130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37287100)
1. Comparing the resource implications of old and new colorectal adenoma surveillance guidelines in Australia.
Ow TW; Angelica B; Burn S; Chu M; Lee SZ; Lin R; Tran V; Iyngkaran G; Bampton P; Sukocheva O; Tse E; Rayner CK
Intern Med J; 2024 Feb; 54(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 37287100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Colonoscopy surveillance following adenoma removal to reduce the risk of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Cross AJ; Robbins EC; Pack K; Stenson I; Kirby PL; Patel B; Rutter MD; Veitch AM; Saunders BP; Little M; Gray A; Duffy SW; Wooldrage K
Health Technol Assess; 2022 May; 26(26):1-156. PubMed ID: 35635015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.
Anderson JC; Baron JA; Ahnen DJ; Barry EL; Bostick RM; Burke CA; Bresalier RS; Church TR; Cole BF; Cruz-Correa M; Kim AS; Mott LA; Sandler RS; Robertson DJ
Gastroenterology; 2017 Jun; 152(8):1933-1943.e5. PubMed ID: 28219690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prevalence of Adenomas on Surveillance Colonoscopies for Patients with a History of Colonic Polyps of Unknown Histology.
Doyle JB; Krigel A; Lebwohl B
Dig Dis Sci; 2022 Jul; 67(7):3239-3243. PubMed ID: 34156591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rates of repeated colonoscopies to clean the colon from low-risk and high-risk adenomas: results from the EPoS trials.
Juul FE; Garborg K; Nesbakken E; Løberg M; Wieszczy P; Cubiella J; Kalager M; Kaminski MF; Erichsen R; Adami HO; Ferlitsch M; Furholm SKB; Zauber AG; Quintero E; Bugajski M; Holme Ø; Dekker E; Jover R; Bretthauer M
Gut; 2023 May; 72(5):951-957. PubMed ID: 36307178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advanced age alone should not preclude surveillance colonoscopy in the octogenarian and older population.
Sapci I; Guyton K; Church J; Liska D; Gorgun E; Steele SR; Valente MA
Am J Surg; 2022 Mar; 223(3):510-512. PubMed ID: 34916038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implications of different guidelines for surveillance after serrated polyp resection in United States of America and Europe.
Bleijenberg A; Klotz D; Løberg M; Dekker E; Adami HO; Kuipers EJ; Holme Ø; Kalager M; Emilsson L; Kleist B; Løvdal L; Regula J; Løberg EM; IJspeert J; Bretthauer M
Endoscopy; 2019 Aug; 51(8):750-758. PubMed ID: 31195423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry.
Anderson JC; Butterly LF; Goodrich M; Robinson CM; Weiss JE
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Oct; 11(10):1308-12. PubMed ID: 23660415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colonoscopy: a review of its yield for cancers and adenomas by indication.
Rex DK
Am J Gastroenterol; 1995 Mar; 90(3):353-65. PubMed ID: 7872270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevalence and characteristics of incidental colorectal polyps in patients undergoing colonoscopy at a South African tertiary institution.
Kruger J; Katsidzira L; Setshedi M; Thomson SR
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 33403964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recurrence and surveillance of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in a southern Chinese population.
Huang Y; Gong W; Su B; Zhi F; Liu S; Bai Y; Jiang B
J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 45(8):838-45. PubMed ID: 20336471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimal resource allocation in colonoscopy: timing of follow-up colonoscopies in relation to adenoma detection rates.
Sint Nicolaas J; de Jonge V; van Baalen O; Kubben FJ; Moolenaar W; Stolk MF; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME;
Endoscopy; 2013 Jul; 45(7):545-52. PubMed ID: 23580411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The basis and implications of diverging approaches to colorectal adenoma surveillance in the West.
Ow TW; Tse E; Iyngkaran G; Macrae F
Intern Med J; 2023 Apr; 53(4):635-639. PubMed ID: 37005714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of Colonoscopy Is Associated With Adenoma Detection and Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer Prevention in Lynch Syndrome.
Sánchez A; Roos VH; Navarro M; Pineda M; Caballol B; Moreno L; Carballal S; Rodríguez-Alonso L; Ramon Y Cajal T; Llort G; Piñol V; López-Fernández A; Salces I; Picó MD; Rivas L; Bujanda L; Garzon M; Pizarro A; Martinez de Castro E; López-Arias MJ; Poves C; Garau C; Rodriguez-Alcalde D; Herraiz M; Alvarez-Urrutia C; Dacal A; Carrillo-Palau M; Cid L; Ponce M; Barreiro-Alonso E; Saperas E; Aguirre E; Romero C; Bastiaansen B; Gonzalez-Acosta M; Morales-Romero B; Ocaña T; Rivero-Sánchez L; Jung G; Bessa X; Cubiella J; Jover R; Rodríguez-Moranta F; Balmaña J; Brunet J; Castells A; Dekker E; Capella G; Serra-Burriel M; Moreira L; Pellise M; Balaguer F
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 20(3):611-621.e9. PubMed ID: 33157315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Five-year risk for advanced colorectal neoplasia after initial colonoscopy according to the baseline risk stratification: a prospective study in 2452 asymptomatic Koreans.
Chung SJ; Kim YS; Yang SY; Song JH; Kim D; Park MJ; Kim SG; Song IS; Kim JS
Gut; 2011 Nov; 60(11):1537-43. PubMed ID: 21427200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. What level of bowel prep quality requires early repeat colonoscopy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preparation quality on adenoma detection rate.
Clark BT; Rustagi T; Laine L
Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1714-23; quiz 1724. PubMed ID: 25135006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality of colonoscopy performed by medical or surgical specialists and trainees in five Australian hospitals.
Ow TW; Sukocheva OA; Tran V; Lin R; Lee SZ; Chu M; Angelica B; Rayner CK; Tse E; Iyngkaran G; Bampton PA
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Nov; 14(11):672-683. PubMed ID: 36438878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.
Winawer SJ; Zauber AG; Fletcher RH; Stillman JS; O'brien MJ; Levin B; Smith RA; Lieberman DA; Burt RW; Levin TR; Bond JH; Brooks D; Byers T; Hyman N; Kirk L; Thorson A; Simmang C; Johnson D; Rex DK
CA Cancer J Clin; 2006; 56(3):143-59; quiz 184-5. PubMed ID: 16737947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impacts of Computer-Aided Detection of Colorectal Polyps on Subsequent Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals: Simulation Study.
Lui KLT; Liu SHK; Leung K; Wu JT; Zauber AG; Leung WK
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Feb; 25():e42665. PubMed ID: 36763451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Faecal immunochemical test mitigates risk of delayed colonoscopy in people with elevated risk of colorectal neoplasia.
Wassie MM; Young GP; Cock C; Bampton P; Winter JM; Simpson K; Saluja H; Chuang A; Fraser RJ; Symonds EL
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Jun; 37(6):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 35261071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
