These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37305993)

  • 1. ChatGPT, artificial intelligence and scientific writing: What authors, peer reviewers and editors should know.
    Misra DP; Chandwar K
    J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2023 Jun; 53(2):90-93. PubMed ID: 37305993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2.
    Verharen JPH
    Elife; 2023 Nov; 12():. PubMed ID: 37922198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the potential of ChatGPT in the peer review process: An observational study.
    Saad A; Jenko N; Ariyaratne S; Birch N; Iyengar KP; Davies AM; Vaishya R; Botchu R
    Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2024 Feb; 18(2):102946. PubMed ID: 38330745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Elevating scientific writing with ChatGPT: A guide for reviewers, editors… and authors.
    Rozencwajg S; Kantor E
    Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med; 2023 Jun; 42(3):101209. PubMed ID: 36871626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Artificial Intelligence is Irreversibly Bound to Academic Publishing - ChatGPT is Cleared for Scientific Writing and Peer Review.
    Gomes WJ; Evora PRB; Guizilini S
    Braz J Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct; 38(4):e20230963. PubMed ID: 37797272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial intelligence in scientific writing: a friend or a foe?
    Altmäe S; Sola-Leyva A; Salumets A
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2023 Jul; 47(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 37142479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rising adoption of artificial intelligence in scientific publishing: evaluating the role, risks, and ethical implications in paper drafting and review process.
    Carobene A; Padoan A; Cabitza F; Banfi G; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2024 Apr; 62(5):835-843. PubMed ID: 38019961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence, Including Large Language Models Such as ChatGPT, in Scientific Publications: Policies of
    Park SH
    Korean J Radiol; 2023 Aug; 24(8):715-718. PubMed ID: 37500572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ChatGPT and Corporations of Mega-journals Jeopardize the Norms That Underpin Academic Publishing.
    Rahimi F; Talebi Bezmin Abadi A
    Arch Iran Med; 2024 Feb; 27(2):110-112. PubMed ID: 38619035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Generative artificial intelligence: Can ChatGPT write a quality abstract?
    Babl FE; Babl MP
    Emerg Med Australas; 2023 Oct; 35(5):809-811. PubMed ID: 37142327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A review of top cardiology and cardiovascular medicine journal guidelines regarding the use of generative artificial intelligence tools in scientific writing.
    Inam M; Sheikh S; Minhas AMK; Vaughan EM; Krittanawong C; Samad Z; Lavie CJ; Khoja A; D'Cruze M; Slipczuk L; Alarakhiya F; Naseem A; Haider AH; Virani SS
    Curr Probl Cardiol; 2024 Mar; 49(3):102387. PubMed ID: 38185435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Writing Scientific Review Articles.
    Kacena MA; Plotkin LI; Fehrenbacher JC
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2024 Feb; 22(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 38227177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of using ChatGPT AI in writing medical scientific articles.
    Benichou L;
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Oct; 124(5):101456. PubMed ID: 36966950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of transparency: Declaring the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in academic writing.
    Tang A; Li KK; Kwok KO; Cao L; Luong S; Tam W
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2024 Mar; 56(2):314-318. PubMed ID: 37904646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. AI Is Changing the Landscape of Academic Writing: What Can Be Done? Authors' Reply to: AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened".
    Májovský M; Mikolov T; Netuka D
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e50844. PubMed ID: 37651175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. What authors need to know about the way editors think: report from the congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
    Neale AV
    Fam Med; 2002 Feb; 34(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 11874024
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Chatbots, generative AI, and scholarly manuscripts: WAME recommendations on chatbots and generative artificial intelligence in relation to scholarly publications.
    Zielinski C; Winker MA; Aggarwal R; Ferris LE; Heinemann M; Lapeña JF; Pai SA; Ing E; Citrome L; Alam M; Voight M; Habibzadeh F
    Colomb Med (Cali); 2023; 54(3):e1015868. PubMed ID: 38089825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blind peer review: tips for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Flanagin A
    Nurse Author Ed; 1994; 4(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 7849791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Skidmore B; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Hébert PC; Palepu A
    Syst Rev; 2013 Jun; 2():41. PubMed ID: 23773340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing.
    Semrl N; Feigl S; Taumberger N; Bracic T; Fluhr H; Blockeel C; Kollmann M
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2281-2288. PubMed ID: 37833847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.