195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37280410)
1. Performance of dedicated breast PET in breast cancer screening: comparison with digital mammography plus digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound.
Yuge S; Miyake KK; Ishimori T; Kataoka M; Matsumoto Y; Torii M; Yakami M; Isoda H; Takakura K; Morita S; Takada M; Toi M; Nakamoto Y
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Sep; 37(9):479-493. PubMed ID: 37280410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ductal carcinoma in situ on digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis: rates and predictors of pathologic upgrade.
Kim G; Mikhael PG; Oseni TO; Bahl M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6089-6098. PubMed ID: 32591884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening: The Reggio Emilia Tomosynthesis Randomized Trial.
Pattacini P; Nitrosi A; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Campari C;
Radiology; 2018 Aug; 288(2):375-385. PubMed ID: 29869961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round.
Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast Density and Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A TOSYMA Trial Subanalysis.
Weigel S; Heindel W; Hense HW; Decker T; Gerß J; Kerschke L;
Radiology; 2023 Feb; 306(2):e221006. PubMed ID: 36194110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Association of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography With Cancer Detection and Recall Rates by Age and Breast Density.
Conant EF; Barlow WE; Herschorn SD; Weaver DL; Beaber EF; Tosteson ANA; Haas JS; Lowry KP; Stout NK; Trentham-Dietz A; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Li CI; Schnall MD; Onega T; Sprague BL;
JAMA Oncol; 2019 May; 5(5):635-642. PubMed ID: 30816931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) plus synthesised two-dimensional mammography (s2D) in breast cancer screening is associated with higher cancer detection and lower recalls compared to digital mammography (DM) alone: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Jänsch A; Hacker A; Weinand S; Vogelmann T
Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2301-2312. PubMed ID: 34694451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Multicenter Evaluation of Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Combination with Synthetic versus Digital Mammography.
Zuckerman SP; Sprague BL; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Conant EF
Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):545-553. PubMed ID: 33048032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening.
McDonald ES; Oustimov A; Weinstein SP; Synnestvedt MB; Schnall M; Conant EF
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):737-43. PubMed ID: 26893205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis in Breast Cancer Screening: The Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Skaane P; Bandos AI; Niklason LT; Sebuødegård S; Østerås BH; Gullien R; Gur D; Hofvind S
Radiology; 2019 Apr; 291(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 30777808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening outcome for consecutive examinations with digital breast tomosynthesis versus standard digital mammography in a population-based screening program.
Hovda T; Brandal SHB; Sebuødegård S; Holen ÅS; Bjørndal H; Skaane P; Hofvind S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6991-6999. PubMed ID: 31187221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis vs Digital Mammography in Community Practice by Patient Age, Screening Round, and Breast Density.
Lowry KP; Coley RY; Miglioretti DL; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Herschorn S; Tosteson ANA; Rauscher G; Lee CI
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Jul; 3(7):e2011792. PubMed ID: 32721031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing accuracy of tomosynthesis plus digital mammography or synthetic 2D mammography in breast cancer screening: baseline results of the MAITA RCT consortium.
Giorgi Rossi P; Mancuso P; Pattacini P; Campari C; Nitrosi A; Iotti V; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Correale L; Riggi E; Giordano L; Segnan N; Di Leo G; Magni V; Sardanelli F; Fornasa F; Romanucci G; Montemezzi S; Falini P; Auzzi N; Zappa M; Ottone M; Mantellini P; Duffy SW; Armaroli P; ; ; Coriani C; Pescarolo M; Stefanelli G; Tondelli G; Beretti F; Caffarri S; Marchesi V; Canovi L; Colli M; Boschini M; Bertolini M; Ragazzi M; Pattacini P; Giorgi Rossi P; Iotti V; Ginocchi V; Ravaioli S; Vacondio R; Campari C; Caroli S; Nitrosi A; Braglia L; Cavuto S; Mancuso P; Djuric O; Venturelli F; Vicentini M; Braghiroli MB; Lonetti J; Davoli E; Bonelli E; Fornasa F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Lucchi I; Martello G; Rossati C; Mantellini P; Ambrogetti D; Iossa A; Carnesciali E; Mazzalupo V; Falini P; Puliti D; Zappa M; Battisti F; Auzzi N; Verdi S; Degl'Innocenti C; Tramalloni D; Cavazza E; Busoni S; Betti E; Peruzzi F; Regini F; Sardanelli F; Di Leo G; Carbonaro LA; Magni V; Cozzi A; Spinelli D; Monaco CG; Schiaffino S; Benedek A; Menicagli L; Ferraris R; Favettini E; Dettori D; Falco P; Presti P; Segnan N; Ponti A; Frigerio A; Armaroli P; Correale L; Marra V; Milanesio L; Artuso F; Di Leo A; Castellano I; Riggi E; Casella D; Pitarella S; Vergini V; Giordano L; Duffy SW; Graewingholt A; Lang K; Falcini F
Eur J Cancer; 2024 Mar; 199():113553. PubMed ID: 38262307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial.
Johnson K; Zackrisson S; Rosso A; Sartor H; Saal LH; Andersson I; Lång K
Radiology; 2019 Nov; 293(2):273-281. PubMed ID: 31478799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening.
Comstock CE; Gatsonis C; Newstead GM; Snyder BS; Gareen IF; Bergin JT; Rahbar H; Sung JS; Jacobs C; Harvey JA; Nicholson MH; Ward RC; Holt J; Prather A; Miller KD; Schnall MD; Kuhl CK
JAMA; 2020 Feb; 323(8):746-756. PubMed ID: 32096852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of implementing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) instead of mammography on population screening outcomes including interval cancer rates: Results of the Trento DBT pilot evaluation.
Bernardi D; Gentilini MA; De Nisi M; Pellegrini M; Fantò C; Valentini M; Sabatino V; Luparia A; Houssami N
Breast; 2020 Apr; 50():135-140. PubMed ID: 31607526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Ultrasound Versus Digital Mammography Plus Ultrasound for Screening Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts.
Ha SM; Yi A; Yim D; Jang MJ; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Lee EJ; Lee SH; Moon WK; Chang JM
Korean J Radiol; 2023 Apr; 24(4):274-283. PubMed ID: 36996902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addition of Screening Breast US to Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Average Risk.
Yi A; Jang MJ; Yim D; Kwon BR; Shin SU; Chang JM
Radiology; 2021 Mar; 298(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 33434108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
