These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37301643)
21. Characteristics of Successful Integrated Plastic Surgery Applicants from US Allopathic Medical Schools without a Home Integrated Program. Keane CA; Akhter MF; Sarac BA; Janis JE J Surg Educ; 2022; 79(2):551-557. PubMed ID: 34840121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Charting the Effect of the Universal Offer Date on Plastic Surgery Residency Matches. Harris JM; Janhofer DE; Poveromo LP; Otterburn DM Ann Plast Surg; 2022 May; 88(3 Suppl 3):S229-S234. PubMed ID: 35513325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. An Updated View of the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match. Borsting EA; Chim JH; Thaller SR Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Nov; 75(5):556-9. PubMed ID: 26418789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The Plastic Surgery Match: A Quantitative Analysis of Applicant Impressions From the Interview Visit. Frojo G; Tadisina KK; Pressman Z; Chibnall JT; Lin AY; Kraemer BA Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Dec; 77(6):587-591. PubMed ID: 27740953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Effect of Numeric Versus Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1 Scores in the Integrated Plastic Surgery 2023-2024 Match Cycle: A Single Institution Study. Godbe KN; Sinik LM; Nazir N; Egan K; Mathes D; Butterworth J; Farmer R J Surg Educ; 2024 Nov; 81(11):1667-1674. PubMed ID: 39288510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. General surgery applicants report the impact of virtual interviews on their rank list and match. Quinn KM; Runge LT; Parrado RH; Streck CJ; Abbott AM; Talley CL Global Surg Educ; 2022; 1(1):65. PubMed ID: 38013703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting General Surgery Match Outcomes Using Standardized Ranking Metrics. Mao RD; Williams TP; Price A; Colvill KM; Cummins CB; Radhakrishnan RS J Surg Res; 2023 Mar; 283():817-823. PubMed ID: 36915008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Applying to Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Programs: Trends in the Past 5 Years of the Match. Tadisina KK; Orra S; Bassiri Gharb B; Kwiecien G; Bernard S; Zins JE Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Apr; 137(4):1344-1353. PubMed ID: 26761515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study. Sergesketter AR; Song E; Shammas RL; Tian WM; Eberlin KR; Ko JH; Momoh AO; Snyder-Warwick A; Phillips BT J Surg Educ; 2024 May; 81(5):662-670. PubMed ID: 38553367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Integrated plastic surgery residency applicant survey: characteristics of successful applicants and feedback about the interview process. Rogers CR; Gutowski KA; Rio AM; Larson DL; Edwards M; Hansen JE; Lawrence WT; Stevenson TR; Bentz ML Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 May; 123(5):1607-1617. PubMed ID: 19407635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interview experience, post-interview communication, and gender-based differences in the integrated vascular surgery residency match. Fereydooni A; Ramirez JL; Morrow KL; Sorondo S; Lee JT; Coleman DM; Chandra V J Vasc Surg; 2022 Jan; 75(1):316-322.e2. PubMed ID: 34197947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Independent Plastic Surgery Match (2010-2018): Applicant and Program Trends, Predictors of a Successful Match, and Future Directions. Azoury SC; Kozak GM; Stranix JT; Colen DL; Piwnica-Worms W; Fosnot J; Serletti JM; Kovach SJ J Surg Educ; 2020; 77(1):219-228. PubMed ID: 31405800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rise Above the Competition: How Do Plastic Surgery Residency Applicants with NCAA Experience Fare in the Residency Match? Shaffrey EC; Edalatpour A; Nicksic PJ; Nkana ZH; Michelotti BF; Afifi AM Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2024 May; 48(9):1867-1873. PubMed ID: 37500905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Relationship Between Postinterview Correspondence From Residency Program Applicants and Subsequent Applicant Match Outcomes. Swan EC; Baudendistel TE J Grad Med Educ; 2014 Sep; 6(3):478-83. PubMed ID: 26279772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Virtual Interviews for the Independent Plastic Surgery Match: A Modern Convenience or a Modern Misrepresentation? Bamba R; Bhagat N; Tran PC; Westrick E; Hassanein AH; Wooden WA J Surg Educ; 2021; 78(2):612-621. PubMed ID: 32958417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Entering a Post-COVID-19 Landscape: Analysis of 2024 Match Trends in Plastic Surgery. Di Chiaro B; Kujalowicz C; Siemers PJ; Yang M; Hodkiewicz V; Cho S; King TW Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Sep; 93(3):374-377. PubMed ID: 39158338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The "Independent" Plastic Surgery Match: Analysis of Changes in Recent Years and Applicant Preferences. Hammoudeh ZS; Mostafa G; Saint-Cyr M; Bakri K; Mardini S J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 27886967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Residency Program Reputation Influences the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons Match Results. Krueger CA; Chisari E; Israel H; Cannada LK J Arthroplasty; 2020 Sep; 35(9):2676-2681. PubMed ID: 32444232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Insights from San Francisco match rank lists, part II: are programs doing it wrong? Nagarkar PA; Malafa M; Janis JE Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Oct; 73(4):422-6. PubMed ID: 25222925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Orthopaedic Surgery Residency Application Process: An Analysis of the Applicant Experience. Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Chughtai M; Haeberle HS; Taylor SA; Mont MA J Am Acad Orthop Surg; 2018 Aug; 26(15):537-544. PubMed ID: 29870416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]