These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37294355)
1. Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Wang S; Hu M; Wang S; Qi H; Song D; Jiang H Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Aug; 27(8):4617-4631. PubMed ID: 37294355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [A comparative assessment of mechanical property between lingual and labial archwires using three-dimension finite element method]. He S; Chen ZY; Yang SW; Huang Y Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2015 Dec; 24(6):660-6. PubMed ID: 27063115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Torque efficiency of different archwires in 0.018- and 0.022-inch conventional brackets. Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Makou M; Eliades T; Katsaros C; Bourauel C Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):149-54. PubMed ID: 23678999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research paper: The three-dimensional mechanical response of orthodontic archwires and brackets in vitro during simulated orthodontic torque. Tran B; Nobes DS; Major PW; Carey JP; Romanyk DL J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2021 Feb; 114():104196. PubMed ID: 33221162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of stainless steel and titanium-molybdenum alloy closing loop archwires using numeric simulation model based on finite element method. Mall V; Bhosale V; Vichare G; Patil A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Nov; 164(5):e129-e138. PubMed ID: 37656072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative in vitro analysis of the sliding resistance of a modern 3D-printed polymer bracket in combination with different archwire types. Hodecker L; Bourauel C; Braumann B; Kruse T; Christ H; Scharf S Clin Oral Investig; 2022 May; 26(5):4049-4057. PubMed ID: 35092503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of archwire cross-section changes on force levels during complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; Keilig L; El-Bialy T; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4 Suppl):S101-8. PubMed ID: 25836341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite element analysis of torque induced orthodontic bracket slot deformation in various bracket-archwire contact assembly. Harikrishnan P; Magesh V; Ajayan AM; JebaSingh DK Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105748. PubMed ID: 32932130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Frictional resistances using Teflon-coated ligatures with various bracket-archwire combinations. De Franco DJ; Spiller RE; von Fraunhofer JA Angle Orthod; 1995; 65(1):63-72; discussion 73-4. PubMed ID: 7726464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Finite element analysis of tie wings rotation: A new phenomenon in orthodontic bracket-archwire contact assembly during simulated torque. Harikrishnan P; Magesh V Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 Nov; 236(11):1626-1634. PubMed ID: 36169309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations. Montasser MA; Keilig L; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26718381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lever arm on bracket vs. lever arm on archwire: A 3D finite element method study of mechanics of miniscrew-supported lingual en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Wu ZM; Li BX; Wang DC; Liu YF; Dong XT; Jiang XF Int Orthod; 2023 Dec; 21(4):100791. PubMed ID: 37454531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparative study of the static and kinetic frictional resistance of titanium molybdenum alloy archwires in stainless steel brackets. Cash A; Curtis R; Garrigia-Majo D; McDonald F Eur J Orthod; 2004 Feb; 26(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 14994890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Force levels in complex tooth alignment with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Montasser MA; El-Bialy T; Keilig L; Reimann S; Jäger A; Bourauel C Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Apr; 143(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 23561412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis. Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study. Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments. Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination. Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical analysis of the improved superelastic Ni-Ti alloy wire using the orthodontic simulator with high-precision sensors. Mikami N; Yonemitsu I; Takemura H; Kondou M; Soga K; Suga K; Kanno Z; Lai W; Uo M; Ono T J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Jun; 142():105861. PubMed ID: 37146519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative finite element analysis of bracket deformation in tie wings and slot region during simulated torque. Harikrishnan P; Magesh V Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Oct; 160(4):588-593. PubMed ID: 34373152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]