These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37288488)

  • 1. Estimation of Aquifer Transmissivity From Analysis of Long-Term Monitoring With the Thiem Solution.
    Henry JC; Neville CJ; Olson AN
    Ground Water; 2024; 62(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 37288488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Groundwater Level Fluctuations near an Operating Water Supply Well to Estimate Aquifer Transmissivity.
    Pozdniakov S; Ivanov P; Davis P; Sizov N
    Ground Water; 2021 Jan; 59(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 32588432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How to Find Aquifer Statistics Utilizing Pumping Tests? Two Field Studies Using welltestpy.
    Müller S; Leven C; Dietrich P; Attinger S; Zech A
    Ground Water; 2022 Jan; 60(1):137-144. PubMed ID: 34231221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interpretation of Pumping Tests in Heterogeneous Aquifers with Constant Head Boundary.
    Pechstein A; Copty NK
    Ground Water; 2021 Jul; 59(4):517-523. PubMed ID: 33389747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of aquifer hydraulic conductivity and transmissivity of Ezza/Ikwo area, Southeastern Nigeria, using pumping test and surficial resistivity techniques.
    Oli IC; Opara AI; Okeke OC; Akaolisa CZ; Akakuru OC; Osi-Okeke I; Udeh HM
    Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Sep; 194(10):719. PubMed ID: 36053394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving estimates of groundwater velocity in a fractured rock borehole using hydraulic and tracer dilution methods.
    Maldaner CH; Quinn PM; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jul; 214():75-86. PubMed ID: 29907430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An inverse procedure to estimate transmissivity from heads and SP signals.
    Straface S; Fallico C; Troisi S; Rizzo E; Revil A
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):420-8. PubMed ID: 17600572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cokriging Transmissivity, Head and Trajectory Data for Transmissivity and Solute Path Estimation.
    Butera I; Soffia C
    Ground Water; 2017 May; 55(3):362-374. PubMed ID: 27861818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating Aquifer Properties Using Derivative Analysis of Water Level Time Series from Active Well Fields.
    Lewis AR; Ronayne MJ; Sale TC
    Ground Water; 2016 May; 54(3):414-24. PubMed ID: 26340251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for the interpretation of pumping tests in leaky aquifers.
    Trinchero P; Sanchez-Vila X; Copty N; Findikakis A
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 18181872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Determination of storage coefficients during pumping and recovery.
    Ashjari J
    Ground Water; 2013; 51(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22372656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Solutions for Groundwater Flow to a Pumping Well with an Exponentially Decreasing Variable-Rate in a Sloping Aquifer.
    Guo Z; Wen Z; Jakada H
    Ground Water; 2022 Nov; 60(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 35388495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A literature review on pumping test analysis (2000-2022).
    Dashti Z; Nakhaei M; Vadiati M; Karami GH; Kisi O
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(4):9184-9206. PubMed ID: 36454527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A New Solution for Confined-Unconfined Flow Toward a Fully Penetrating Well in a Confined Aquifer.
    Xiao L; Ye M; Xu Y
    Ground Water; 2018 Nov; 56(6):959-968. PubMed ID: 29417577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Small-Scale ASR Between Flow Barriers in a Saline Aquifer.
    van Ginkel M; des Tombe B; Olsthoorn T; Bakker M
    Ground Water; 2016 Nov; 54(6):840-850. PubMed ID: 27144471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Simplified Solution Using Izbash's Equation for Non-Darcian Flow in a Constant Rate Pumping Test.
    Xiao L; Ye M; Xu Y; Gan F
    Ground Water; 2019 Nov; 57(6):962-968. PubMed ID: 30937895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New method for continuous transmissivity profiling in fractured rock.
    Keller CE; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 23692626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling the Factors Impacting Pesticide Concentrations in Groundwater Wells.
    Aisopou A; Binning PJ; Albrechtsen HJ; Bjerg PL
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(5):722-36. PubMed ID: 25243476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Parameter estimation/sensitivity analysis for an aquifer test with skin effect.
    Chen YJ; Yeh HD
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 19210564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Groundwater modeling of Saq Aquifer Buraydah Al Qassim for better water management strategies.
    Al-Salamah IS; Ghazaw YM; Ghumman AR
    Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Feb; 173(1-4):851-60. PubMed ID: 20364311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.