These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37304060)
21. Quality Assessment of DIBR-Synthesized Views Based on Sparsity of Difference of Closings and Difference of Gaussians. Sandic-Stankovic DD; Kukolj DD; Le Callet P IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1161-1175. PubMed ID: 34990360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Study of the Subjective and Objective Quality of High Motion Live Streaming Videos. Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1027-1041. PubMed ID: 34951848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluating Quantitative Metrics of Tone-Mapped Images. Khan IR; Alotaibi TA; Siddiq A; Bourennani F IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():1751-1760. PubMed ID: 35104219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. State-of-the-art image and video quality assessment with a metric based on an intrinsically non-linear neural summation model. Luna R; Zabaleta I; Bertalmío M Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1222815. PubMed ID: 37559700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of HDR Videos. Shang Z; Ebenezer JP; Venkataramanan AK; Wu Y; Wei H; Sethuraman S; Bovik AC IEEE Trans Image Process; 2024; 33():42-57. PubMed ID: 37988212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Spatiotemporal Statistics for Video Quality Assessment. Xuelong Li ; Qun Guo ; Xiaoqiang Lu IEEE Trans Image Process; 2016 Jul; 25(7):3329-3342. PubMed ID: 27187966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Quality Assessment of Free-Viewpoint Videos by Quantifying the Elastic Changes of Multi-Scale Motion Trajectories. Ling S; Li J; Che Z; Min X; Zhai G; Le Callet P IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():517-531. PubMed ID: 33201815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fast Blind Quality Assessment of DIBR-Synthesized Video Based on High-High Wavelet Subband. Sandic-Stankovic DD; Kukolj DD; Le Callet P IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Nov; 28(11):5524-5536. PubMed ID: 31180890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Additive log-logistic model for networked video quality assessment. Zhang F; Lin W; Chen Z; Ngan KN IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Apr; 22(4):1536-47. PubMed ID: 23247855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development and evaluation of aperture-based complexity metrics using film and EPID measurements of static MLC openings. Götstedt J; Karlsson Hauer A; Bäck A Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3911-21. PubMed ID: 26133592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Mobile Cloud Gaming Videos. Saha A; Chen YC; Davis C; Qiu B; Wang X; Gowda R; Katsavounidis I; Bovik AC IEEE Trans Image Process; 2023; 32():3295-3310. PubMed ID: 37276105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Perceptual Video Quality Prediction Emphasizing Chroma Distortions. Chen LH; Bampis CG; Li Z; Sole J; Bovik AC IEEE Trans Image Process; 2021; 30():1408-1422. PubMed ID: 33332266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of Six Phase Encoding Based Susceptibility Distortion Correction Methods for Diffusion MRI. Gu X; Eklund A Front Neuroinform; 2019; 13():76. PubMed ID: 31866847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Entropy-Based Combined Metric for Automatic Objective Quality Assessment of Stitched Panoramic Images. Okarma K; Chlewicki W; Kopytek M; Marciniak B; Lukin V Entropy (Basel); 2021 Nov; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 34828223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predicting subjective judgment of best focus with objective image quality metrics. Cheng X; Bradley A; Thibos LN J Vis; 2004 Apr; 4(4):310-21. PubMed ID: 15134478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Objective Video Quality Assessment Combining Transfer Learning With CNN. Zhang Y; Gao X; He L; Lu W; He R IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2020 Aug; 31(8):2716-2730. PubMed ID: 30736007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of motion artifact metrics for coronary CT angiography. Ma H; Gros E; Szabo A; Baginski SG; Laste ZR; Kulkarni NM; Okerlund D; Schmidt TG Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):687-702. PubMed ID: 29222954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Confusing Image Quality Assessment: Toward Better Augmented Reality Experience. Duan H; Min X; Zhu Y; Zhai G; Yang X; Le Callet P IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():7206-7221. PubMed ID: 36367913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Single Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: A Real-World Dataset, Subjective Studies, and an Objective Metric. Jiang Q; Liu Z; Gu K; Shao F; Zhang X; Liu H; Lin W IEEE Trans Image Process; 2022; 31():2279-2294. PubMed ID: 35239481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]