These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3728764)
1. Significance tests represent consensus and standard practice. Walker AM Am J Public Health; 1986 Aug; 76(8):1033-4. PubMed ID: 3728764 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Confidence intervals vs significance tests: quantitative interpretation. Fleiss JL Am J Public Health; 1986 May; 76(5):587-8. PubMed ID: 3963291 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reevaluation of the problem of multiple significance]. Ahlbom A; Adami HO Lakartidningen; 1991 Jan; 88(4):201-2, 207. PubMed ID: 1994156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Quality of clinical information (II): Statistical significance]. Plasencia A; Porta Serra M Med Clin (Barc); 1988 Jan; 90(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 3280891 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Significance of the hospital responsibility area for comparative autopsy statistics]. Poche R Beitr Pathol; 1972 Jun; 146(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 5054747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reconciling theory and practice regarding p values. Savitz DA Epidemiology; 2013 Sep; 24(5):781-2. PubMed ID: 23903887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconciling theory and practice regarding p values. Stang A Epidemiology; 2013 Sep; 24(5):781. PubMed ID: 23903886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The case-control study: consensus and controversy. Final discussion by all participants. J Chronic Dis; 1979; 32(1-2):117-37. PubMed ID: 312802 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical observations and bias. Horwitz O; Lysgaard-Hansen B Am J Epidemiol; 1975 May; 101(5):391-9. PubMed ID: 1130402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Commentary: reconciling theory and practice: what is to be done with p values? Savitz DA Epidemiology; 2013 Mar; 24(2):212-4. PubMed ID: 23377090 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Statistical criteria in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. Thompson WD Am J Public Health; 1987 Feb; 77(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 3799859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On sample-size and power calculations for studies using confidence intervals. Greenland S Am J Epidemiol; 1988 Jul; 128(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 3381829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical biostatistics. LI. Quantitative significance and statistical indexes for a contrast of two groups. Feinstein AR Clin Pharmacol Ther; 1980 Apr; 27(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 7357816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Paradigms and pragmatism: approaches to medical statistics. Healy MJ Ann Ig; 2000; 12(4):257-64. PubMed ID: 11140091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of the logistic analysis of epidemiologic data. Greenland S Am J Epidemiol; 1979 Dec; 110(6):693-8. PubMed ID: 555587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [I. Evaluation of the efficacy of a clinical intervention]. Epidemiol Prev; 1989; 11(40-41):3-23. PubMed ID: 2534527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Design options in epidemiologic research. An update. Miettinen O Scand J Work Environ Health; 1982; 8 Suppl 1():7-14. PubMed ID: 6980462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of correlation coefficients in epidemiologic analysis. Mulder PG J Chronic Dis; 1984; 37(6):503. PubMed ID: 6725503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]