234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37286100)
1. Prediction of birthweight and risk of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes.
Shulman Y; Shah BR; Berger H; Yoon EW; Helpaerin I; Mei-Dan E; Aviram A; Retnakaran R; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Aug; 5(8):101042. PubMed ID: 37286100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study.
Kadji C; Cannie MM; Kang X; Carlin A; Benjou Etchoua S; Resta S; Dütemeyer V; Abi-Khalil F; Mazzone E; Bevilacqua E; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reducing macrosomia-related birth complications in primigravid women: ultrasound- and magnetic resonance imaging-based models.
Badr DA; Cannie MM; Kadji C; Kang X; Carlin A; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 May; 230(5):557.e1-557.e8. PubMed ID: 37827273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sonographic and other nonglycemic factors can predict large-for-gestational-age infants in diet-managed gestational diabetes mellitus: A retrospective cohort study.
Chee C; Hibbert EJ; Lam P; Nanan R; Liu A
J Diabetes; 2020 Aug; 12(8):562-572. PubMed ID: 32250016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Antenatal prediction of fetal macrosomia in pregnancies affected by maternal pre-gestational diabetes.
O'Dwyer V; Russell NM; McDonnell B; Sharkey L; Mulcahy C; Higgins MF
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):7412-7416. PubMed ID: 34229553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
Khan N; Ciobanu A; Karampitsakos T; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting primary cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus.
Ramos SZ; Lewkowitz AK; Lord MG; Has P; Danilack VA; Savitz DA; Werner EF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Nov; 229(5):549.e1-549.e16. PubMed ID: 37290567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The added value of umbilical vein flow in predicting fetal macrosomia at 36 weeks of gestation: A prospective cohort study.
Rizzo G; Mappa I; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Makatsarya A; D'Antonio F
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 May; 100(5):900-907. PubMed ID: 33216942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal biacromial diameter as a new ultrasound measure for prediction of macrosomia in term pregnancy: a prospective observational study.
Youssef AEA; Amin AF; Khalaf M; Khalaf MS; Ali MK; Abbas AM
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(16):2674-2679. PubMed ID: 29478363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Association between fetal abdominal circumference and birthweight in maternal hyperglycemia.
Lee BH; Park TC; Lee HJ
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Aug; 93(8):786-93. PubMed ID: 24815934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prediction of macrosomia by serial sonographic measurements of fetal soft-tissues and the liver in women with pregestational diabetes.
Garabedian C; Vambergue A; Salleron J; Deruelle P
Diabetes Metab; 2013 Dec; 39(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23643348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Universal third-trimester ultrasonic screening using fetal macrosomia in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
Moraitis AA; Shreeve N; Sovio U; Brocklehurst P; Heazell AEP; Thornton JG; Robson SC; Papageorghiou A; Smith GC
PLoS Med; 2020 Oct; 17(10):e1003190. PubMed ID: 33048935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Competing risks model for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates from biophysical markers at 19 to 24 weeks' gestation.
Papastefanou I; Nowacka U; Syngelaki A; Mansukhani T; Karamanis G; Wright D; Nicolaides KH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):530.e1-530.e19. PubMed ID: 33901487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and validation of a machine-learning model for prediction of shoulder dystocia.
Tsur A; Batsry L; Toussia-Cohen S; Rosenstein MG; Barak O; Brezinov Y; Yoeli-Ullman R; Sivan E; Sirota M; Druzin ML; Stevenson DK; Blumenfeld YJ; Aran D
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 56(4):588-596. PubMed ID: 31587401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gestational diabetes and fetal growth in twin compared with singleton pregnancies.
Ashwal E; Berger H; Hiersch L; Yoon EW; Zaltz A; Shah B; Halperin I; Barrett J; Melamed N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):420.e1-420.e13. PubMed ID: 33872592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population.
De Reu PA; Smits LJ; Oosterbaan HP; Nijhuis JG
J Perinat Med; 2008; 36(4):324-9. PubMed ID: 18598122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Large-for-gestational age diagnosed during second-trimester anatomy ultrasound and association with gestational diabetes and large-for-gestational age at birth.
Rekawek P; Liu L; Getrajdman C; Brooks C; Pan S; Overbey J; Wagner B
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Dec; 56(6):901-905. PubMed ID: 31763722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Role of Maternal Weight in the Hierarchy of Macrosomia Predictors; Overall Effect of Analysis of Three Prediction Indicators.
Lewandowska M
Nutrients; 2021 Feb; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33671089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk of adverse perinatal outcomes in pregnancies with "small" fetuses not meeting Delphi consensus criteria for fetal growth restriction.
Powel JE; Chavan NR; Zantow EW; Bialko MF; Farley LG; McCormick KM; Tomlinson TM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Oct; 229(4):447.e1-447.e13. PubMed ID: 37767605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
