These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37304421)
1. Marginal fit of endocrowns fabricated by three-dimensional printing and the conventional method: An Jamshidi S; Darabi R; Azarian M; Mahabadi M; Nilli M Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():53. PubMed ID: 37304421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate endocrowns fabricated using conventional, digital, and combination techniques. Abduljawad DE; Rayyan MR J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):707-714. PubMed ID: 35294099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Marginal Fit of Temporary Restorations Fabricated by the Conventional Chairside Method, 3D Printing, and Milling. Mohajeri M; Khazaei S; Vafaee F; Firouz F; Ghorbani Gholiabad S; Shisheian A Front Dent; 2021; 18():31. PubMed ID: 35965729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of marginal and internal fit of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyetheretherketone computer-aided design - computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) materials: An Godil AZ; Kazi AI; Wadwan SA; Gandhi KY; Dugal RJS J Conserv Dent; 2021; 24(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 34759588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments. Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal gap of monolithic zirconia endocrowns fabricated by using digital scanning and conventional impressions. Falahchai M; Babaee Hemmati Y; Neshandar Asli H; Emadi I J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):325.e1-325.e5. PubMed ID: 33190865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative evaluation of internal fit and marginal gap of endocrowns using lithium disilicate and polyether ether ketone materials - an in vitro study. Nagi N; Fouda AM; Bourauel C BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):207. PubMed ID: 37029396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Study of the Marginal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Ceramic Materials: An In Vitro Study. Attar E; Alshali S; Abuhaimed T Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e40081. PubMed ID: 37292110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate inlays fabricated with milling, 3D printing, and conventional technologies. Homsy FR; Özcan M; Khoury M; Majzoub ZAK J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):783-790. PubMed ID: 28969918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Lithium Disilicate Endocrowns Fabricated By Heat-Pressable and Subtractive Techniques. El Ghoul W; Salameh Z J Prosthodont; 2021 Jul; 30(6):509-514. PubMed ID: 33038279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the internal fit of metal crowns fabricated by traditional casting, computer numerical control milling, and three-dimensional printing. Chou WT; Chuang CC; Wang YB; Chiu HC PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257158. PubMed ID: 34529710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal and Internal Gap of Handmade, Milled and 3D Printed Additive Manufactured Patterns for Pressed Lithium Disilicate Onlay Restorations. Revilla-León M; Olea-Vielba M; Esteso-Saiz A; Martínez-Klemm I; Özcan M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Mar; 26(1):31-38. PubMed ID: 29461746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marginal and internal fit of provisional crowns fabricated using 3D printing technology. Chaturvedi S; Alqahtani NM; Addas MK; Alfarsi MA Technol Health Care; 2020; 28(6):635-642. PubMed ID: 32280071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks. Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials. Zimmermann M; Valcanaia A; Neiva G; Mehl A; Fasbinder D J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Micro-computed Tomography Analysis of Marginal and Internal Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Three CAD/CAM Materials. Hassouneh L; Jum'ah A; Ferrari M; Wood DJ Oper Dent; 2023 Jan; 48(1):79-89. PubMed ID: 36445975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Effect of Cement Space Parameters on the Marginal Adaptation of Milled Endocrowns: An In Vitro Study. Suliman O; Rayyan MR Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38688. PubMed ID: 37292555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An Sarda AS; Bedia SV Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate veneers fabricated via a manual waxing technique versus a 3D printed technique. Guachetá L; Stevens CD; Tamayo Cardona JA; Murgueitio R J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):715-720. PubMed ID: 33174306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods. Ng J; Ruse D; Wyatt C J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]