162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37291493)
1. Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Wu G; Liu J; Zhang Y; Yang W; Wang X; Duan L; Niu L; Chen J; Zhou W; Han W; Wang J; Zhong H; Ji G; Fan D; Hong L
BMC Cancer; 2023 Jun; 23(1):523. PubMed ID: 37291493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Log odds of positive lymph nodes as a novel prognostic predictor for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Li Y; Wu G; Zhang Y; Han B; Yang W; Wang X; Duan L; Niu L; Chen J; Zhou W; Liu J; Fan D; Hong L
BMC Cancer; 2022 Mar; 22(1):290. PubMed ID: 35303818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Log odds of positive lymph nodes: a novel prognostic indicator superior to the number-based and the ratio-based N category for gastric cancer patients with R0 resection.
Sun Z; Xu Y; Li de M; Wang ZN; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Li K; Xu HM
Cancer; 2010 Jun; 116(11):2571-80. PubMed ID: 20336791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Log odds of positive lymph nodes in colon cancer: a meaningful ratio-based lymph node classification system.
Persiani R; Cananzi FC; Biondi A; Paliani G; Tufo A; Ferrara F; Vigorita V; D'Ugo D
World J Surg; 2012 Mar; 36(3):667-74. PubMed ID: 22270984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Different lymph node staging systems in patients with gastric cancer from Korean: What is the best prognostic assessment tool?
Lee JW; Ali B; Park CH; Song KY
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 Jun; 95(25):e3860. PubMed ID: 27336871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in colon and rectal cancer patient stratification: a single-center analysis of 323 patients.
Scarinci A; Di Cesare T; Cavaniglia D; Neri T; Colletti M; Cosenza G; Liverani A
Updates Surg; 2018 Mar; 70(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 29500795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Superiority of log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) for prognostic prediction after gastric cancer surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 7620 patients in China.
Gu P; Deng J; Sun Z; Wang Z; Wang W; Liang H; Xu H; Zhou Z
Surg Today; 2021 Jan; 51(1):101-110. PubMed ID: 32754844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparison of three lymph node staging systems in predicting overall survival for gastric cancer patients after radical resection].
Luo C; Zhang G; Wang W; Zhou Z; Zhang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 19(10):1107-1112. PubMed ID: 27781245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparisons of different lymph node staging systems for predicting overall survival of node-positive patients with renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.
Zheng W; Jiang W; Wu Q; Chen J; Zhang Z; Yu S; Guo C
BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e068044. PubMed ID: 37185648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems.
Cao H; Tang Z; Yu Z; Wang Q; Li Z; Lu Q; Wu Y
Oncol Lett; 2019 Jan; 17(1):1299-1305. PubMed ID: 30655898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Prognostic Ability of Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Lee CC; Ho HC; Su YC; Lee MS; Hung SK; Chen YL
Medicine (Baltimore); 2015 Jul; 94(27):e1069. PubMed ID: 26166079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prognostic role of the log odds of positive lymph nodes in Western patients with resected gastric cancer: A comparison with the 8th edition of the TNM staging system.
Díaz Del Arco C; Estrada Muñoz L; Sánchez Pernaute A; Ortega Medina L; García Gómez de Las Heras S; García Martínez R; Fernández Aceñero MJ
Am J Clin Pathol; 2024 Feb; 161(2):186-196. PubMed ID: 37901915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic assessment of different lymph node staging methods for pancreatic cancer with R0 resection: pN staging, lymph node ratio, log odds of positive lymph nodes.
La Torre M; Nigri G; Petrucciani N; Cavallini M; Aurello P; Cosenza G; Balducci G; Ziparo V; Ramacciato G
Pancreatology; 2014; 14(4):289-94. PubMed ID: 25062879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic assessment of different metastatic lymph node staging methods for gastric cancer after D2 resection.
Xu J; Bian YH; Jin X; Cao H
World J Gastroenterol; 2013 Mar; 19(12):1975-83. PubMed ID: 23569344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS): what are their role in the prognostic assessment of gastric adenocarcinoma?
Aurello P; Petrucciani N; Nigri GR; La Torre M; Magistri P; Tierno S; D'Angelo F; Ramacciato G
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Jul; 18(7):1254-60. PubMed ID: 24841441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is prognostically equivalent to lymph node ratio in non-metastatic colon cancer.
Baqar AR; Wilkins S; Wang W; Oliva K; McMurrick P
BMC Cancer; 2020 Aug; 20(1):762. PubMed ID: 32795292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Which is the most suitable classification for colorectal cancer, log odds, the number or the ratio of positive lymph nodes?
Song YX; Gao P; Wang ZN; Tong LL; Xu YY; Sun Z; Xing CZ; Xu HM
PLoS One; 2011; 6(12):e28937. PubMed ID: 22174929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of three lymph node classifications for survival prediction in distant metastatic gastric cancer.
Zhou R; Zhang J; Sun H; Liao Y; Liao W
Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():165-171. PubMed ID: 27713088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of the nodal ratio in gastric cancer: unicentric analysis of 199 patients.
Villalabeitia Ateca I; Perfecto Valero A; Serrano Hermosilla C; Marcaida Salazar A; Pérez Fernández S; Sarriugarte Lasarte A
Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2022 May; 100(5):266-273. PubMed ID: 35487434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a novel prognostic indicator for advanced ESCC after surgical resection.
Yang M; Zhang H; Ma Z; Gong L; Chen C; Ren P; Shang X; Tang P; Jiang H; Yu Z
J Thorac Dis; 2017 May; 9(5):1182-1189. PubMed ID: 28616267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
