200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37294355)
1. Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Wang S; Hu M; Wang S; Qi H; Song D; Jiang H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4617-4631. PubMed ID: 37294355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparative assessment of mechanical property between lingual and labial archwires using three-dimension finite element method].
He S; Chen ZY; Yang SW; Huang Y
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Dec; 24(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 27063115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets.
Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23678999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research paper: The three-dimensional mechanical response of orthodontic archwires and brackets in vitro during simulated orthodontic torque.
Tran B; Nobes DS; Major PW; Carey JP; Romanyk DL
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104196. PubMed ID: 33221162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium-molybdenum alloy closing loop archwires using numeric simulation model based on finite element method.
Mall V; Bhosale V; Vichare G; Patil A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Nov; 164(5):e129-e138. PubMed ID: 37656072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types.
Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4049-4057. PubMed ID: 35092503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of torque induced orthodontic bracket slot deformation in various bracket-archwire contact assembly.
Harikrishnan P; Magesh V; Ajayan AM; JebaSingh DK
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105748. PubMed ID: 32932130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations.
De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA
Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of tie wings rotation: A new phenomenon in orthodontic bracket-archwire contact assembly during simulated torque.
Harikrishnan P; Magesh V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Nov; 236(11):1626-1634. PubMed ID: 36169309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations.
Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lever arm on bracket vs. lever arm on archwire: A 3D finite element method study of mechanics of miniscrew-supported lingual en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth.
Wu ZM; Li BX; Wang DC; Liu YF; Dong XT; Jiang XF
Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100791. PubMed ID: 37454531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets.
Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F
Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets.
Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical analysis of the improved superelastic Ni-Ti alloy wire using the orthodontic simulator with high-precision sensors.
Mikami N; Yonemitsu I; Takemura H; Kondou M; Soga K; Suga K; Kanno Z; Lai W; Uo M; Ono T
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105861. PubMed ID: 37146519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative finite element analysis of bracket deformation in tie wings and slot region during simulated torque.
Harikrishnan P; Magesh V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):588-593. PubMed ID: 34373152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
