BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37301163)

  • 1. Characteristics of automatic emergency braking responses in passenger vehicles evaluated in the IIHS front crash prevention program.
    Kidd DG; Perez-Rapela D; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Sep; 190():107150. PubMed ID: 37301163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):142-152. PubMed ID: 27898367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Forward collision warning system impact.
    Hubele N; Kennedy K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S78-S83. PubMed ID: 30001148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics of rear-end crashes involving passenger vehicles with automatic emergency braking.
    Cicchino JB; Zuby DS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S112-S118. PubMed ID: 31381436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of front crash prevention systems in reducing large truck real-world crash rates.
    Teoh ER
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(4):284-289. PubMed ID: 33769151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of forward collision warning and automatic emergency braking on rear-end crashes involving pickup trucks.
    Cicchino JB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):293-298. PubMed ID: 36853168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improving the safety relevance of automatic emergency braking testing programs: An examination of common characteristics of police-reported rear-end crashes in the United States.
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S137-S142. PubMed ID: 35767826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing an improved automatic preventive braking system based on safety-critical car-following events from naturalistic driving study data.
    Zhou W; Wang X; Glaser Y; Wu X; Xu X
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Dec; 178():106834. PubMed ID: 36150234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Can the speed limit be used as a surrogate for the striking vehicle's travel speed or delta-V in police-reported rear-end crashes?
    Kidd DG
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(3):178-183. PubMed ID: 35929865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Expected Crash and Injury Reduction from Production Forward Collision and Lane Departure Warning Systems.
    Kusano KD; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S109-14. PubMed ID: 26436219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How can front crash prevention systems address more police-reported crashes in the United States?
    Kidd DG; Teoh ER; Jermakian JS
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Oct; 191():107199. PubMed ID: 37406545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative characterization of AEB pulses across the modern fleet.
    Graci V; Maltenfort M; Schneider M; Griffith M; Seacrist T; Arbogast KB
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S62-S67. PubMed ID: 34477482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the crash mitigation effect of low-speed automated emergency braking systems based on insurance claims data.
    Isaksson-Hellman I; Lindman M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():42-7. PubMed ID: 27586101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects on crash risk of automatic emergency braking systems for pedestrians and bicyclists.
    Kullgren A; Amin K; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(sup1):S111-S115. PubMed ID: 37267014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.
    Teoh ER; Lund AK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Oct; 12(5):500-7. PubMed ID: 21972861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field testing the applicability of motorcycle autonomous emergency braking (MAEB) during pre-crash avoidance maneuver.
    Lucci C; Baldanzini N; Savino G
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(3):246-251. PubMed ID: 33709844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash risk.
    Cicchino JB
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jul; 172():106686. PubMed ID: 35580401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influences of pre-crash braking induced dummy - forward displacements on dummy behaviour during EuroNCAP frontal crashtest.
    Woitsch G; Sinz W
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():268-75. PubMed ID: 24211558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.