149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37295359)
1. Frontal-oblique impact sled tests of a rearward-facing child restraint system with and without a support leg.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107137. PubMed ID: 37295359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactions between rearward-facing child restraint systems and the front row seatback in frontal impact sled tests.
Patton DA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S99-S104. PubMed ID: 35713941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rearward-Facing Infant Child Restraint Systems with Support Legs in Frontal and Frontal-Oblique Impacts.
Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Rotation Reduction Features in Infant and Extended-Use Convertible Child Restraint Systems during Frontal and Rear Impacts.
Patton DA; Belwadi AN; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Stapp Car Crash J; 2020 Nov; 64():61-81. PubMed ID: 33636003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative performance of forward-facing child restraint systems on the C/FMVSS 213 bench and vehicle seats.
Maltese MR; Tylko S; Belwadi A; Locey C; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2014; 15 Suppl 1():S103-10. PubMed ID: 25307374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Top tether effectiveness during side impacts.
Majstorovic J; Bing J; Dahle E; Bolte J; Kang YS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S146-S152. PubMed ID: 29584504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head excursions of rearward-facing child restraint systems in rear impacts.
Patton DA; Mansfield JA; Maheshwari J; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):213-217. PubMed ID: 36657143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Frontal and oblique crash tests of HIII 6-year-old child ATD using real-world, observed child passenger postures.
Bohman K; Arbogast KB; Loeb H; Charlton JL; Koppel S; Cross SL
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S125-S130. PubMed ID: 29584494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A current assessment of the THOR 50M in rear impacts.
White SD; Salmon JL; Prasad P; Burnett RA; Kim A; Buckman J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):208-212. PubMed ID: 36943173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of center-mounted airbag in far-side impacts based on THOR sled tests.
Umale S; Hauschild H; Humm J; Driesslein K; Yoganandan N
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(7):726-731. PubMed ID: 31567026
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Child occupant safety in unconventional seating for vehicles with automated driving systems.
Hu J; Boyle K; Orton NR; Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107223. PubMed ID: 37480661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative performance of rearward and forward-facing child restraint systems with common use errors: Effect on crash injury risk for a 1-year-old occupant.
Whyte T; Kent N; Bilston LE; Brown J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(2):91-96. PubMed ID: 35044289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic frontal crash performance of old and used child restraint systems.
Whyte T; Kent N; Griffiths M; Bilston LE; Brown J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(7):570-575. PubMed ID: 34432557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of naturalistic seating postures and seatbelt routing on booster-seated Q6 ATD kinematics and kinetics in frontal impacts.
Maheshwari J; Griffith M; Baker G; Patton D; Mansfield J
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 189():107140. PubMed ID: 37263046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of tethering rear -facing child restraint systems on ATD responses.
Manary MA; Reed MP; Klinich KD; Ritchie NL; Schneider LW
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2006; 50():397-410. PubMed ID: 16968650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of reclined seatback angles on the motion of booster-seated children during lateral-oblique low-acceleration impacts.
Graci V; Burns Iii J; Griffith M; Seacrist T
Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107117. PubMed ID: 37216696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
