146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37282998)
1. A Clinical Evaluation of Difference in Shades among Maxillary Central Incisor, Canine, and First Molar in a Young Age-group Using Digital Spectrophotometer: An
Kaur M; Patil R; Dhaded S; Hegde P; Dhaded N; Shah RR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(9):907-912. PubMed ID: 37282998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: A clinical study.
Liberato WF; Barreto IC; Costa PP; de Almeida CC; Pimentel W; Tiossi R
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Feb; 121(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 30722987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of Shade Matching in Natural Dentitions Using Intraoral Digital Spectrophotometer in LED and Filtered LED Light Sources.
Chitrarsu VK; Chidambaranathan AS; Balasubramaniam M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e68-e73. PubMed ID: 29086458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching.
Igiel C; Lehmann KM; Ghinea R; Weyhrauch M; Hangx Y; Scheller H; Paravina RD
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2017 Sep; 29(5):303-308. PubMed ID: 28742283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system.
Öngül D; Şermet B; Balkaya MC
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jul; 108(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 22765984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between conventional visual and spectrophotometric methods for shade selection.
Judeh A; Al-Wahadni A
Quintessence Int; 2009 Oct; 40(9):e69-79. PubMed ID: 19862392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional representation of the Vita Toothguide 3D-Master: An in vivo clinical study.
Gómez-Polo C; Fraile JF; López NQ; Muñoz MP; Lobato M; Montero J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Mar; 36(3):421-428. PubMed ID: 38053482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience.
Yılmaz B; Irmak Ö; Yaman BC
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Sep; 31(5):500-507. PubMed ID: 31228358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of different light sources on tooth shade selection.
Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
Dent Med Probl; 2020; 57(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 32068979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of two optical devices used for artificial tooth color selection.
Śmielecka M; Dorocka-Bobkowska B
Dent Med Probl; 2022; 59(2):249-253. PubMed ID: 35584297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between direct and indirect "digital image" dental visual shade matching considering the effect of clinical experience and gender.
Makhloota M; Köroğlu A; Turhan Bal B; Velioğlu N
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Jun; 36(6):827-837. PubMed ID: 38197140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences between the human eye and the spectrophotometer in the shade matching of tooth colour.
Gómez-Polo C; Gómez-Polo M; Celemin-Viñuela A; Martínez Vázquez De Parga JA
J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):742-5. PubMed ID: 24140995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Performance of Newly Developed Android Mobile Digital Application on Tooth Shade Reproduction: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
Chaware SH; Borse SV; Kakatkar V; Darekar A
Contemp Clin Dent; 2023; 14(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 37250002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of self shade matching ability of dental students using visual and instrumental means.
Alsaleh S; Labban M; AlHariri M; Tashkandi E
J Dent; 2012 Jul; 40 Suppl 1():e82-7. PubMed ID: 22306532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of a smartphone-based software application as a potential digital tool in tooth shade selection: a prospective clinical study.
Raza FB; Kumar VA; Jacob A; Ali A
Quintessence Int; 2021 Jun; 52(7):608-617. PubMed ID: 33688711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
Ayash G; Rayyan MM; Segaan L; Sayed M
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Aug; 24(8):545-550. PubMed ID: 38193175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Comparative Study of Shade-Matching Reproducibility Using an Intraoral Scanner and a Spectrophotometer.
Floriani F; Jurado CA; Abuhammoud S; Vargas M; Fischer NG; Rojas-Rueda S; Lopes GC
Dent J (Basel); 2024 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 38534286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment.
Czigola A; Róth I; Vitai V; Fehér D; Hermann P; Borbély J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Dec; 33(8):1166-1174. PubMed ID: 34397163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Shade selection of primary maxillary anterior teeth in children using Vitapan classical shade guide.
Chenchugopal M; Venumbaka NR; Vijayakumar P; Selvaraju G; Rajendran S; Elangovan A
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(6):657-660. PubMed ID: 28169266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the ambient light illuminance conditions on the shade matching capabilities of an intraoral scanner.
Revilla-León M; Methani MM; Özcan M
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Sep; 33(6):906-912. PubMed ID: 32959520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
