BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37286151)

  • 1. PPA: Principal parcellation analysis for brain connectomes and multiple traits.
    Liu R; Li M; Dunson DB
    Neuroimage; 2023 Aug; 276():120214. PubMed ID: 37286151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tree representations of brain structural connectivity via persistent homology.
    Li D; Nguyen P; Zhang Z; Dunson D
    Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1200373. PubMed ID: 37901431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tensor network factorizations: Relationships between brain structural connectomes and traits.
    Zhang Z; Allen GI; Zhu H; Dunson D
    Neuroimage; 2019 Aug; 197():330-343. PubMed ID: 31029870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Connectomes from streamlines tractography: Assigning streamlines to brain parcellations is not trivial but highly consequential.
    Yeh CH; Smith RE; Dhollander T; Calamante F; Connelly A
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 199():160-171. PubMed ID: 31082471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mapping population-based structural connectomes.
    Zhang Z; Descoteaux M; Zhang J; Girard G; Chamberland M; Dunson D; Srivastava A; Zhu H
    Neuroimage; 2018 May; 172():130-145. PubMed ID: 29355769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimizing Connectivity-Driven Brain Parcellation Using Ensemble Clustering.
    Kurmukov A; Mussabaeva A; Denisova Y; Moyer D; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Gutman BA
    Brain Connect; 2020 May; 10(4):183-194. PubMed ID: 32264696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An extensive assessment of network alignment algorithms for comparison of brain connectomes.
    Milano M; Guzzi PH; Tymofieva O; Xu D; Hess C; Veltri P; Cannataro M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jun; 18(Suppl 6):235. PubMed ID: 28617222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling white matter in gyral blades as a continuous vector field.
    Cottaar M; Bastiani M; Boddu N; Glasser MF; Haber S; van Essen DC; Sotiropoulos SN; Jbabdi S
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 227():117693. PubMed ID: 33385545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Toward a standardized structural-functional group connectome in MNI space.
    Horn A; Blankenburg F
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):310-322. PubMed ID: 26327244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Connectome spatial smoothing (CSS): Concepts, methods, and evaluation.
    Mansour L S; Seguin C; Smith RE; Zalesky A
    Neuroimage; 2022 Apr; 250():118930. PubMed ID: 35077853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using connectomics for predictive assessment of brain parcellations.
    Albers KJ; Ambrosen KS; Liptrot MG; Dyrby TB; Schmidt MN; Mørup M
    Neuroimage; 2021 Sep; 238():118170. PubMed ID: 34087365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A human brain atlas derived via n-cut parcellation of resting-state and task-based fMRI data.
    James GA; Hazaroglu O; Bush KA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Feb; 34(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 26523655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Connectomes: Methods of White Matter Tractography and Contributions of Resting State fMRI.
    Moody JF; Adluru N; Alexander AL; Field AS
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2021 Oct; 42(5):507-522. PubMed ID: 34537118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Graph auto-encoding brain networks with applications to analyzing large-scale brain imaging datasets.
    Liu M; Zhang Z; Dunson DB
    Neuroimage; 2021 Dec; 245():118750. PubMed ID: 34823023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Connectomes for 40,000 UK Biobank participants: A multi-modal, multi-scale brain network resource.
    Mansour L S; Di Biase MA; Smith RE; Zalesky A; Seguin C
    Neuroimage; 2023 Dec; 283():120407. PubMed ID: 37839728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Non-negative data-driven mapping of structural connections with application to the neonatal brain.
    Thompson E; Mohammadi-Nejad AR; Robinson EC; Andersson JLR; Jbabdi S; Glasser MF; Bastiani M; Sotiropoulos SN
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 222():117273. PubMed ID: 32818619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fiber clustering versus the parcellation-based connectome.
    O'Donnell LJ; Golby AJ; Westin CF
    Neuroimage; 2013 Oct; 80():283-9. PubMed ID: 23631987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Superficial white matter bundle atlas based on hierarchical fiber clustering over probabilistic tractography data.
    Román C; Hernández C; Figueroa M; Houenou J; Poupon C; Mangin JF; Guevara P
    Neuroimage; 2022 Nov; 262():119550. PubMed ID: 35944796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is removal of weak connections necessary for graph-theoretical analysis of dense weighted structural connectomes from diffusion MRI?
    Civier O; Smith RE; Yeh CH; Connelly A; Calamante F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():68-81. PubMed ID: 30844506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Building connectomes using diffusion MRI: why, how and but.
    Sotiropoulos SN; Zalesky A
    NMR Biomed; 2019 Apr; 32(4):e3752. PubMed ID: 28654718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.