154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37297962)
1. Development of a Statistical Shape Model and Assessment of Anatomical Shape Variations in the Hemipelvis.
van Veldhuizen WA; van der Wel H; Kuipers HY; Kraeima J; Ten Duis K; Wolterink JM; de Vries JPM; Schuurmann RCL; IJpma FFA
J Clin Med; 2023 May; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 37297962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Generation of hemipelvis surface geometry based on statistical shape modelling and contralateral mirroring.
Krishna P; Robinson DL; Bucknill A; Lee PVS
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2022 Aug; 21(4):1317-1324. PubMed ID: 35713823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3D statistical model of the pelvic ring - a CT-based statistical evaluation of anatomical variation.
Arand C; Wagner D; Richards RG; Noser H; Kamer L; Sawaguchi T; Rommens PM
J Anat; 2019 Mar; 234(3):376-383. PubMed ID: 30575034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Asymmetry of the pelvic ring evaluated by CT-based 3D statistical modeling.
Handrich K; Kamer L; Mayo K; Sawaguchi T; Noser H; Arand C; Wagner D; Rommens PM
J Anat; 2021 May; 238(5):1225-1232. PubMed ID: 33382451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison between different screening strategies to determine the statistical shape model of the pelvises for implant design.
Shih KS; Hsu CP; Liu CW; Wang LL; Hou SM; Lin SC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Sep; 178():265-273. PubMed ID: 31416554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and application of the average pelvic shape in virtual pelvic fracture reconstruction.
Ead MS; Palizi M; Jaremko JL; Westover L; Duke KK
Int J Med Robot; 2021 Apr; 17(2):e2199. PubMed ID: 33200858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative Virtual Reduction Planning Algorithm of Fractured Pelvis Based on Adaptive Templates.
Lu S; Yang Y; Li S; Zhang L; Shi B; Zhang D; Li B; Hu Y
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2023 Oct; 70(10):2943-2954. PubMed ID: 37126611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Morphometric analysis of anatomical implant forms for minimally invasive acetabular fracture osteosynthesis.
Maier D; Kamer L; Noser H; Stankovic Z; Guth A; Bäurle P; Südkamp NP; Köstler W
Comput Aided Surg; 2012; 17(5):240-8. PubMed ID: 22834925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the superior pubic ramus and supra acetabular corridors using statistical shape modelling.
De Bondt S; Carette Y; van Lenthe GH; Herteleer M
Surg Radiol Anat; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38942934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical shape model-based reconstruction of a scaled, patient-specific surface model of the pelvis from a single standard AP x-ray radiograph.
Zheng G
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1424-39. PubMed ID: 20443464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual reconstruction of unilateral pelvic fractures by using pelvic symmetry.
Ead MS; Westover L; Polege S; McClelland S; Jaremko JL; Duke KK
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Aug; 15(8):1267-1277. PubMed ID: 32249403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Atlas-based automatic planning and 3D-2D fluoroscopic guidance in pelvic trauma surgery.
Han R; Uneri A; De Silva T; Ketcha M; Goerres J; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Osgood G; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2019 May; 64(9):095022. PubMed ID: 30921783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-Dimensional Subject-Specific Knee Shape Reconstruction with Asynchronous Fluoroscopy Images Using Statistical Shape Modeling.
Lu HY; Shih KS; Lin CC; Lu TW; Li SY; Kuo HW; Hsu HC
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():736420. PubMed ID: 34746102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometric variation of the human tibia-fibula: a public dataset of tibia-fibula surface meshes and statistical shape model.
Keast M; Bonacci J; Fox A
PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14708. PubMed ID: 36811007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Planning of skull reconstruction based on a statistical shape model combined with geometric morphometrics.
Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Cornelius CP; Metzger MC; Ellis E; Probst F; Semper-Hogg W; Gass M; Schlager S
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Apr; 13(4):519-529. PubMed ID: 29080945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of predictive statistical shape models for paediatric lower limb bones.
Shi B; Barzan M; Nasseri A; Carty CP; Lloyd DG; Davico G; Maharaj JN; Diamond LE; Saxby DJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107002. PubMed ID: 35882107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical relevance of augmented statistical shape model of the scapula in the glenoid region.
Salhi A; Burdin V; Brochard S; Mutsvangwa TE; Borotikar B
Med Eng Phys; 2020 Feb; 76():88-94. PubMed ID: 31902570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A statistical shape analysis for the assessment of the main geometrical features of the distal femoral medullary canal.
Betti V; Aldieri A; Cristofolini L
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2024; 12():1250095. PubMed ID: 38659643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nonunion scaphoid bone shape prediction using iterative kernel principal polynomial shape analysis.
Zhu J; Zhao J; Luo X; Hua Z
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38497549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual reconstruction of bilateral midfacial defects by using statistical shape modeling.
Fuessinger MA; Schwarz S; Neubauer J; Cornelius CP; Gass M; Poxleitner P; Zimmerer R; Metzger MC; Schlager S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1054-1059. PubMed ID: 30982558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
