These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37285103)

  • 21. Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion.
    Lim YK; Chu EH; Lee DY; Yang IH; Baek SH
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):896-903. PubMed ID: 20578861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A study of Class III treatment: orthodontic camouflage vs orthognathic surgery.
    Georgalis K; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 Nov; 31(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 26999886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.
    Patil HS; Golwalkar S; Chougule K; Kulkarni NR
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2021 Feb; 63(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 33650399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Changes in natural head position after orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III patients.
    Cho D; Choi DS; Jang I; Cha BK
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 26038079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of an imaging software and manual prediction of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery.
    Ahmad Akhoundi MS; Shirani G; Arshad M; Heidar H; Sodagar A
    J Dent (Tehran); 2012; 9(3):178-87. PubMed ID: 23119126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Lower lip deformity in patients with cleft and non-cleft Class III malocclusion before and after orthognathic surgery.
    Park JS; Koh KS; Choi JW
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1638-42. PubMed ID: 26315274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-term stability and prediction of soft tissue changes after LeFort I surgery.
    Hack GA; de Mol van Otterloo JJ; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Dec; 104(6):544-55. PubMed ID: 8249930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.
    Bergman RT; Waschak J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Murphy NC
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 23834271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Surgical prediction of skeletal and soft tissue changes in Class III treatment.
    de Lira Ade L; de Moura WL; de Barros Vieira JM; Nojima MG; Nojima LI
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):e290-7. PubMed ID: 22449434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Soft tissue images from cephalograms compared with those from a 3D surface acquisition system.
    Incrapera AK; Kau CH; English JD; McGrory K; Sarver DM
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 19852641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Preliminary evaluation on 3-demension changes of facial soft tissue with structure light scanning technique before and after orthognathic surgery of Class III deformities].
    Peng JX; Jiang JH; Zhao YJ; Wang Y; Li Z; Wang NN; Feng ZM
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2015 Feb; 47(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 25686337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with maxillary expansion and protraction headgear treatment.
    Ngan P; Hägg U; Yiu C; Merwin D; Wei SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1996 Jan; 109(1):38-49. PubMed ID: 8540481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Changes in the facial soft-tissue profile after mandibular orthognathic surgery.
    Rupperti S; Winterhalder P; Rudzki I; Mast G; Holberg C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Apr; 23(4):1771-1776. PubMed ID: 30173318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Soft tissue response in orthognathic surgery patients treated by bimaxillary osteotomy: cephalometry compared with 2-D photogrammetry.
    Rustemeyer J; Martin A
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 17(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22562282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Relationship between malocclusion, soft tissue profile, and pharyngeal airways: A cephalometric study.
    Lopatienė K; Šidlauskas A; Vasiliauskas A; Čečytė L; Švalkauskienė V; Šidlauskas M
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2016; 52(5):307-314. PubMed ID: 27816426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Changes in soft tissue profile after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Kajikawa Y
    J Oral Surg; 1979 Mar; 37(3):167-74. PubMed ID: 283217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible.
    Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):542-6; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 10319828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The validity of using profile predictions for class III patients planned for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Franks SL; Bakshi A; Khambay BS
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 May; 60(4):507-512. PubMed ID: 35346522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.