111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37300928)
1. Evaluation treatment planning system for oropharyngeal cancer patient using machine learning.
Glayl AG; Salem KH; Noori HM; Abdul-Zahra DS; Shareef Abdalhussien N; Alkhafaji MA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2023 Sep; 199():110785. PubMed ID: 37300928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients.
de Jong BA; Battinelli C; Free J; Wagenaar D; Engwall E; Janssens G; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1305-1317. PubMed ID: 36373893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dosimetric study of uniform scanning proton therapy planning for prostate cancer patients with a metal hip prosthesis, and comparison with volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
Rana S; Cheng C; Zheng Y; Hsi W; Zeidan O; Schreuder N; Vargas C; Larson G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 May; 15(3):4611. PubMed ID: 24892333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. VMAT partial arc technique decreases dose to organs at risk in whole pelvic radiotherapy for prostate cancer when compared to full arc VMAT and IMRT.
Bartlett GK; Njeh CF; Huang KC; DesRosiers C; Guo G
Med Dosim; 2023 Spring; 48(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 36319515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linac-based VMAT radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions: comparison between a conventional multi-isocenter approach and a new dedicated mono-isocenter technique.
Ruggieri R; Naccarato S; Mazzola R; Ricchetti F; Corradini S; Fiorentino A; Alongi F
Radiat Oncol; 2018 Mar; 13(1):38. PubMed ID: 29506539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Automated Robust Planning for IMPT in Oropharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Machine Learning.
van Bruggen IG; Huiskes M; de Vette SPM; Holmström M; Langendijk JA; Both S; Kierkels RGJ; Korevaar EW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1283-1290. PubMed ID: 36535432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison of two arc-based stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for early-stage lung cancer.
Liu H; Ye J; Kim JJ; Deng J; Kaur MS; Chen ZJ
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 25499078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A dosimetric comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and non-coplanar intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasal cavity and paranasal sinus cancer.
Jeong Y; Lee SW; Kwak J; Cho I; Yoon SM; Kim JH; Park JH; Choi EK; Song SY; Kim YS; Kim SS; Joo JH; Ahn SD
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Aug; 9():193. PubMed ID: 25175383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a mixed beam therapy for postmastectomy breast cancer patients: Bolus electron conformal therapy combined with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy.
Zhang R; Heins D; Sanders M; Guo B; Hogstrom K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2912-2924. PubMed ID: 29749075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Volumetric modulated arc therapy: planning and evaluation for prostate cancer cases.
Zhang P; Happersett L; Hunt M; Jackson A; Zelefsky M; Mageras G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1456-62. PubMed ID: 19540062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dosimetric comparison of hybrid volumetric-modulated arc therapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for left-sided early breast cancer.
Lin JF; Yeh DC; Yeh HL; Chang CF; Lin JC
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):262-7. PubMed ID: 26116150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric comparison of two treatment planning systems for spine SBRT.
Lee YK; Munawar I; Mashouf S; Sahgal A; Ruschin M
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31376988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dosimetric comparison of MR-linac-based IMRT and conventional VMAT treatment plans for prostate cancer.
Da Silva Mendes V; Nierer L; Li M; Corradini S; Reiner M; Kamp F; Niyazi M; Kurz C; Landry G; Belka C
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jul; 16(1):133. PubMed ID: 34289868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy.
Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SmartArc-based volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer: a dosimetric comparison with both intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Clemente S; Wu B; Sanguineti G; Fusco V; Ricchetti F; Wong J; McNutt T
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Jul; 80(4):1248-55. PubMed ID: 20947268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methods for Reducing Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Oropharyngeal Cancer: Dose Reduction or Planning Target Volume Elimination.
Samuels SE; Eisbruch A; Vineberg K; Lee J; Lee C; Matuszak MM; Ten Haken RK; Brock KK
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):645-52. PubMed ID: 27681761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Qiu J; Lv B; Fu M; Wang X; Zheng X; Zhuo W
Head Neck; 2017 Dec; 39(12):2519-2527. PubMed ID: 28963789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
