These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37299763)
1. A Workflow for Studying the Stump-Socket Interface in Persons with Transtibial Amputation through 3D Thermographic Mapping. Cutti AG; Morosato F; Gentile C; Gariboldi F; Hamoui G; Santi MG; Teti G; Gruppioni E Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 37299763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying Bone and Skin Movement in the Residual Limb-Socket Interface of Individuals With Transtibial Limb Loss Using Dynamic Stereo X-Ray: Protocol for a Lower Limb Loss Cadaver and Clinical Study. Maikos JT; Chomack JM; Herlihy DV; Paglia DN; Wetterstrand C; O'Connor JP; Hyre MJ; Loan JP; D'Andrea SE JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Apr; 13():e57329. PubMed ID: 38669065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short partial doffs of release/relock sockets may effectively stabilize limb fluid volume in prosthesis users with transtibial amputation. Lanahan CR; Coburn KA; Hafner BJ; Ballesteros D; Allyn KJ; Friedly JL; Ciol MA; Carter RV; Mertens JC; Krout AJ; Sanders JE Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2023 Jun; 106():105986. PubMed ID: 37210769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. COMBINED EFFECT OF THERMAL LOAD AND MECHANICAL LOAD IN TRANSTIBIAL PROSTHESIS. AN EMPIRICAL STUDY. Filep R; Ilea M; Turnea M; Arotăriţei D; Rotariu M; Popescu M Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2016; 120(1):186-91. PubMed ID: 27125094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interface Pressure System to Compare the Functional Performance of Prosthetic Sockets during the Gait in People with Trans-Tibial Amputation. Ibarra Aguila S; Sánchez GJ; Sauvain EE; Alemon B; Fuentes-Aguilar RQ; Huegel JC Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33317006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of the scale reduction in designing sockets for trans-tibial amputees. Dakhil N; Tarrade T; Behr M; Mo F; Evin M; Thefenne L; Liu T; Llari M Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2020 Aug; 234(8):761-768. PubMed ID: 32475295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A qualitative study on stakeholder perceptions of digital prosthetic socket fabrication for transtibial amputations. Mayo AL; Gould S; Cimino SR; Glasford S; Harvey E; Ratto M; Hitzig SL Prosthet Orthot Int; 2022 Dec; 46(6):607-613. PubMed ID: 36515905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Temperature measurement and control system for transtibial prostheses: Single subject clinical evaluation. Ghoseiri K; Zheng YP; Leung AKL; Rahgozar M; Aminian G; Masoumi M; Safari MR Assist Technol; 2018; 30(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 28055332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Socket size adjustments in people with transtibial amputation: Effects on residual limb fluid volume and limb-socket distance. McLean JB; Redd CB; Larsen BG; Garbini JL; Brzostowski JT; Hafner BJ; Sanders JE Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Mar; 63():161-171. PubMed ID: 30901641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Registering methodology for imaging and analysis of residual-limb shape after transtibial amputation. Dickinson AS; Steer JW; Woods CJ; Worsley PR J Rehabil Res Dev; 2016; 53(2):207-18. PubMed ID: 27148905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of pressure distributions between two types of sockets in a bulbous stump. Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Eshraghi A; Arifin N; Chung TY Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Aug; 40(4):509-16. PubMed ID: 25583929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Techniques for Interface Stress Measurements within Prosthetic Sockets of Transtibial Amputees: A Review of the Past 50 Years of Research. Al-Fakih EA; Abu Osman NA; Mahmad Adikan FR Sensors (Basel); 2016 Jul; 16(7):. PubMed ID: 27447646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic review of effects of current transtibial prosthetic socket designs-Part 1: Qualitative outcomes. Safari MR; Meier MR J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(5):491-508. PubMed ID: 26436666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of activity intensity, time, and intermittent doffing on daily limb fluid volume change in people with transtibial amputation. Youngblood RT; Hafner BJ; Allyn KJ; Cagle JC; Hinrichs P; Redd C; Vamos AC; Ciol MA; Bean N; Sanders JE Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Feb; 43(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 30010494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss. Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Socket considerations for the patient with a transtibial amputation. Fergason J; Smith DG Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1999 Apr; (361):76-84. PubMed ID: 10212599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Structural testing of lower-limb prosthetic sockets: A systematic review. Gariboldi F; Pasquarelli D; Cutti AG Med Eng Phys; 2022 Jan; 99():103742. PubMed ID: 35058025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Videofluoroscopic evaluation of prosthetic fit and residual limbs following transtibial amputation. Bocobo CR; Castellote JM; MacKinnon D; Gabrielle-Bergman A J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 9505248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]