114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37290672)
1. Benchmarking Tests of Contemporary SRS Platforms: Have Technological Developments Resulted in Improved Treatment Plan Quality?
Paddick I; Mott J; Bedford J; Filatov P; Grishchuk D; Orchin G; Houston P; Eaton DJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2023; 13(5):e451-e459. PubMed ID: 37290672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct dosimetric comparison of linear accelerator vs. Gamma Knife fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) of large brain tumors.
Calugaru E; Whiting Z; Delacruz B; Ma D; Garcia B; Goenka A; Chang J
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):31-36. PubMed ID: 36503990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric characterization of hypofractionated Gamma Knife radiosurgery of large or complex brain tumors versus linear accelerator-based treatments.
Dong P; Pérez-Andújar A; Pinnaduwage D; Braunstein S; Theodosopoulos P; McDermott M; Sneed P; Ma L
J Neurosurg; 2016 Dec; 125(Suppl 1):97-103. PubMed ID: 27903198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hippocampal-sparing and target volume coverage in treating 3 to 10 brain metastases: A comparison of Gamma Knife, single-isocenter VMAT, CyberKnife, and TomoTherapy stereotactic radiosurgery.
Zhang I; Antone J; Li J; Saha S; Riegel AC; Vijeh L; Lauritano J; Marrero M; Salas S; Schulder M; Zinkin H; Goenka A; Knisely J
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(3):183-189. PubMed ID: 28477798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of single isocenter linear accelerator radiosurgery for metastases and base of skull lesions.
Bossart E; Mellon EA; Monterroso I; Elsayyad N; Diwanji T; Samuels S; Dogan N
Phys Med; 2021 Jan; 81():1-8. PubMed ID: 33278764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases.
Han EY; Wang H; Luo D; Li J; Wang X
J Neurosurg; 2019 Apr; 132(5):1473-1479. PubMed ID: 30952125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: Results of multicenter benchmark planning studies.
Eaton DJ; Lee J; Paddick I
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(4):e212-e220. PubMed ID: 29452865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Plan quality assessment of modern radiosurgery technologies in the treatment of multiple brain metastases.
Hiscoke K; Leong A; Hogan AM; Cowley I
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 38262047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions: comparison between a conventional multi-isocenter approach and a new dedicated mono-isocenter technique.
Ruggieri R; Naccarato S; Mazzola R; Ricchetti F; Corradini S; Fiorentino A; Alongi F
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Mar; 13(1):38. PubMed ID: 29506539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric quality and delivery efficiency of robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Comparison with C-arm linear accelerator based plans.
Zhang S; Yang R; Wang X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):104-110. PubMed ID: 31580532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of radiation dose spillage from the Gamma Knife Perfexion with that from volumetric modulated arc radiosurgery during treatment of multiple brain metastases in a single fraction.
McDonald D; Schuler J; Takacs I; Peng J; Jenrette J; Vanek K
J Neurosurg; 2014 Dec; 121 Suppl():51-9. PubMed ID: 25434937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated noncoplanar treatment planning strategy in stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple cranial metastases: HyperArc and CyberKnife dose distributions.
Kadoya N; Abe Y; Kajikawa T; Ito K; Yamamoto T; Umezawa R; Chiba T; Katsuta Y; Takayama Y; Kato T; Kikuchi Y; Jingu K
Med Dosim; 2019 Winter; 44(4):394-400. PubMed ID: 30827765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stereotactic radiosurgery for benign brain tumors: Results of multicenter benchmark planning studies.
Eaton DJ; Lee J; Patel R; Millin AE; Paddick I; Walker C
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2018; 8(5):e295-e304. PubMed ID: 29884596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy with TrueBeam LINAC and hypofractionated radiosurgery with gamma knife ICON for large (>10 cm3) skull base meningiomas.
Saglam Y; Samanci Y; Bolukbasi Y; Peker S
J Xray Sci Technol; 2022; 30(6):1201-1211. PubMed ID: 36189527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of collimator angle on HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery planning for single and multiple brain metastases.
Ohira S; Sagawa T; Ueda Y; Inui S; Masaoka A; Akino Y; Mizuno H; Miyazaki M; Koizumi M; Teshima T
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 31378401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between the HyperArc™ technique and the CyberKnife® technique for stereotactic treatment of brain metastases.
Guinement L; Salleron J; Buchheit I; Gérard K; Faivre JC; Royer P; Marchesi V
Cancer Radiother; 2023 Apr; 27(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 36797159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fractionated SRT using VMAT and Gamma Knife for brain metastases and gliomas--a planning study.
Huss M; Barsoum P; Dodoo E; Sinclair G; Toma-Dasu I
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):3-16. PubMed ID: 26699547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric performance of two linear accelerator-based radiosurgery systems to treat single and multiplebrain metastases.
Ueda Y; Ohira S; Yamazaki H; Mabuchi N; Higashinaka N; Miyazaki M; Teshima T
Br J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 92(1100):20190004. PubMed ID: 31188018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics.
Chea M; Fezzani K; Jacob J; Cuttat M; Croisé M; Simon JM; Feuvret L; Valery CA; Maingon P; Benadjaoud MA; Jenny C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Feb; 16(1):45. PubMed ID: 33639959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
