed ID: 3727696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of pressure- and volume-loss of technical and biological heart valve prostheses. Köhler J Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():272-6. PubMed ID: 3727699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioprostheses are superior to mechanical prostheses. Jamieson WR Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():258-71. PubMed ID: 3727698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology. Schoen FJ Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses. Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves? Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The failure modes of biological prosthetic heart valves. Butany J; Leask R J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2001; 11(3-4):115-35. PubMed ID: 11921659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of pannus in the longevity of an Ionescu-Shiley pericardial bioprosthesis. Butany JW; Kesarwani R; Yau TM; Singh G; Thangaroopan M; Nair V; Leong SW J Card Surg; 2006; 21(5):505-7. PubMed ID: 16948773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The pulmonary bioprosthetic heart valve: its unsuitability for use as an aortic valve replacement. Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Booth C; Watterson KG; Fisher J J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):668-78; discussion 679. PubMed ID: 12358404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac valve replacement: a bioengineering approach. Korossis SA; Fisher J; Ingham E Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):83-124. PubMed ID: 11086842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]