These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3727698)

  • 1. Bioprostheses are superior to mechanical prostheses.
    Jamieson WR
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():258-71. PubMed ID: 3727698
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Haemodynamic evaluation of the Hancock bovine pericardial heart valve.
    Weingartner J; Kreuzer E; Weinhold C; Reichart B; Peters D; Erdmann E
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():241-4. PubMed ID: 3727694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The special problems of the patient with a valvular prosthesis.
    Frankl WS
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1986; 16(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 3742533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The first step to understanding valve failure: an overview of pathology.
    Schoen FJ
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S50-3. PubMed ID: 1389279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Are bioprostheses superior to mechanical valves?
    Schön HR; Unger B; Weingartner F; Sebening H; Blömer H
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():286-8. PubMed ID: 3727703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The increasing use of mechanical pulmonary valve replacement over a 40-year period.
    Stulak JM; Dearani JA; Burkhart HM; Connolly HM; Warnes CA; Suri RM; Schaff HV
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Dec; 90(6):2009-14; discussion 2014-5. PubMed ID: 21095354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term prognosis following valvular heart surgery.
    Winters WL; Samuels DA
    Cardiovasc Clin; 1986; 16(2):437-505. PubMed ID: 3488808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kangaroo xenobioprostheses--an advantage in heart valve replacement.
    Weinhold C; Weingartner J; Adt M; Peters D; Reichart B; Kreuzer E; Gokel JM; Hammer C
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():251-3. PubMed ID: 3727696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.
    Prasongsukarn K; Jamieson WR; Lichtenstein SV
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):501-8, 510-1; discussion 509. PubMed ID: 16116877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low profile bioprostheses for mitral valve replacement.
    Romano M; Sigal R; Lorente P; Piwnica A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():305-7. PubMed ID: 3727708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of pregnancy after bioprosthetic valve replacement in young women: a prospective five-year study.
    Avila WS; Rossi EG; Grinberg M; Ramires JA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):864-9. PubMed ID: 12479290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Late complications following heart valve replacement].
    Niederer W
    Fortschr Med; 1984 Nov; 102(42):1077-81. PubMed ID: 6510859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of long-term clinical follow-up after aortic or mitral valve replacement with Björk-Shiley tilting disc prostheses or tissue valves.
    Mudra H; Kraus F; Wellnhofer E; Hall D; Rudolph W
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():277-81. PubMed ID: 3727700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing thromboembolism after mitral prosthetic implants.
    Rábago G; Fraile J; Martinell J; Artiz V; Cortina J
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():341-4. PubMed ID: 2425504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Six-and-half years' experience with the St. Jude BioImplant porcine prosthesis.
    Triggiani M; D'Ancona G; Nascimbene S; Benussi S; Donatelli F; Paolini G; Galli L; Grossi A
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9130121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the Ross operation fulfil the objective performance criteria established for new prosthetic heart valves?
    Moidl R; Simon P; Aschauer C; Chevtchik O; Kupilik N; Rödler S; Wolner E; Laufer G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 10772035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does pericardial thickness guarantee a homogeneous bioprosthetic product? Evaluation of modification in the physical characteristics of bovine pericardium exposed to pressure stress test.
    Mikus PM; Arpesella G; Gargiulo G; Cirillo M; Marrozzini C; Pierangeli V; Pierangeli A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():237-40. PubMed ID: 3727692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy in women with valvular prostheses--follow-up observations.
    Pajszczyk-Kieszkiewicz T; Krzemińska-Pakuła M; Kowalska-Koprek U; Zasłonka J; Zasłonka A
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():308-11. PubMed ID: 3727709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Choice of heart valve prosthesis--1985].
    Borst HG; Frank G; Frimpong-Boateng K; Bednarski P
    Z Kardiol; 1986 Jun; 75(6):311-5. PubMed ID: 3751217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
    Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.