These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37279733)

  • 1. JUMP: replicability analysis of high-throughput experiments with applications to spatial transcriptomic studies.
    Lyu P; Li Y; Wen X; Cao H
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 39(6):. PubMed ID: 37279733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High throughput screening of co-expressed gene pairs with controlled false discovery rate (FDR) and minimum acceptable strength (MAS).
    Zhu D; Hero AO; Qin ZS; Swaroop A
    J Comput Biol; 2005 Sep; 12(7):1029-45. PubMed ID: 16201920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. SILGGM: An extensive R package for efficient statistical inference in large-scale gene networks.
    Zhang R; Ren Z; Chen W
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Aug; 14(8):e1006369. PubMed ID: 30102702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical analysis of spatial expression patterns for spatially resolved transcriptomic studies.
    Sun S; Zhu J; Zhou X
    Nat Methods; 2020 Feb; 17(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 31988518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Replicability analysis in genome-wide association studies via Cartesian hidden Markov models.
    Wang P; Zhu W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 20(1):146. PubMed ID: 30885122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Kerfdr: a semi-parametric kernel-based approach to local false discovery rate estimation.
    Guedj M; Robin S; Celisse A; Nuel G
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Mar; 10():84. PubMed ID: 19291295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A unified approach to false discovery rate estimation.
    Strimmer K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Jul; 9():303. PubMed ID: 18613966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A multiple-testing procedure for high-dimensional mediation hypotheses.
    Dai JY; Stanford JL; LeBlanc M
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2022; 117(537):198-213. PubMed ID: 35400115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation while controlling false discovery rate for differential expression analysis with RNA-sequencing experiments.
    Bi R; Liu P
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():146. PubMed ID: 27029470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical analysis of spatially resolved transcriptomic data by incorporating multiomics auxiliary information.
    Li Y; Zhou X; Cao H
    Genetics; 2022 Jul; 221(4):. PubMed ID: 35731210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Information-incorporated gene network construction with FDR control.
    Wang H; Qiu Y; Guo H; Yin Y; Liu P
    Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 38430463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of rule-based and centroid single-sample multiclass predictors for transcriptomic classification.
    Eriksson P; Marzouka NA; Sjödahl G; Bernardo C; Liedberg F; Höglund M
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 38(4):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 34788787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates.
    Li J; Paramita P; Choi KP; Karuturi RK
    Biol Direct; 2011 May; 6():27. PubMed ID: 21595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. NBBt-test: a versatile method for differential analysis of multiple types of RNA-seq data.
    Tan YD; Guda C
    Sci Rep; 2022 Jul; 12(1):12833. PubMed ID: 35896555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bon-EV: an improved multiple testing procedure for controlling false discovery rates.
    Li D; Xie Z; Zand M; Fogg T; Dye T
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):1. PubMed ID: 28049414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. False discovery rate-controlled multiple testing for union null hypotheses: a knockoff-based approach.
    Dai R; Zheng C
    Biometrics; 2023 Dec; 79(4):3497-3509. PubMed ID: 36854821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new estimation of protein-level false discovery rate.
    Wu G; Wan X; Xu B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Aug; 19(Suppl 6):567. PubMed ID: 30367581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.