These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37286503)
1. Biomechanical behavior of all-ceramic endocrowns fabricated using CAD/CAM: A systematic review. AlHelal AA J Prosthodont Res; 2024 Jan; 68(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 37286503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of clinical efficacy of CAD CAM Endocrowns made of feldspathic ceramic, zirconia lithium silicate, and lithium disilicate: A two-year mixed cohort study. Jalali S; Asgari N; Pirooz P; Younespour S; Atri F J Dent; 2024 Oct; 149():105019. PubMed ID: 38670333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of endocrown restorations utilizing different machinable blocks subjected to thermomechanical aging. Taha D; Spintzyk S; Sabet A; Wahsh M; Salah T J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jul; 30(4):319-328. PubMed ID: 30113129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fracture strengths of endocrown restorations fabricated with different preparation depths and CAD/CAM materials. Kanat-Ertürk B; Saridağ S; Köseler E; Helvacioğlu-Yiğit D; Avcu E; Yildiran-Avcu Y Dent Mater J; 2018 Mar; 37(2):256-265. PubMed ID: 29311428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fracture Strength of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing Ceramic Materials: An In-Vitro Study. Alshali S; Attar E Cureus; 2023 Jul; 15(7):e41531. PubMed ID: 37426406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of material thickness on fractural strength of CAD/CAM fabricated ceramic crowns. Zimmermann M; Egli G; Zaruba M; Mehl A Dent Mater J; 2017 Nov; 36(6):778-783. PubMed ID: 28835598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginal gap distance and cyclic fatigue loading for different all-ceramic endocrowns. Elsayed SM; Emam ZN; Abu-Nawareg M; Zidan AZ; Elsisi HA; Abuelroos EM; Fansa HA; Shokier HMR; Elbanna KA Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2023 Feb; 27(3):879-887. PubMed ID: 36808333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study. El Ghoul WA; Özcan M; Ounsi H; Tohme H; Salameh Z J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):128-134. PubMed ID: 31027958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Comparative Analysis of Marginal Adaptation Values between Lithium Disilicate Glass Ceramics and Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Alwadai GS; Al Moaleem MM; Daghrery AA; Albar NH; Daghriri AA; AlGhamdi MM; Ageel SE; Daghreeri FAA; Al-Amri TMA; Aridhi WH; Almnea RA; Alhendi KD Med Sci Monit; 2023 Dec; 29():e942649. PubMed ID: 38148601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fracture Resistance of Monolithic Glass-Ceramics Versus Bilayered Zirconia-Based Restorations. Hamza TA; Sherif RM J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):e259-e264. PubMed ID: 29044828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Adaptations of CAD/CAM Endocrowns and Crowns Fabricated from Three Different Materials. Hasanzade M; Sahebi M; Zarrati S; Payaminia L; Alikhasi M Int J Prosthodont; 2021; 34(3):341–347. PubMed ID: 31856266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture resistance and failure modes of endocrowns manufactured with different CAD/CAM materials under axial and lateral loading. El Ghoul W; Özcan M; Silwadi M; Salameh Z J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Jul; 31(4):378-387. PubMed ID: 31067007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of endocrowns made of lithium disilicate glass-ceramic or polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks and direct composite resin restorations: fatigue performance and stress distribution. Dartora G; Rocha Pereira GK; Varella de Carvalho R; Zucuni CP; Valandro LF; Cesar PF; Caldas RA; Bacchi A J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103401. PubMed ID: 31445400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Comparative Study of the Marginal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study. Attar E; Alshali S; Abuhaimed T Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40081. PubMed ID: 37292110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fracture strength of endocrowns after thermomechanical aging. Dikici B; Can E; Türkeş Başaran E; Barut G; Dönmez N Odontology; 2024 Jul; 112(3):884-894. PubMed ID: 38289451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Marginal adaptation and fracture strength of endocrowns manufactured with different restorative materials: SEM and mechanical evaluation. Sağlam G; Cengiz S; Karacaer Ö Microsc Res Tech; 2021 Feb; 84(2):284-290. PubMed ID: 32915479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical behavior of endocrown restorations with different CAD-CAM materials: A 3D finite element and in vitro analysis. Zheng Z; He Y; Ruan W; Ling Z; Zheng C; Gai Y; Yan W J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):890-899. PubMed ID: 32471627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments. Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of different preparation designs and all ceramic materials on fracture strength of molar endocrowns. Haralur SB; Alamrey AA; Alshehri SA; Alzahrani DS; Alfarsi M J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2020; 18():2280800020947329. PubMed ID: 33151780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]