These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37295196)

  • 1. On why we lack confidence in some signal-detection-based analyses of confidence.
    Arnold DH; Johnston A; Adie J; Yarrow K
    Conscious Cogn; 2023 Aug; 113():103532. PubMed ID: 37295196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measures of metacognition on signal-detection theoretic models.
    Barrett AB; Dienes Z; Seth AK
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Dec; 18(4):535-52. PubMed ID: 24079931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The precision test of metacognitive sensitivity and confidence criteria.
    Arnold DH; Clendinen M; Johnston A; Lee ALF; Yarrow K
    Conscious Cogn; 2024 Aug; 123():103728. PubMed ID: 39018832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. HMeta-d: hierarchical Bayesian estimation of metacognitive efficiency from confidence ratings.
    Fleming SM
    Neurosci Conscious; 2017; 2017(1):nix007. PubMed ID: 29877507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the assumptions behind metacognitive measurements: Implications for theory and practice.
    Miyoshi K; Sakamoto Y; Nishida S
    J Vis; 2022 Sep; 22(10):18. PubMed ID: 36149676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings.
    Maniscalco B; Lau H
    Conscious Cogn; 2012 Mar; 21(1):422-30. PubMed ID: 22071269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How experimental procedures influence estimates of metacognitive ability.
    Rahnev D; Fleming SM
    Neurosci Conscious; 2019; 2019(1):niz009. PubMed ID: 31198586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are the contributions of processing experience and prior beliefs to confidence ratings domain-general or domain-specific?
    Hu X; Yang C; Luo L
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2023 Jan; 152(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 35708950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Metacognition across sensory modalities: Vision, warmth, and nociceptive pain.
    Beck B; Peña-Vivas V; Fleming S; Haggard P
    Cognition; 2019 May; 186():32-41. PubMed ID: 30739057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metacognitive sensitivity of subjective reports of decisional confidence and visual experience.
    Rausch M; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Sep; 35():192-205. PubMed ID: 25758187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Signal Detection Measures Cannot Distinguish Perceptual Biases from Response Biases.
    Witt JK; Taylor JE; Sugovic M; Wixted JT
    Perception; 2015 Mar; 44(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 26562253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverse engineering of metacognition.
    Guggenmos M
    Elife; 2022 Sep; 11():. PubMed ID: 36107147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sources of Metacognitive Inefficiency.
    Shekhar M; Rahnev D
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2021 Jan; 25(1):12-23. PubMed ID: 33214066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The nature of metacognitive inefficiency in perceptual decision making.
    Shekhar M; Rahnev D
    Psychol Rev; 2021 Jan; 128(1):45-70. PubMed ID: 32673034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Domain-specific impairment in metacognitive accuracy following anterior prefrontal lesions.
    Fleming SM; Ryu J; Golfinos JG; Blackmon KE
    Brain; 2014 Oct; 137(Pt 10):2811-22. PubMed ID: 25100039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring quantitative measures in metacognition of emotion.
    Lee HH; Liu GK; Chen YC; Yeh SL
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1990. PubMed ID: 38263192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the independence of visual awareness and metacognition: a signal detection theoretic analysis.
    Jachs B; Blanco MJ; Grantham-Hill S; Soto D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Apr; 41(2):269-276. PubMed ID: 25665083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Limited Cognitive Resources Explain a Trade-Off between Perceptual and Metacognitive Vigilance.
    Maniscalco B; McCurdy LY; Odegaard B; Lau H
    J Neurosci; 2017 Feb; 37(5):1213-1224. PubMed ID: 28028197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heuristic use of perceptual evidence leads to dissociation between performance and metacognitive sensitivity.
    Maniscalco B; Peters MA; Lau H
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Apr; 78(3):923-37. PubMed ID: 26791233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Post-decision wagering after perceptual judgments reveals bi-directional certainty readouts.
    Moreira CM; Rollwage M; Kaduk K; Wilke M; Kagan I
    Cognition; 2018 Jul; 176():40-52. PubMed ID: 29544114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.