These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37304060)

  • 1. Crafting the MPEG metrics for objective and perceptual quality assessment of volumetric videos.
    Marvie JE; Nehmé Y; Graziosi D; Lavoué G
    Qual User Exp; 2023; 8(1):4. PubMed ID: 37304060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Subjective performance evaluation of bitrate allocation strategies for MPEG and JPEG Pleno point cloud compression.
    Lazzarotto D; Testolina M; Ebrahimi T
    EURASIP J Image Video Process; 2024; 2024(1):14. PubMed ID: 38873644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual Quality of 3D Meshes With Diffuse Colors in Virtual Reality: Subjective and Objective Evaluation.
    Nehme Y; Dupont F; Farrugia JP; Le Callet P; Lavoue G
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2021 Mar; 27(3):2202-2219. PubMed ID: 33166254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. CUQI: cardiac ultrasound video quality index.
    Razaak M; Martini MG
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2016 Jan; 3(1):011011. PubMed ID: 27014715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assessment for wireless capsule endoscopy videos compressed via HEVC: From diagnostic quality to visual perception.
    Usman MA; Usman MR; Shin SY
    Comput Biol Med; 2017 Dec; 91():112-134. PubMed ID: 29059590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A convolutional neural network approach for objective video quality assessment.
    Le Callet P; Viard-Gaudin C; Barba D
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2006 Sep; 17(5):1316-27. PubMed ID: 17001990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Locally Weighted Fixation Density-Based Metric for Assessing the Quality of Visual Saliency Predictions.
    Gide MS; Karam LJ
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Aug; 25(8):3852-61. PubMed ID: 27295671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIQSV+: A No-Reference Synthesized View Quality Assessment Metric.
    Tian S; Zhang L; Morin L; Deforges O
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2018 Apr; 27(4):1652-1664. PubMed ID: 29324418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative study of the methodologies used for subjective medical image quality assessment.
    Lévêque L; Outtas M; Liu H; Zhang L
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 66(15):. PubMed ID: 34225264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the Efficiency of Image Metrics for Evaluating the Visual Quality of 3D Models.
    Lavoue G; Larabi MC; Vasa L
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2016 Aug; 22(8):1987-99. PubMed ID: 26394428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective Assessment of Objective Image Quality Metrics Range Guaranteeing Visually Lossless Compression.
    Afnan ; Ullah F; Yaseen ; Lee J; Jamil S; Kwon OJ
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jan; 23(3):. PubMed ID: 36772337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality Assessment of Sharpened Images: Challenges, Methodology, and Objective Metrics.
    Krasula L; Le Callet P; Fliegel K; Klima M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Mar; 26(3):1496-1508. PubMed ID: 28092541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Graph Similarity.
    Yang Q; Ma Z; Xu Y; Li Z; Sun J
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2022 Jun; 44(6):3015-3029. PubMed ID: 33360982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment Based on an Optimal Linear Combination of Quality Measures Selected by Simulated Annealing.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2022 Aug; 8(8):. PubMed ID: 36005467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subjective Quality Assessment of V-PCC-Compressed Dynamic Point Clouds Degraded by Packet Losses.
    Dumic E; da Silva Cruz LA
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 Jun; 23(12):. PubMed ID: 37420788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A study on quality assessment for medical ultrasound video compressed via HEVC.
    Razaak M; Martini MG; Savino K
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2014 Sep; 18(5):1552-9. PubMed ID: 24893370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the suitability of VMAF for quality assessment of medical videos: Medical ultrasound & wireless capsule endoscopy.
    Usman MA; Martini MG
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Oct; 113():103383. PubMed ID: 31437625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduced Reference Perceptual Quality Model With Application to Rate Control for Video-Based Point Cloud Compression.
    Liu Q; Yuan H; Hamzaoui R; Su H; Hou J; Yang H
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():6623-6636. PubMed ID: 34280099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image Quality Evaluation in Professional HDR/WCG Production Questions the Need for HDR Metrics.
    Sugito Y; Vazquez-Corral J; Canham T; Bertalmio M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():5163-5177. PubMed ID: 35853056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An Optimization-Based Family of Predictive, Fusion-Based Models for Full-Reference Image Quality Assessment.
    Varga D
    J Imaging; 2023 Jun; 9(6):. PubMed ID: 37367464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.