These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37296253)
1. Energy-saving and emission-reduction potential of fuel cell heavy-duty trucks in China during the fuel life cycle. Yan R; Jiang Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(33):80559-80572. PubMed ID: 37296253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact assessment of crude oil mix, electricity generation mix, and vehicle technology on road freight emission reduction in China. Jiang Z; Yan R; Gong Z; Guan G Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27763-27781. PubMed ID: 36385332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Greenhouse gas emission benefits of adopting new energy vehicles in Suzhou City, China: A case study. Da C; Gu X; Lu C; Hua R; Chang X; Cheng Y; Qian F; Wang Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Oct; 29(50):76286-76297. PubMed ID: 35668254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Life Cycle Assessment and Key Parameter Comparison of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles Power Systems]. Chen YS; Lan LB; Hao Z; Fu P Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2022 Aug; 43(8):4402-4412. PubMed ID: 35971737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of life cycle greenhouse gases from natural gas pathways for medium and heavy-duty vehicles. Tong F; Jaramillo P; Azevedo IM Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7123-33. PubMed ID: 25938939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Well-to-wheel greenhouse gas emissions of electric versus combustion vehicles from 2018 to 2030 in the US. Challa R; Kamath D; Anctil A J Environ Manage; 2022 Apr; 308():114592. PubMed ID: 35121453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Carbon Reduction Analysis of Life Cycle Prediction Assessment of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicles:Considering Regional Features and Vehicle Type Differences]. Ma J; Cai X; Zhang CM; Lan LB; Chen YS; Fu P Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2024 Feb; 45(2):744-754. PubMed ID: 38471914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Provincial Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Gasoline and Plug-in Electric Vehicles in China: Comparison from the Consumption-Based Electricity Perspective. Gan Y; Lu Z; He X; Hao C; Wang Y; Cai H; Wang M; Elgowainy A; Przesmitzki S; Bouchard J Environ Sci Technol; 2021 May; 55(10):6944-6956. PubMed ID: 33945267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does Size Matter? The Influence of Size, Load Factor, Range Autonomy, and Application Type on the Life Cycle Assessment of Current and Future Medium- and Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Sacchi R; Bauer C; Cox BL Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Apr; 55(8):5224-5235. PubMed ID: 33735568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A life-cycle comparison of alternative automobile fuels. MacLean HL; Lave LB; Lankey R; Joshi S J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2000 Oct; 50(10):1769-79. PubMed ID: 11288305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Which type of electric vehicle is worth promoting mostly in the context of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality? A case study for a metropolis in China. Yu Y; Xu H; Cheng J; Wan F; Ju L; Liu Q; Liu J Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155626. PubMed ID: 35504393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution caused by light and heavy duty vehicles with battery-electric, fuel cell-electric and catenary trucks. Breuer JL; Samsun RC; Stolten D; Peters R Environ Int; 2021 Jul; 152():106474. PubMed ID: 33711760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Well-to-Wheels Fossil Energy Consumption and CO Lin T; Wu Y; He XY; Zhang SJ; Hao JM Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2018 Aug; 39(8):3946-3953. PubMed ID: 29998705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vehicle-cycle and life-cycle analysis of medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks in the United States. Iyer RK; Kelly JC; Elgowainy A Sci Total Environ; 2023 Sep; 891():164093. PubMed ID: 37211125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alternative fuel technologies emissions for road heavy-duty trucks: a review. Teixeira ACR; Machado PG; Collaço FMA; Mouette D Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(17):20954-20969. PubMed ID: 33686605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Adoption Increases Fleet Gasoline Consumption and Greenhouse Gas Emissions under United States Corporate Average Fuel Economy Policy and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards. Jenn A; Azevedo IM; Michalek JJ Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Mar; 50(5):2165-74. PubMed ID: 26867100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Developing a carbon footprint model and environmental impact analysis of municipal solid waste transportation: A case study of Tehran, Iran. Rouhi K; Shafiepour Motlagh M; Dalir F J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Dec; 73(12):890-901. PubMed ID: 37843987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Research on carbon reduction potential of electric vehicles for low-carbon transportation and its influencing factors]. Shi XQ; Li XN; Yang JX Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2013 Jan; 34(1):385-94. PubMed ID: 23487966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Environmental and energy implications of coal-based alternative vehicle fuel pathway from the life cycle perspective. Wu J; Shang J Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Aug; 29(37):56727-56738. PubMed ID: 35347604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unregulated greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions from current technology heavy-duty vehicles. Thiruvengadam A; Besch M; Carder D; Oshinuga A; Pasek R; Hogo H; Gautam M J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1045-1060. PubMed ID: 26950051 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]