162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37300982)
1. Efficacy of pharmacological and mechanical cervical priming methods for induction of labour and their applicability for outpatient management: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
Khan H; Buaki-Sogo MA; Barlow P; Vardanyan R; Zatorska A; Miller G; Arjomandi Rad A; Malawana J; Shah NM
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Aug; 287():80-92. PubMed ID: 37300982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: a randomised study.
Chowdhary A; Bagga R; Jasvinder Kalra ; Jain V; Saha SC; Kumar P
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):461-467. PubMed ID: 30747025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.
Henry A; Madan A; Reid R; Tracy SK; Austin K; Welsh A; Challis D
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():25. PubMed ID: 23356673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhao G; Song G; Liu J
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Sep; 22(1):688. PubMed ID: 36068489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Oxytocin versus prostaglandins for labour Induction of women with an unfavourable cervix after 24 hours of cervical ripening (OPIC): protocol for an open multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
De Berti M; Le Gouge A; Monmousseau F; Gallot D; Sentilhes L; Winer N; Legendre G; Desbriere R; Girault A; Pozzi J; Gachon B; Barjat T; Perrotin F; Brunet-Houdard S; Diguisto C;
BMJ Open; 2023 Apr; 13(4):e058282. PubMed ID: 37068892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nitric oxide donors for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Ghosh A; Lattey KR; Kelly AJ
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Dec; 12(12):CD006901. PubMed ID: 27918616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour.
Chen W; Xue J; Peprah MK; Wen SW; Walker M; Gao Y; Tang Y
BJOG; 2016 Feb; 123(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 26538408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Double-balloon catheter versus prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening and labour induction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.
Du YM; Zhu LY; Cui LN; Jin BH; Ou JL
BJOG; 2017 May; 124(6):891-899. PubMed ID: 27533177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods for assessing pre-induction cervical ripening.
Ezebialu IU; Eke AC; Eleje GU; Nwachukwu CE
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Jun; 2015(6):CD010762. PubMed ID: 26068943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outpatient Cervical Ripening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
McDonagh M; Skelly AC; Tilden E; Brodt ED; Dana T; Hart E; Kantner SN; Fu R; Hermesch AC
Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jun; 137(6):1091-1101. PubMed ID: 33752219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing Foley Catheter to Prostaglandins for Cervical Ripening in Multiparous Women.
Manly E; Hiersch L; Moloney A; Berndl A; Mei-Dan E; Zaltz A; Barrett J; Melamed N
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Jul; 42(7):853-860. PubMed ID: 32005633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient management of pre-induction cervical ripening.
Chen V; Sheehan P
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Aug; 35(15):2954-2960. PubMed ID: 32847436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical cervicAl ripeninG for women with PrOlongedPregnancies (MAGPOP): protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a silicone double balloon catheter versus the Propess system for the slow release of dinoprostone for cervical ripening of prolonged pregnancies.
Diguisto C; Le Gouge A; Giraudeau B; Perrotin F
BMJ Open; 2017 Sep; 7(9):e016069. PubMed ID: 28912192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intracervical Foley catheter balloon versus dinoprostone insert for induction cervical ripening: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhu L; Zhang C; Cao F; Liu Q; Gu X; Xu J; Li J
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Nov; 97(48):e13251. PubMed ID: 30508911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Safety of the balloon catheter for cervical ripening in outpatient care: complications during the period from insertion to expulsion of a balloon catheter in the process of labour induction: a systematic review.
Diederen M; Gommers J; Wilkinson C; Turnbull D; Mol B
BJOG; 2018 Aug; 125(9):1086-1095. PubMed ID: 29211328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective Comparison of PGE
Blair R; Harvey MA; Pudwell J; Bougie O
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Sep; 42(9):1103-1110. PubMed ID: 32482470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings.
Vogel JP; Osoti AO; Kelly AJ; Livio S; Norman JE; Alfirevic Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Sep; 9(9):CD007701. PubMed ID: 28901007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey.
Patabendige M; Jayawardane A
BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):155. PubMed ID: 28403891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
