179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37277057)
1. OECD harmonised template 201: Structuring and reporting mechanistic information to foster the integration of new approach methodologies for hazard and risk assessment of chemicals.
Carnesecchi E; Langezaal I; Browne P; Batista-Leite S; Campia I; Coecke S; Dagallier B; Deceuninck P; Dorne JLC; Tarazona JV; Le Goff F; Leinala E; Morath S; Munn S; Richardson J; Paini A; Wittwehr C
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2023 Aug; 142():105426. PubMed ID: 37277057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. EFSA's OpenFoodTox: An open source toxicological database on chemicals in food and feed and its future developments.
Dorne JLCM; Richardson J; Livaniou A; Carnesecchi E; Ceriani L; Baldin R; Kovarich S; Pavan M; Saouter E; Biganzoli F; Pasinato L; Zare Jeddi M; Robinson TP; Kass GEN; Liem AKD; Toropov AA; Toropova AP; Yang C; Tarkhov A; Georgiadis N; Di Nicola MR; Mostrag A; Verhagen H; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E; Bassan A
Environ Int; 2021 Jan; 146():106293. PubMed ID: 33395940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sourcing data on chemical properties and hazard data from the US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard: A practical guide for human risk assessment.
Williams AJ; Lambert JC; Thayer K; Dorne JCM
Environ Int; 2021 Sep; 154():106566. PubMed ID: 33934018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accelerating the Pace of Chemical Risk Assessment.
Kavlock RJ; Bahadori T; Barton-Maclaren TS; Gwinn MR; Rasenberg M; Thomas RS
Chem Res Toxicol; 2018 May; 31(5):287-290. PubMed ID: 29600706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development of a next generation risk assessment framework for the evaluation of skin sensitisation of cosmetic ingredients.
Gilmour N; Kern PS; Alépée N; Boislève F; Bury D; Clouet E; Hirota M; Hoffmann S; Kühnl J; Lalko JF; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Nishida H; Osmani A; Petersohn D; Sekine S; van Vliet E; Klaric M
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2020 Oct; 116():104721. PubMed ID: 32645429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A high-level overview of the OECD AOP Development Programme.
Chauhan V; Hamada N; Wilkins R; Garnier-Laplace J; Laurier D; Beaton D; Tollefsen KE
Int J Radiat Biol; 2022; 98(12):1704-1713. PubMed ID: 35938955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Human biomonitoring and toxicokinetics as key building blocks for next generation risk assessment.
Reale E; Zare Jeddi M; Paini A; Connolly A; Duca R; Cubadda F; Benfenati E; Bessems J; S Galea K; Dirven H; Santonen T; M Koch H; Jones K; Sams C; Viegas S; Kyriaki M; Campisi L; David A; Antignac JP; B Hopf N
Environ Int; 2024 Feb; 184():108474. PubMed ID: 38350256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. NAM-supported read-across: From case studies to regulatory guidance in safety assessment.
Rovida C; Escher SE; Herzler M; Bennekou SH; Kamp H; Kroese DE; Maslankiewicz L; Moné MJ; Patlewicz G; Sipes N; Van Aerts L; White A; Yamada T; Van de Water B
ALTEX; 2021; 38(1):140-150. PubMed ID: 33452529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Standardisation and international adoption of defined approaches for skin sensitisation.
Casati S; Asturiol D; Browne P; Kleinstreuer N; Régimbald-Krnel M; Therriault P
Front Toxicol; 2022; 4():943152. PubMed ID: 36032790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. COSMOS next generation - A public knowledge base leveraging chemical and biological data to support the regulatory assessment of chemicals.
Yang C; Cronin MTD; Arvidson KB; Bienfait B; Enoch SJ; Heldreth B; Hobocienski B; Muldoon-Jacobs K; Lan Y; Madden JC; Magdziarz T; Marusczyk J; Mostrag A; Nelms M; Neagu D; Przybylak K; Rathman JF; Park J; Richarz AN; Richard AM; Ribeiro JV; Sacher O; Schwab C; Vitcheva V; Volarath P; Worth AP
Comput Toxicol; 2021 Aug; 19():100175. PubMed ID: 34405124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Current status and future challenges of genotoxicity OECD Test Guidelines for nanomaterials: a workshop report.
Doak SH; Andreoli C; Burgum MJ; Chaudhry Q; Bleeker EAJ; Bossa C; Domenech J; Drobne D; Fessard V; Jeliazkova N; Longhin E; Rundén-Pran E; Stępnik M; El Yamani N; Catalán J; Dusinska M
Mutagenesis; 2023 Aug; 38(4):183-191. PubMed ID: 37234002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refinement of biodegradation tests methodologies and the proposed utility of new microbial ecology techniques.
Kowalczyk A; Martin TJ; Price OR; Snape JR; van Egmond RA; Finnegan CJ; Schäfer H; Davenport RJ; Bending GD
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2015 Jan; 111():9-22. PubMed ID: 25450910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Towards grouping concepts based on new approach methodologies in chemical hazard assessment: the read-across approach of the EU-ToxRisk project.
Escher SE; Kamp H; Bennekou SH; Bitsch A; Fisher C; Graepel R; Hengstler JG; Herzler M; Knight D; Leist M; Norinder U; Ouédraogo G; Pastor M; Stuard S; White A; Zdrazil B; van de Water B; Kroese D
Arch Toxicol; 2019 Dec; 93(12):3643-3667. PubMed ID: 31781791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of a defined approach based on a stacking prediction model to identify skin sensitization hazard.
Tourneix F; Alépée N; Detroyer A; Eilstein J; Martinozzi Teissier S; Nardelli L; Noçairi H; Pauloin T; Piroird C; Del Bufalo A
Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Oct; 60():134-143. PubMed ID: 31100378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safer chemicals using less animals: kick-off of the European ONTOX project.
Vinken M; Benfenati E; Busquet F; Castell J; Clevert DA; de Kok TM; Dirven H; Fritsche E; Geris L; Gozalbes R; Hartung T; Jennen D; Jover R; Kandarova H; Kramer N; Krul C; Luechtefeld T; Masereeuw R; Roggen E; Schaller S; Vanhaecke T; Yang C; Piersma AH
Toxicology; 2021 Jun; 458():152846. PubMed ID: 34216698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Applying the skin sensitisation adverse outcome pathway (AOP) to quantitative risk assessment.
Maxwell G; MacKay C; Cubberley R; Davies M; Gellatly N; Glavin S; Gouin T; Jacquoilleot S; Moore C; Pendlington R; Saib O; Sheffield D; Stark R; Summerfield V
Toxicol In Vitro; 2014 Feb; 28(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 24184331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Is fish embryo test (FET) according to OECD 236 sensible enough for delivering quality data for effluent risk assessment?
Stelzer JAA; Rosin CK; Bauer LH; Hartmann M; Pulgati FH; Arenzon A
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2925-2932. PubMed ID: 29926976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of industrial chemicals and pesticides for effects on human health.
Stucki AO; Barton-Maclaren TS; Bhuller Y; Henriquez JE; Henry TR; Hirn C; Miller-Holt J; Nagy EG; Perron MM; Ratzlaff DE; Stedeford TJ; Clippinger AJ
Front Toxicol; 2022; 4():964553. PubMed ID: 36119357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
