These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37305625)

  • 1. A global, propensity-score matched analysis of patients receiving artificial urinary sphincters and the risk of complications, infections, and re-interventions.
    Prebay ZJ; Ebbott D; Foss H; Li M; Chung PH
    Transl Androl Urol; 2023 May; 12(5):832-839. PubMed ID: 37305625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors Increase the Risk of Urologic Implant Reintervention?
    Prebay ZJ; Foss H; Ebbott D; Hyman J; Li M; Chung PH
    Urology; 2023 Apr; 174():191-195. PubMed ID: 36754235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Artificial urinary sphincter significantly better than fixed sling for moderate post-prostatectomy stress urinary incontinence: a propensity score-matched study.
    Sacco E; Gandi C; Marino F; Totaro A; Di Gianfrancesco L; Palermo G; Pierconti F; Racioppi M; Bassi P
    BJU Int; 2021 Feb; 127(2):229-237. PubMed ID: 32744793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter implantation with distal bulbar double cuff in men with and without a history of external beam radiotherapy: an analysis of a prospective database.
    Maurer V; Marks P; Dahlem R; Rosenbaum CM; Meyer CP; Riechardt S; Fisch M; Ludwig T
    BJU Int; 2019 Dec; 124(6):1040-1046. PubMed ID: 31351030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of previous urethroplasty on the outcome after artificial urinary sphincter implantation: a prospective evaluation.
    Sayedahmed K; Olianas R; Kaftan B; Omar M; El Shazly M; Burger M; Mayr R; Rosenhammer B
    World J Urol; 2020 Jan; 38(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 30980093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial urinary sphincter longevity following transurethral resection of the prostate in the setting of prostate cancer.
    Cohen AJ; Boysen W; Kuchta K; Faris S; Milose J
    World J Urol; 2019 Dec; 37(12):2755-2761. PubMed ID: 30826886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of complication rates related to male urethral slings and artificial urinary sphincters for urinary incontinence: national multi-institutional analysis of ACS-NSQIP database.
    Alwaal A; Harris CR; Awad MA; Allen IE; Breyer BN
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2016 Oct; 48(10):1571-6. PubMed ID: 27417131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined Placement of Artificial Urinary Sphincter and Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Does Not Increase Risk of Perioperative Complications or Impact Long-term Device Survival.
    Boysen WR; Cohen AJ; Kuchta K; Park S; Milose J
    Urology; 2019 Feb; 124():264-270. PubMed ID: 30786981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of Urethroplasty to Treat Urethral Strictures Arising From Artificial Urinary Sphincter Erosions and Rates of Subsequent Device Replacement.
    Keihani S; Chandrapal JC; Peterson AC; Broghammer JA; Chertack N; Elliott SP; Rourke KF; Alsikafi NF; Buckley JC; Breyer BN; Smith TG; Voelzke BB; Zhao LC; Brant WO; Myers JB;
    Urology; 2017 Sep; 107():239-245. PubMed ID: 28624554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continence and Complication Rates of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Devices (AMS 800) for Parkinson and Stroke Patients with Incontinence after Prostate Surgery: Retrospective Analysis of a Prospective Database.
    Maurer V; Stahlberg J; Schiffmann I; Marks P; Rosenbaum CM; Soave A; Vetterlein MW; Meyer CP; Riechardt S; Fisch M; Ludwig TA; Dahlem R
    Urol Int; 2021; 105(3-4):225-231. PubMed ID: 33440398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Failure and Strategies for Surgical Revision: Implications of Device Component Survival.
    Srivastava A; Joice GA; Patel HD; Manka MG; Sopko NA; Wright EJ
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Sep; 5(5):887-893. PubMed ID: 29545058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short term reoperation rates after artificial urinary sphincter placement in pediatric patients.
    Loftus CJ; Ahn J; Nguyen AM; Holt S; Cain M; Shnorhavorian M; Merguerian P; Hagedorn JC
    Can J Urol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):11318-11322. PubMed ID: 36245203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of a Series of Patients with Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence Treated with an Adjustable Transobturator Male System or Artificial Urinary Sphincter.
    Esquinas C; Ruiz S; de Sancha E; Vazquez M; Dorado JF; Virseda M; Arance I; Angulo JC
    Adv Ther; 2021 Jan; 38(1):678-690. PubMed ID: 33230712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between Previous Pelvic Radiation and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Failure of Replacement Artificial Urinary Sphincters.
    Huang MM; Huffman P; Dani H; Knijnik PG; da Silva AF; Burnett AL; Mostwin JL; Wright EJ; Cohen AJ
    J Urol; 2022 Jun; 207(6):1268-1275. PubMed ID: 35050698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective analysis of artificial urinary sphincter AMS 800 implantation after buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.
    Maurer V; Marks P; Dahlem R; Rosenbaum C; Meyer CP; Riechardt S; Fisch M; Ludwig T
    World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):647-653. PubMed ID: 30656494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Erosion rates of 3.5-cm artificial urinary sphincter cuffs are similar to larger cuffs.
    McKibben MJ; Shakir N; Fuchs JS; Scott JM; Morey AF
    BJU Int; 2019 Feb; 123(2):335-341. PubMed ID: 30007096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contemporary Review of Artificial Urinary Sphincters for Male Stress Urinary Incontinence.
    Yafi FA; Powers MK; Zurawin J; Hellstrom WJ
    Sex Med Rev; 2016 Apr; 4(2):157-166. PubMed ID: 27872025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Early Revision after Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation Does Not Impair the Long-Term Treatment Success.
    Sayedahmed K; Rosenhammer B; Burger M; Goßler C
    Urol Int; 2022; 106(3):261-268. PubMed ID: 34289484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patterns and timing of artificial urinary sphincter failure.
    Cohen AJ; Kuchta K; Park S; Milose J
    World J Urol; 2018 Jun; 36(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 29383481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk Factors for Failure of Male Slings and Artificial Urinary Sphincters: Results from a Large Middle European Cohort Study.
    Hüsch T; Kretschmer A; Thomsen F; Kronlachner D; Kurosch M; Obaje A; Anding R; Pottek T; Rose A; Olianas R; Friedl A; Hübner W; Homberg R; Pfitzenmaier J; Grein U; Queissert F; Naumann CM; Schweiger J; Wotzka C; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hofmann T; Ulm K; Bauer RM; Haferkamp A;
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 27598774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.