These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37277737)

  • 1. Effect of metal artifact removal modes on the accuracy of linear measurement around titanium implants by applying different voltages: an original article.
    Goodarzi Pour D; Emami Meybodi E; Sodagar K; Emami Meybodi ZA; Safari S
    BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jun; 23(1):74. PubMed ID: 37277737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Settings on Implant Artifact Production: Zirconia and Titanium.
    Vasconcelos TV; Leandro Nascimento EH; Bechara BB; Freitas DQ; Noujeim M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(5):1114-1120. PubMed ID: 31528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Value and Clinical Application of Orthopedic Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in CT Scans after Orthopedic Metal Implantation.
    Hu Y; Pan S; Zhao X; Guo W; He M; Guo Q
    Korean J Radiol; 2017; 18(3):526-535. PubMed ID: 28458605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of an auto-edge counting method for quantification of metal artifacts in CBCT images: a multivariate analysis of object position, field of view size, tube voltage, and metal artifact reduction algorithm.
    Khosravifard A; Saberi BV; Khosravifard N; Motallebi S; Kajan ZD; Ghaffari ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2021 Dec; 132(6):735-743. PubMed ID: 33975812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different CT metal artifact reduction strategies for standard titanium and carbon-fiber reinforced polymer implants in sheep cadavers.
    Huber FA; Sprengel K; Müller L; Graf LC; Osterhoff G; Guggenberger R
    BMC Med Imaging; 2021 Feb; 21(1):29. PubMed ID: 33588781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantifying near metal visibility using dual energy computed tomography and iterative metal artifact reduction in a fracture phantom.
    Hakvoort ET; Wellenberg RHH; Streekstra GJ
    Phys Med; 2020 Jan; 69():9-18. PubMed ID: 31812728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Metal Artifact Reduction in Pelvic Computed Tomography With Hip Prostheses: Comparison of Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolations From Dual-Energy Computed Tomography and an Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in a Phantom Study.
    Higashigaito K; Angst F; Runge VM; Alkadhi H; Donati OF
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Dec; 50(12):828-34. PubMed ID: 26171565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement Accuracy in Cone Beam Computed Tomography in the Presence of Metal Artifact.
    Ismail A; Lakschevitz F; MacDonald D; Ford NL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(1):143-152. PubMed ID: 35235633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Approaches to reducing photon dose calculation errors near metal implants.
    Huang JY; Followill DS; Howell RM; Liu X; Mirkovic D; Stingo FC; Kry SF
    Med Phys; 2016 Sep; 43(9):5117. PubMed ID: 27587042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development and validation of segmentation and interpolation techniques in sinograms for metal artifact suppression in CT.
    Veldkamp WJ; Joemai RM; van der Molen AJ; Geleijns J
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):620-8. PubMed ID: 20229871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The application of metal artifact reduction (MAR) in CT scans for radiation oncology by monoenergetic extrapolation with a DECT scanner.
    Schwahofer A; Bär E; Kuchenbecker S; Grossmann JG; Kachelrieß M; Sterzing F
    Z Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 25(4):314-325. PubMed ID: 26144602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Preliminary study on the elimination of artifacts of five kinds of dental prosthetic materials by energy spectrum CT multi-material artifact reduction technology].
    Sun Q; Niu ZX; Zheng HY; Su L; Zhao JF; Sun ML
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 54(11):760-764. PubMed ID: 31683383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Exposure Parameters on Metal Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Panjnoush M; Kheirandish Y; Kashani PM; Fakhar HB; Younesi F; Mallahi M
    J Dent (Tehran); 2016 Jun; 13(3):143-150. PubMed ID: 28392810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Frequency split metal artifact reduction (FSMAR) in computed tomography.
    Meyer E; Raupach R; Lell M; Schmidt B; Kachelrieß M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1904-16. PubMed ID: 22482612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Metal artifact reduction in CT, a phantom study: subjective and objective evaluation of four commercial metal artifact reduction algorithms when used on three different orthopedic metal implants.
    Bolstad K; Flatabø S; Aadnevik D; Dalehaug I; Vetti N
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1110-1118. PubMed ID: 29310445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16.
    Costa ALF; Fardim KAC; Mantoani JM; Ricardo ALF; Jardini MAN; Orhan K; de Castro Lopes SLP
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1362473. PubMed ID: 35295958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metal Artifact Reduction Computed Tomography of Arthroplasty Implants: Effects of Combined Modeled Iterative Reconstruction and Dual-Energy Virtual Monoenergetic Extrapolation at Higher Photon Energies.
    Khodarahmi I; Haroun RR; Lee M; Fung GSK; Fuld MK; Schon LC; Fishman EK; Fritz J
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Dec; 53(12):728-735. PubMed ID: 30015677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative Evaluation of Artifacts Originated by Four Different Post Materials Using Different CBCT Settings.
    Helvacioglu-Yigit D; Seki U; Kursun-Cakmak S; Demirturk Kocasarac H; Singh M
    Tomography; 2022 Dec; 8(6):2919-2928. PubMed ID: 36548537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants.
    Fontenele RC; Nascimento EHL; Imbelloni-Vasconcelos AC; Martins LAC; Pontual ADA; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2022 Sep; 52(3):267-273. PubMed ID: 36238703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of artifact removal on cone-beam computed tomography images.
    Fakhar HB; Emami R; Moloudi K; Mosavat F
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2018; 15(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 29576771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.