157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37277728)
1. A qualitative study examining the critical differences in the experience of and response to formative feedback by undergraduate medical students in Japan and the UK.
Kozato A; Shikino K; Matsuyama Y; Hayashi M; Kondo S; Uchida S; Stanyon M; Ito S
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Jun; 23(1):408. PubMed ID: 37277728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. From Grading to Assessment for Learning: A Qualitative Study of Student Perceptions Surrounding Elimination of Core Clerkship Grades and Enhanced Formative Feedback.
Seligman L; Abdullahi A; Teherani A; Hauer KE
Teach Learn Med; 2021; 33(3):314-325. PubMed ID: 33228392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of outcomes of a formative objective structured clinical examination for second-year UK medical students.
Chisnall B; Vince T; Hall S; Tribe R
Int J Med Educ; 2015 Jun; 6():76-83. PubMed ID: 26094249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.
Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):293. PubMed ID: 27846882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical Students' Integration of Formative Feedback During Simulation: A Grounded Theory Study.
Cole R; Garrigan AG; Peters SA; Tilley L; Conley SP; Schwartz J; Vojta L; Rudinsky SL
Mil Med; 2023 May; 188(Suppl 3):48-55. PubMed ID: 37226055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Receiving feedback from peers: medical students' perceptions.
Burgess A; Mellis C
Clin Teach; 2015 Jun; 12(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 26009957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does formative assessment help students to acquire prescribing skills?
Kalfsvel LS; Peeters LEJ; Hoek K; Bethlehem C; van der Sijs IH; van der Kuy PHM; van den Broek WW; Versmissen J; van Rosse F
Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2023 Apr; 79(4):533-540. PubMed ID: 36811671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Team Objective Structured Bedside Assessment (TOSBA) as formative assessment in undergraduate Obstetrics and Gynaecology: a cohort study.
Deane RP; Joyce P; Murphy DJ
BMC Med Educ; 2015 Oct; 15():172. PubMed ID: 26453191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Undergraduate medical students: who seeks formative feedback?
Sinclair HK; Cleland JA
Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 41(6):580-2. PubMed ID: 17518838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Faculty Perceptions of Formative Feedback from Medical Students.
Robins L; Smith S; Kost A; Combs H; Kritek PA; Klein EJ
Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(2):168-175. PubMed ID: 31523994
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation of preclinical medical students' preference for summative or formative assessment for physiology learning.
Rae MG; Abdulla MH
Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Sep; 47(3):383-392. PubMed ID: 37141432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experiences of medical students and faculty regarding the use of long case as a formative assessment method at a tertiary care teaching hospital in a low resource setting: a qualitative study.
Kumakech J; Munabi IG; Mubuuke AG; Kiguli S
BMC Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 24(1):621. PubMed ID: 38840242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tensions in post-examination feedback: information for learning versus potential for harm.
Ryan A; McColl GJ; O'Brien R; Chiavaroli N; Judd T; Finch S; Swanson D
Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 51(9):963-973. PubMed ID: 28833428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the evaluation of formative assessment at two medical faculties with different conditions of undergraduate training, assessment and feedback.
Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Karay Y; Arias J; Gehlhar K; Zupanic M
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc41. PubMed ID: 32685669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.
Buckley S; Coleman J; Davison I; Khan KS; Zamora J; Malick S; Morley D; Pollard D; Ashcroft T; Popovic C; Sayers J
Med Teach; 2009 Apr; 31(4):282-98. PubMed ID: 19404891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effectiveness of formative assessment in pathophysiology education from students' perspective: a questionnaire study.
Cong X; Zhang Y; Xu H; Liu LM; Zheng M; Xiang RL; Wang JY; Jia S; Cai JY; Liu C; Wu LL
Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Dec; 44(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 33155832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment model blending formative and summative assessments using the SOLO taxonomy.
Svensäter G; Rohlin M
Eur J Dent Educ; 2023 Feb; 27(1):149-157. PubMed ID: 35132742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uptake of formative feedback: perspective from a transnational education cohort.
Menon S; Clyne RK
Essays Biochem; 2022 Apr; 66(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 35355056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A report on the piloting of a novel computer-based medical case simulation for teaching and formative assessment of diagnostic laboratory testing.
Kreiter CD; Haugen T; Leaven T; Goerdt C; Rosenthal N; McGaghie WC; Dee F
Med Educ Online; 2011 Jan; 16():. PubMed ID: 21249173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feedback practices in undergraduate clinical teaching in Sri Lanka - a qualitative study.
Sanchayan S; Olupeliyawa A; Chandratilake M
BMC Med Educ; 2024 May; 24(1):559. PubMed ID: 38778350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
