These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37277692)

  • 1. For Better and For Worse: Frequent Gamblers Use Dual Counterfactuals to Justify Continued Gambling.
    Anthony CI; Cowley E; Blaszczynski A
    J Gambl Stud; 2023 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 37277692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of belief in good luck and counterfactual thinking on gambling behavior.
    Kim SR; Kwon YS; Hyun MH
    J Behav Addict; 2015 Dec; 4(4):236-43. PubMed ID: 26690618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gambling despite financial loss-the role of losses disguised as wins in multi-line slots.
    Graydon C; Dixon MJ; Stange M; Fugelsang JA
    Addiction; 2019 Jan; 114(1):119-124. PubMed ID: 30063273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Promoting Adolescent Safer Gambling Through Self-Referent Counterfactual Thinking and Knowledge of Probabilistic Outcome.
    Awo LO
    J Gambl Stud; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 38995517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Looking on the bright side: downward counterfactual thinking in response to negative life events.
    White K; Lehman DR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Oct; 31(10):1413-24. PubMed ID: 16143672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Carry on winning: the gamblers' fallacy creates hot hand effects in online gambling.
    Xu J; Harvey N
    Cognition; 2014 May; 131(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 24549140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do losses disguised as wins create a "sweet spot" for win overestimates in multiline slots play?
    Graydon C; Dixon MJ; Gutierrez J; Stange M; Larche CJ; Kruger TB
    Addict Behav; 2021 Jan; 112():106598. PubMed ID: 32889441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Counterfactual Nature of Gambling Near-misses: An Experimental Study.
    Wu Y; van Dijk E; Li H; Aitken M; Clark L
    J Behav Decis Mak; 2017 Oct; 30(4):855-868. PubMed ID: 29081596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should I have been more careful or less careless? The comparative nature of counterfactual thoughts alters judgments of their impact.
    Woltin KA; Epstude K
    Cognition; 2023 Jun; 235():105402. PubMed ID: 36801604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Experiencing a significant win and its sociodemographic and motivational predictors: A comparative analysis of pure-chance gamblers from Poland and France.
    Lelonek-Kuleta B; Bartczuk RP; Tovar ML; Benoit E; Costes JM
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(11):e0277972. PubMed ID: 36409760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the autonomic arousal of frequent, infrequent and non-gamblers while playing fruit machines.
    Moodie C; Finnigan F
    Addiction; 2005 Jan; 100(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 15598192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mediating Role of Impulsivity in the Contributory Roles of Upward Versus Downward Counterfactual Thinking in Youth Gambling Intention.
    Awo LO; Amazue LO; Eze VC; Ekwe CN
    J Gambl Stud; 2023 Mar; 39(1):33-48. PubMed ID: 35246753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The desire to gamble: the influence of outcomes on the priming effects of a gambling episode.
    Young MM; Wohl MJ; Matheson K; Baumann S; Anisman H
    J Gambl Stud; 2008 Sep; 24(3):275-93. PubMed ID: 18330680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dispositional optimism weakly predicts upward, rather than downward, counterfactual thinking: A prospective correlational study using episodic recall.
    Gamlin J; Smallman R; Epstude K; Roese NJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0237644. PubMed ID: 32797102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving workplace safety by thinking about what might have been: A first look at the role of counterfactual thinking.
    He Y; Payne SC; Yao X; Smallman R
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():153-164. PubMed ID: 32199558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Near-wins and near-losses in gambling: a behavioral and facial EMG study.
    Wu Y; van Dijk E; Clark L
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Mar; 52(3):359-66. PubMed ID: 25234840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory for future gambling wins.
    Scoboria A; Wilson T
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2011 Sep; 25(3):565-72. PubMed ID: 21443304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequent gamblers' perceptions of the role of gambling marketing in their behaviour: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.
    Houghton S; Punton G; Casey E; McNeill A; Moss M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(6):e0287393. PubMed ID: 37327226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Imagining What Could Have Happened: Types and Vividness of Counterfactual Thoughts and the Relationship With Post-traumatic Stress Reactions.
    Blix I; Kanten AB; Birkeland MS; Thoresen S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():515. PubMed ID: 29731729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Polarized imagination: partisanship influences the direction and consequences of counterfactual thinking.
    Epstude K; Effron DA; Roese NJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 377(1866):20210342. PubMed ID: 36314153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.