These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37293929)

  • 1. Impact of auditory environments on language outcomes in children with a cochlear implant.
    Poupore NS; Chidarala S; Morris NS; McRackan TR; Schvartz-Leyzac KC
    Int J Audiol; 2024 Jul; 63(7):510-518. PubMed ID: 37293929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pediatric cochlear implant wear time and early language development.
    Gagnon EB; Eskridge H; Brown KD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Mar; 21(2):92-97. PubMed ID: 31566100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial hearing in a child with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder and bilateral cochlear implants.
    Johnstone PM; Yeager KR; Noss E
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):400-8. PubMed ID: 23586418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spoken language and everyday functioning in 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Cupples L; Ching TY; Button L; Seeto M; Zhang V; Whitfield J; Gunnourie M; Martin L; Marnane V
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S55-S69. PubMed ID: 28899200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users.
    Bonnard D; Schwalje A; Gantz B; Choi I
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():223-230. PubMed ID: 29980380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Ching TY; Zhang VW; Flynn C; Burns L; Button L; Hou S; McGhie K; Van Buynder P
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S70-S80. PubMed ID: 28687057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of differential listening experience on the development of expressive and receptive language in children with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Hess C; Zettler-Greeley C; Godar SP; Ellis-Weismer S; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(4):387-95. PubMed ID: 24496290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants: A systematic review.
    Chen Y; Wong LLN
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S7-S16. PubMed ID: 28296526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjustments of the amplitude mapping function: Sensitivity of cochlear implant users and effects on subjective preference and speech recognition.
    Theelen-van den Hoek FL; Boymans M; van Dijk B; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):674-87. PubMed ID: 27447758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Why and how music can be used to rehabilitate and develop speech and language skills in hearing-impaired children.
    Torppa R; Huotilainen M
    Hear Res; 2019 Sep; 380():108-122. PubMed ID: 31265971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parent perceptions of their child's communication and academic experiences with cochlear implants.
    Nelson LH; Herde L; Munoz K; White KR; Page MD
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):164-173. PubMed ID: 27780377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does Auditory Environment Predict Speech Perception Outcomes in Elderly Cochlear Implant Patients?
    Chow K; Kaul VF; Levine-Madoff J; Wanna GB; Cosetti MK
    Audiol Neurootol; 2021; 26(5):378-386. PubMed ID: 33951634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Speech processor data logging helps in predicting early linguistic outcomes in implanted children.
    Guerzoni L; Cuda D
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Oct; 101():81-86. PubMed ID: 28964316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors Affecting Daily Cochlear Implant Use in Children: Datalogging Evidence.
    Easwar V; Sanfilippo J; Papsin B; Gordon K
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016; 27(10):824-838. PubMed ID: 27885978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of speech recognition abilities in quiet and in noise: a comparison between self-administered home testing and testing in the clinic for adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Huysmans E; Merkus P; Theo Goverts S; Smits C
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):872-880. PubMed ID: 30261772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech perception in tones and noise via cochlear implants reveals influence of spectral resolution on temporal processing.
    Oxenham AJ; Kreft HA
    Trends Hear; 2014 Oct; 18():. PubMed ID: 25315376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perception of prosody and associated auditory cues in early-implanted children: the role of auditory working memory and musical activities.
    Torppa R; Faulkner A; Huotilainen M; Järvikivi J; Lipsanen J; Laasonen M; Vainio M
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Mar; 53(3):182-91. PubMed ID: 24460045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.