These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37287261)

  • 1. Visual Complexity of Head-Up Display in Automobiles Modulates Attentional Tunneling.
    Lee J; Lee N; Ju J; Chae J; Park J; Ryu HS; Cho YS
    Hum Factors; 2024 Jul; 66(7):1879-1892. PubMed ID: 37287261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of background scene complexity and field dependence on the legibility of head-up displays for automotive applications.
    Ward NJ; Parkes A; Crone PR
    Hum Factors; 1995 Dec; 37(4):735-45. PubMed ID: 8851776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Isolating the Effect of Off-Road Glance Duration on Driving Performance: An Exemplar Study Comparing HDD and HUD in Different Driving Scenarios.
    Smith M; Bagalkotkar K; Gabbard JL; Large DR; Burnett G
    Hum Factors; 2023 Aug; 65(5):833-845. PubMed ID: 34292078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drivers' Visual Search Behavior Toward Vulnerable Road Users at Junctions as a Function of Cycling Experience.
    Robbins CJ; Chapman P
    Hum Factors; 2018 Nov; 60(7):889-901. PubMed ID: 29906399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nonuniform Changes in the Distribution of Visual Attention from Visual Complexity and Action: A Driving Simulation Study.
    Park GD; Reed CL
    Perception; 2015 Feb; 44(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 26561967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of a simulated head-up display speedometer on perceptual task performance.
    Sojourner RJ; Antin JF
    Hum Factors; 1990 Jun; 32(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 2258179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automotive HUDs: the overlooked safety issues.
    Tufano DR
    Hum Factors; 1997 Jun; 39(2):303-11. PubMed ID: 9302890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced perception and performance by multimodal threat cueing in simulated combat vehicle.
    Oskarsson PA; Eriksson L; Carlander O
    Hum Factors; 2012 Feb; 54(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 22409107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inattentional blindness to unexpected hazard in augmented reality head-up display assisted driving: The impact of the relative position between stimulus and augmented graph.
    Chen W; Song J; Wang Y; Wu C; Ma S; Wang D; Yang Z; Li H
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):344-351. PubMed ID: 36939683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Driving While Interacting With Google Glass: Investigating the Combined Effect of Head-Up Display and Hands-Free Input on Driving Safety and Multitask Performance.
    Tippey KG; Sivaraj E; Ferris TK
    Hum Factors; 2017 Jun; 59(4):671-688. PubMed ID: 28186420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In-Car Environment Control Using an SSVEP-Based Brain-Computer Interface with Visual Stimuli Presented on Head-Up Display: Performance Comparison with a Button-Press Interface.
    Park S; Kim M; Nam H; Kwon J; Im CH
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jan; 24(2):. PubMed ID: 38257638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The influence of cognition and age on accommodation, detection rate and response times when using a car head-up display (HUD).
    Wolffsohn JS; McBrien NA; Edgar GK; Stout T
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1998 May; 18(3):243-53. PubMed ID: 9829111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing Distraction Potential of Augmented Reality Head-Up Displays for Vehicle Drivers.
    Kim H; Gabbard JL
    Hum Factors; 2022 Aug; 64(5):852-865. PubMed ID: 31063399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of different AR-HUD virtual warning interfaces on the takeover performance and visual characteristics of autonomous vehicles.
    Jing C; Shang C; Yu D; Chen Y; Zhi J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(5):277-282. PubMed ID: 35442130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
    Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Effects of Cognitive and Visual Workload on Peripheral Detection in the Detection Response Task.
    van Winsum W
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):855-869. PubMed ID: 29791188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of visual complexity of in-vehicle information display: Age-related differences in visual search task in the driving context.
    Lee SC; Kim YW; Ji YG
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102888. PubMed ID: 31422256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two visual systems in monitoring of dynamic traffic: effects of visual disruption.
    Zheng XS; McConkie GW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 May; 42(3):921-8. PubMed ID: 20380921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sonification of in-vehicle interface reduces gaze movements under dual-task condition.
    Tardieu J; Misdariis N; Langlois S; Gaillard P; Lemercier C
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Sep; 50():41-9. PubMed ID: 25959316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.