122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37287251)
1. CT values of contrast-enhanced CBBCT: A useful diagnostic tool for benign and malignant breast lesions.
Wei W; Yi XL; Yang J; Liao H; Su D
Acta Radiol; 2023 Aug; 64(8):2379-2386. PubMed ID: 37287251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT: Analysis of optimal acquisition time for discrimination of breast lesion malignancy.
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Surov A; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Feb; 99():9-16. PubMed ID: 29362157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.
Uhlig J; Uhlig A; Biggemann L; Fischer U; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Mar; 29(3):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 30255249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Biggemann L; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3141-3148. PubMed ID: 30488110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast].
Liu AD; Ma Y; Yin L; Han P; Li HJ; Ye ZX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 40(8):604-609. PubMed ID: 30139031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-Enhanced Cone-Beam Breast CT: An Analysis of Diagnostic Value in Predicting Breast Lesion With Rim Enhancement Malignancy.
Zhao X; Yang J; Zuo Y; Kang W; Liao H; Zheng ZT; Su DK
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():868975. PubMed ID: 35686106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference Range of CT Value in NC-CBBCT Based on Female Breast Structure.
Wei W; Zhong W; Kang W; Zhao X; Yi X; Su D
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(13):1523-1532. PubMed ID: 36734890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone beam breast CT with multiplanar and three dimensional visualization in differentiating breast masses compared with mammography.
Zhao B; Zhang X; Cai W; Conover D; Ning R
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25439008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The cone-beam breast computed tomography characteristics of breast non-mass enhancement lesions.
Kang W; Zhong W; Su D
Acta Radiol; 2021 Oct; 62(10):1298-1308. PubMed ID: 33070636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.
Wienbeck S; Uhlig J; Luftner-Nagel S; Zapf A; Surov A; von Fintel E; Stahnke V; Lotz J; Fischer U
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5185-5195. PubMed ID: 28677053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT features of breast cancers: correlation with immunohistochemical receptors and molecular subtypes.
Ma Y; Liu A; O'Connell AM; Zhu Y; Li H; Han P; Yin L; Lu H; Ye Z
Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):2580-2589. PubMed ID: 33009590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation between contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast computed tomography features and prognostic staging in breast cancer.
Ma WM; Li J; Chen SG; Cai PQ; Chen S; Chen JT; Zhou CY; He N; Wu Y
Br J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 95(1132):20210466. PubMed ID: 34930038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI.
Ma Y; Liu A; Zhang Y; Zhu Y; Wang Y; Zhao M; Liang Z; Qu Z; Yin L; Lu H; Ye Z
Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5773-5782. PubMed ID: 35320411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe.
Wienbeck S; Lotz J; Fischer U
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():50-59. PubMed ID: 27875762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.
Tavakoli Taba S; Baran P; Nesterets YI; Pacile S; Wienbeck S; Dullin C; Pavlov K; Maksimenko A; Lockie D; Mayo SC; Quiney HM; Dreossi D; Arfelli F; Tromba G; Lewis S; Gureyev TE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 31974689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density.
Wienbeck S; Andrijevska V; Kück F; Perske C; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Fischer U; Lotz J; Kunze M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jun; 102(22):e33900. PubMed ID: 37266644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimal acquisition time to discriminate between breast cancer subtypes with contrast-enhanced cone-beam CT.
Chen JT; Zhou CY; He N; Wu YP
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Jun; 101(6):391-399. PubMed ID: 32008993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of comfort between cone beam breast computed tomography and digital mammography.
Li H; Yin L; He N; Han P; Zhu Y; Ma Y; Liu A; Lu H; Gao Z; Liu P; Wu Y; Ye Z
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108674. PubMed ID: 31557718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Head-to-head comparison of cone-beam breast computed tomography and mammography in the diagnosis of primary breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang L; Zhou Z; Wang J; Lin Q; Dong Y; Guo Z; Shi F
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Feb; 171():111292. PubMed ID: 38211395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
