120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37300406)
41. Nerve conduction studies through landmark based recording and effects of hand length.
Yaranagula SD; Koduri VKC; Babu PS; Veligonda T
Sci Rep; 2023 Jun; 13(1):9962. PubMed ID: 37340030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Reproducibility of sensory nerve conduction studies of the sural nerve using ultrasound-guided needle positioning.
Scheidegger O; Küffer AF; Kamm CP; Rösler KM
Muscle Nerve; 2011 Dec; 44(6):873-6. PubMed ID: 22102456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Peripheral nervous system involvement in systemic sclerosis: the median nerve as target structure.
Lori S; Matucci-Cerinic M; Casale R; Generini S; Lombardi A; Pignone A; Scaletti C; Gangemi PF; Cagnoni M
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 1996; 14(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 8978953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Which nerve conduction parameters can predict spontaneous electromyographic activity in carpal tunnel syndrome?
Chang CW; Lee WJ; Liao YC; Chang MH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Nov; 124(11):2264-8. PubMed ID: 23763989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison of Interpolation Methods in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.
Alcan V; Zinnuroğlu M; Kaymak Karataş G; Bodofsky E
Balkan Med J; 2018 Sep; 35(5):378-383. PubMed ID: 29855424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Effects of interelectrode separation in sensory nerve conduction studies].
Hasegawa O; Iino M; Matsumoto S; Yoshii T; Shimamura M
No To Shinkei; 1999 Aug; 51(8):699-702. PubMed ID: 10478354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Near-nerve versus surface electrode recordings of sensory nerve conduction in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome.
Smith T
Acta Neurol Scand; 1998 Oct; 98(4):280-2. PubMed ID: 9808279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sensitivities of sensory nerve conduction study parameters in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Prakash KM; Fook-Chong S; Leoh TH; Dan YF; Nurjannah S; Tan YE; Lo YL
J Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 23(6):565-7. PubMed ID: 17143144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Utility of ultrasound-guided near-nerve needle recording for lateral femoral cutaneous sensory nerve conduction study: does it increase reliability compared with surface recording?
Deimel GW; Hurst RW; Sorenson EJ; Boon AJ
Muscle Nerve; 2013 Feb; 47(2):274-6. PubMed ID: 23280363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Reappraisal of Supraorbital Sensory Nerve Conduction Recordings: Orthodromic and Antidromic Techniques.
Park HJ; Kim SH; Lee SK; Lee HJ; Kwon HK
Ann Rehabil Med; 2016 Feb; 40(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 26949668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Deep peroneal sensory nerve. Standardization in nerve conduction study.
Lee HJ; Bach JR; DeLisa JA
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1990 Aug; 69(4):202-4. PubMed ID: 2383381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Nomogram for determining the lower normal limits for radial sensory nerve action potentials.
Panagiotis K; Alexandra A; Nikos K
Muscle Nerve; 2016 Jan; 53(1):136-9. PubMed ID: 26394795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [Motor and staged sensory conduction velocities of the ulnar nerve in normal subjects].
Joly H; Laureau E; Duron B
Neurophysiol Clin; 1993 Oct; 23(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 8413120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. NC-stat sensory nerve conduction studies in the median and ulnar nerves of symptomatic patients.
Kong X; Gozani SN; Hayes MT; Weinberg DH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Feb; 117(2):405-13. PubMed ID: 16403673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Temporal evolution of nerve conduction study abnormalities in anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein neuropathy.
Bourque PR; Masson-Roy J; Warman-Chardon J; Massie R; Melanson M; Brooks J; Breiner A
Muscle Nerve; 2021 Mar; 63(3):401-404. PubMed ID: 33290607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evoked sensory nerve action potentials: effect of different recording electrodes on distal latencies and amplitudes.
Mondell DL; Kellner WS; Felsenthal G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1986 Jan; 67(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 3942477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Differential aging of median and ulnar sensory nerve parameters.
Werner RA; Franzblau A; D'Arcy HJ; Evanoff BA; Tong HC
Muscle Nerve; 2012 Jan; 45(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 22190308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Influence of the transverse distance between surface recording electrodes and sensory nerves.
Ven A; Van Hees J; Stappaerts K
Acta Neurol Belg; 2008 Dec; 108(4):143-8. PubMed ID: 19239044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. The role of forearm mixed nerve conduction study in the evaluation of proximal conduction slowing in carpal tunnel syndrome.
Chang MH; Lee YC; Hsieh PF
Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Dec; 119(12):2800-3. PubMed ID: 18976952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The consequences of stimulus intensity on sensory nerve action potentials.
Nashed J; Calder K; Trachter R; McLean L
J Neurosci Methods; 2009 Dec; 185(1):108-15. PubMed ID: 19772874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
