These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37297735)

  • 1. History of Mammography: Analysis of Breast Imaging Diagnostic Achievements over the Last Century.
    Nicosia L; Gnocchi G; Gorini I; Venturini M; Fontana F; Pesapane F; Abiuso I; Bozzini AC; Pizzamiglio M; Latronico A; Abbate F; Meneghetti L; Battaglia O; Pellegrino G; Cassano E
    Healthcare (Basel); 2023 May; 11(11):. PubMed ID: 37297735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Artificial intelligence for digital breast tomosynthesis: Impact on diagnostic performance, reading times, and workload in the era of personalized screening.
    Magni V; Cozzi A; Schiaffino S; Colarieti A; Sardanelli F
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Jan; 158():110631. PubMed ID: 36481480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of breast imaging: past to present.
    Joe BN; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2014 Nov; 273(2 Suppl):S23-44. PubMed ID: 25340437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Empowering breast cancer diagnosis and radiology practice: advances in artificial intelligence for contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Kinkar KK; Fields BKK; Yamashita MW; Varghese BA
    Front Radiol; 2023; 3():1326831. PubMed ID: 38249158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational Radiology in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Using Artificial Intelligence.
    Tran WT; Sadeghi-Naini A; Lu FI; Gandhi S; Meti N; Brackstone M; Rakovitch E; Curpen B
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Feb; 72(1):98-108. PubMed ID: 32865001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
    Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of adjunctive tomosynthesis on screening mammography outcomes in two widely diverse radiology practices.
    Poplack SP; Patel AK; Salter A; Langley Blanton H; Murray D; McGuire C
    Breast J; 2021 Jan; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 33274490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mammography screening: A major issue in medicine.
    Autier P; Boniol M
    Eur J Cancer; 2018 Feb; 90():34-62. PubMed ID: 29272783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art.
    Sechopoulos I; Teuwen J; Mann R
    Semin Cancer Biol; 2021 Jul; 72():214-225. PubMed ID: 32531273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Performance of MRI, Molecular Breast Imaging, and Contrast-enhanced Mammography in Women with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer.
    Sumkin JH; Berg WA; Carter GJ; Bandos AI; Chough DM; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Zuley ML; Houshmand G; Anello MI; Gur D
    Radiology; 2019 Dec; 293(3):531-540. PubMed ID: 31660801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmö Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study.
    Zackrisson S; Lång K; Rosso A; Johnson K; Dustler M; Förnvik D; Förnvik H; Sartor H; Timberg P; Tingberg A; Andersson I
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1493-1503. PubMed ID: 30322817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening programme (To-Be): a randomised, controlled trial.
    Hofvind S; Holen ÅS; Aase HS; Houssami N; Sebuødegård S; Moger TA; Haldorsen IS; Akslen LA
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Jun; 20(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 31078459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of early breast cancer: an overview and future prospects.
    Zhou XH; Gordon R
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1989; 17(3):203-55. PubMed ID: 2673660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What's new in mammography.
    Simonetti G; Cossu E; Montanaro M; Caschili C; Giuliani V
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 May; 27 Suppl 2():S234-41. PubMed ID: 9652528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Low-Dose, Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared to Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: A Feasibility Study.
    Clauser P; Baltzer PAT; Kapetas P; Hoernig M; Weber M; Leone F; Bernathova M; Helbich TH
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Aug; 52(2):589-595. PubMed ID: 32061002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emerging technologies in breast cancer detection.
    Smith AP; Hall PA; Marcello DM
    Radiol Manage; 2004; 26(4):16-24; quiz 25-7. PubMed ID: 15377106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are contrast enhanced mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis equally effective in diagnosing patients recalled from breast cancer screening?
    Siminiak N; Pasiuk-Czepczyńska A; Godlewska A; Wojtyś P; Olejnik M; Michalak J; Nowaczyk P; Gajdzis P; Godlewski D; Ruchała M; Czepczyński R
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():941312. PubMed ID: 36505843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Screening mammography for women aged 40 to 49 years at average risk for breast cancer: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2007; 7(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 23074501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.