219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3728456)
1. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, biopsy imprints, and biopsy sections.
Pasquale D; Chikkappa G
Am J Hematol; 1986 Aug; 22(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 3728456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Application of bone marrow biopsy imprint in evaluating cellularity].
Lu XG; Huang LS; Xu XH; Yang JJ; Zhu L; Zhao XY; Xu GB
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2006 May; 35(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 16764040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of bone marrow aspirate particle smears, imprints and biopsy sections.
Sabharwal BD; Malhotra V; Aruna S; Grewal R
J Postgrad Med; 1990 Oct; 36(4):194-8. PubMed ID: 2132243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone marrow biopsy imprints (touch preparations) for assessment of iron stores.
Pasquale D; Chikkappa G
Am J Hematol; 1995 Mar; 48(3):201-2. PubMed ID: 7532354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative efficacy of bone marrow trephine biopsy sections as compared to trephine imprints and aspiration smears in routine hematological practice.
Varma N; Dash S; Sarode R; Marwaha N
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1993 Jul; 36(3):215-26. PubMed ID: 8300166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of bone marrow imprints in haematological diagnosis: a detailed study of 3781 cases.
Gong X; Lu X; Wu X; Xu R; Tang Q; Xu G; Wang L; Zhang X; Zhao X
Cytopathology; 2012 Apr; 23(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 21129051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of the bone marrow by the volumetric method, particle smears, and biopsies in pediatric disorders.
Ozkaynak MF; Scribano P; Gomperts E; Izadi P; Millin R; Isaacs H; Ettinger LJ
Am J Hematol; 1988 Nov; 29(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 3189309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are routine iron stains on bone marrow trephine biopsy specimens necessary?
Stuart-Smith SE; Hughes DA; Bain BJ
J Clin Pathol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15735158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Refractile mycobacteria in Romanowsky-stained bone marrow smears. A comparison of acid-fast-stained tissue sections and Romanowsky-stained smears.
Torlakovic E; Clayton F; Ames ED
Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Mar; 97(3):318-21. PubMed ID: 1371899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of bone marrow plasma cell infiltration in multiple myeloma: usefulness of bone marrow aspirate clot with CD138 immunohistochemistry.
Matsue K; Matsue Y; Kumata K; Usui Y; Suehara Y; Fukumoto K; Fujisawa M; Narita K; Takeuchi M
Hematol Oncol; 2017 Sep; 35(3):323-328. PubMed ID: 27140172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [A histopathological study of bone marrow in acute myeloid leukemia. Bone marrow biopsy changes before chemotherapy and comparison with bone marrow smears].
Pu Q; Tang CS; Zhou RH
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Sep; 30(9):566-8, 595. PubMed ID: 1806340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Mi15 monoclonal antibody (anti-syndecan-1) is a reliable marker for quantifying plasma cells in paraffin-embedded bone marrow biopsy specimens.
Costes V; Magen V; Legouffe E; Durand L; Baldet P; Rossi JF; Klein B; Brochier J
Hum Pathol; 1999 Dec; 30(12):1405-11. PubMed ID: 10667416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnosis of unknown nonhematological tumors by bone marrow biopsy: a retrospective analysis of 10,112 samples.
Xiao L; Luxi S; Ying T; Yizhi L; Lingyun W; Quan P
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 May; 135(5):687-93. PubMed ID: 18956213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative utility of diagnostic bone-marrow components: a 10-year study.
Barekman CL; Fair KP; Cotelingam JD
Am J Hematol; 1997 Sep; 56(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 9298866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of touch imprints with aspirate smears for evaluating bone marrow specimens.
Aboul-Nasr R; Estey EH; Kantarjian HM; Freireich EJ; Andreeff M; Johnson BJ; Albitar M
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jun; 111(6):753-8. PubMed ID: 10361510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone Marrow Collection: Comparison of Unassisted vs Assisted Bedside Collections by a Laboratory Technologist.
Ali SF; Cloe A; Siaghani PJ; Himchak E; Cantu D; Gaal K; Kim YS; Afkhami M; Pillai R; Chan W; Quirk E; Weisenburger DD; Aoun P; Song JY
Am J Clin Pathol; 2022 Apr; 157(4):573-577. PubMed ID: 34788366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bone marrow aspirate cytology, touch imprint cytology and trephine biopsy for bone marrow evaluation.
Chandra S; Chandra H
Hematol Rep; 2011 Oct; 3(3):e22. PubMed ID: 22593814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Utility of thick smears of bone marrow aspirate in pyrexia of unknown origin.
Sheikh NS; Sheikh AS; Hussain SI; Sheikh AA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Oct; 13(10):577-80. PubMed ID: 14588172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fluorescent in situ hybridization in routinely processed bone marrow aspirate clot and core biopsy sections.
Miranda RN; Mark HF; Medeiros LJ
Am J Pathol; 1994 Dec; 145(6):1309-14. PubMed ID: 7992836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of peripheral blood, bone marrow aspirate and especially bone marrow trephine biopsy in distinguishing atypical chronic myeloid leukemia from chronic granulocytic leukemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.
Xubo G; Xingguo L; Xianguo W; Rongzhen X; Xibin X; Lin W; Lei Z; Xiaohong Z; Genbo X; Xiaoying Z
Eur J Haematol; 2009 Oct; 83(4):292-301. PubMed ID: 19500135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
