141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37285780)
1. A review of the efforts to develop muscle and musculoskeletal models for biomechanics in the last 50 years.
Wakeling JM; Febrer-Nafría M; De Groote F
J Biomech; 2023 Jun; 155():111657. PubMed ID: 37285780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of Hill-type muscle models in relation to neuromuscular recruitment and force-velocity properties: predicting patterns of in vivo muscle force.
Biewener AA; Wakeling JM; Lee SS; Arnold AS
Integr Comp Biol; 2014 Dec; 54(6):1072-83. PubMed ID: 24928073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved Hill-type musculotendon models with activation-force-length coupling.
Sun L; Sun Y; Huang Z; Hou J; Wu J
Technol Health Care; 2018; 26(6):909-920. PubMed ID: 29914041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the validity of Hill and Huxley muscle-tendon complex models using experimental data obtained from rat m. soleus in situ.
Lemaire KK; Baan GC; Jaspers RT; van Soest AJ
J Exp Biol; 2016 Apr; 219(Pt 7):977-87. PubMed ID: 26896546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Muscle-tendon unit scaling methods of Hill-type musculoskeletal models: An overview.
Heinen F; Lund ME; Rasmussen J; de Zee M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2016 Oct; 230(10):976-84. PubMed ID: 27459500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Numerical instability of Hill-type muscle models.
Yeo SH; Verheul J; Herzog W; Sueda S
J R Soc Interface; 2023 Feb; 20(199):20220430. PubMed ID: 36722069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modelling approach for exploring muscle dynamics during cyclic contractions.
Ross SA; Nigam N; Wakeling JM
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 14(4):e1006123. PubMed ID: 29659583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Static versus dynamic muscle modelling in extinct species: a biomechanical case study of the
Wiseman ALA; Charles JP; Hutchinson JR
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16821. PubMed ID: 38313026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Musculotendon Parameters in Lower Limb Models: Simplifications, Uncertainties, and Muscle Force Estimation Sensitivity.
Chen Z; Franklin DW
Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Jun; 51(6):1147-1164. PubMed ID: 36913088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A two-muscle, continuum-mechanical forward simulation of the upper limb.
Röhrle O; Sprenger M; Schmitt S
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Jun; 16(3):743-762. PubMed ID: 27837360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Construction and Simulation of Biomechanical Model of Human Hip Joint Muscle-Tendon Assisted by Elastic External Tendon by Hill Muscle Model.
Luo X; Cai G; Ma K; Cai A
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():1987345. PubMed ID: 35958782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Huxley-type cross-bridge models in largeish-scale musculoskeletal models; an evaluation of computational cost.
van Soest AJK; Casius LJR; Lemaire KK
J Biomech; 2019 Jan; 83():43-48. PubMed ID: 30554816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Classifying muscle parameters with artificial neural networks and simulated lateral pinch data.
Kearney KM; Harley JB; Nichols JA
PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0255103. PubMed ID: 34473706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional data-tracking dynamic optimization simulations of human locomotion generated by direct collocation.
Lin YC; Pandy MG
J Biomech; 2017 Jul; 59():1-8. PubMed ID: 28583674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Force from cat soleus muscle during imposed locomotor-like movements: experimental data versus Hill-type model predictions.
Sandercock TG; Heckman CJ
J Neurophysiol; 1997 Mar; 77(3):1538-52. PubMed ID: 9084618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nonlinearities make a difference: comparison of two common Hill-type models with real muscle.
Siebert T; Rode C; Herzog W; Till O; Blickhan R
Biol Cybern; 2008 Feb; 98(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 18049823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of biophysical muscle properties on simulating fast human arm movements.
Bayer A; Schmitt S; Günther M; Haeufle DFB
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Jun; 20(8):803-821. PubMed ID: 28387534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct Methods for Predicting Movement Biomechanics Based Upon Optimal Control Theory with Implementation in OpenSim.
Porsa S; Lin YC; Pandy MG
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Aug; 44(8):2542-2557. PubMed ID: 26715209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gauging force by tapping tendons.
Martin JA; Brandon SCE; Keuler EM; Hermus JR; Ehlers AC; Segalman DJ; Allen MS; Thelen DG
Nat Commun; 2018 Apr; 9(1):1592. PubMed ID: 29686281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical behavior of muscle-tendon complex during dynamic human movements.
Fukashiro S; Hay DC; Nagano A
J Appl Biomech; 2006 May; 22(2):131-47. PubMed ID: 16871004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
