BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37300933)

  • 1. Multivariable stratification of PI-RADS version 2.1 categories for the risk of false-positive target biopsy: Impact on prostate biopsy decisions.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; De Martino M; Caregnato E; Cereser L; Soligo M; Rozze D; Pizzolitto S; Isola M; Zuiani C
    Eur J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 165():110897. PubMed ID: 37300933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different thresholds of PSA density for risk stratification of PI-RADSv2.1 categories on prostate MRI.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; Panebianco V; Maresca S; Cereser L; De Martino M; Pizzolitto S; Pecoraro M; Ficarra V; Zuiani C; Valotto C
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 95(1131):20210886. PubMed ID: 34762506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Head-to-head comparison of biparametric versus multiparametric MRI of the prostate before robot-assisted transperineal fusion prostate biopsy.
    Thaiss WM; Moser S; Hepp T; Kruck S; Rausch S; Scharpf M; Nikolaou K; Stenzl A; Bedke J; Kaufmann S
    World J Urol; 2022 Oct; 40(10):2431-2438. PubMed ID: 35922717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?
    Zhang Y; Zeng N; Zhang F; Huang Y; Tian Y
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 Jan; 25(1):175-186. PubMed ID: 31473884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of prostate cancer detection in MRI PI-RADS 3 lesions - Reality of a tertiary center.
    Araújo D; Gromicho A; Dias J; Bastos S; Maciel RM; Sabença A; Xambre L
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2023 Dec; 95(4):11830. PubMed ID: 38117217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
    Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. 3-T Multiparametric MRI Followed by In-Bore MR-Guided Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer After Prior Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy.
    Hosseiny M; Shakeri S; Felker ER; Lu D; Sayre J; Ahuja P; Raman SS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Sep; 215(3):660-666. PubMed ID: 32755166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and qualitative in-house categorization system in detection of prostate cancer.
    Gaur S; Harmon S; Mehralivand S; Bednarova S; Calio BP; Sugano D; Sidana A; Merino MJ; Pinto PA; Wood BJ; Shih JH; Choyke PL; Turkbey B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 48(5):1326-1335. PubMed ID: 29603833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prostate cancer detection rate in men undergoing transperineal template-guided saturation and targeted prostate biopsy.
    Kaufmann B; Saba K; Schmidli TS; Stutz S; Bissig L; Britschgi AJ; Schaeren E; Gu A; Langenegger N; Sulser T; Eberli D; Keller EX; Hermanns T; Poyet C
    Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):388-396. PubMed ID: 34914121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison.
    Tosun M; Uslu H
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Oct; 78():98-103. PubMed ID: 33773450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Added Value of Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Selecting Prostate Biopsy Candidates Among Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen and PI-RADS ≥3 Lesions on Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: A Systematic Assessment by PI-RADS Score.
    Pellegrino F; Stabile A; Sorce G; Quarta L; Robesti D; Cannoletta D; Cirulli G; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Mazzone E; de Angelis M; Brembilla G; De Cobelli F; Salonia A; Montorsi F; Briganti A; Gandaglia G
    Eur Urol Focus; 2023 Oct; ():. PubMed ID: 37865591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of prostate-specific antigen density and negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in excluding prostate cancer for biopsy-naïve men: clinical outcomes from a high-volume center in China.
    Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Nie L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Jin K; Li JK; Xiong XY; Yang L; Wei Q
    Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(6):615-619. PubMed ID: 35532555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding Unnecessary Biopsy after Multiparametric Prostate MRI with VERDICT Analysis: The INNOVATE Study.
    Singh S; Rogers H; Kanber B; Clemente J; Pye H; Johnston EW; Parry T; Grey A; Dinneen E; Shaw G; Heavey S; Stopka-Farooqui U; Haider A; Freeman A; Giganti F; Atkinson D; Moore CM; Whitaker HC; Alexander DC; Panagiotaki E; Punwani S
    Radiology; 2022 Dec; 305(3):623-630. PubMed ID: 35916679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
    Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
    Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
    Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI.
    Han C; Liu S; Qin XB; Ma S; Zhu LN; Wang XY
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Apr; 101(4):235-244. PubMed ID: 32063483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combining clinical parameters and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to stratify biopsy-naïve men for an optimum diagnostic strategy with prostate-specific antigen 4 ng ml
    Zhang CC; Tu X; Lin TH; Cai DM; Yang L; Qiu S; Liu ZH; Yang L; Wei Q
    Asian J Androl; 2023; 25(4):492-498. PubMed ID: 36571328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.
    Arcot R; Sekar S; Kotamarti S; Krischak M; Michael ZD; Foo WC; Huang J; Polascik TJ; Gupta RT
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2917-2927. PubMed ID: 35674785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How to optimize follow-up in patients with a suspicious multiparametric MRI and a subsequent negative targeted prostate biopsy. Results from a large, single-institution series.
    Barletta F; Stabile A; Mazzone E; Brembilla G; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Scuderi S; Cannoletta D; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Urol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 40(3):103.e17-103.e24. PubMed ID: 34688534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.