These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37305993)

  • 21. The Readiness of ChatGPT to Write Scientific Case Reports Independently: A Comparative Evaluation Between Human and Artificial Intelligence.
    Buholayka M; Zouabi R; Tadinada A
    Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e39386. PubMed ID: 37378091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Association of reviewer experience with discriminating human-written versus ChatGPT-written abstracts.
    Levin G; Pareja R; Viveros-Carreño D; Sanchez Diaz E; Yates EM; Zand B; Ramirez PT
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2024 May; 34(5):669-674. PubMed ID: 38627032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers.
    Rahimi F; Talebi Bezmin Abadi A
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2023 Nov; 51(11):2340-2350. PubMed ID: 37284995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?
    Garcia MB
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2024 Feb; 52(2):139-140. PubMed ID: 37368125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. AI Increases the Pressure to Overhaul the Scientific Peer Review Process. Comment on "Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened".
    Liu N; Brown A
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Aug; 25():e50591. PubMed ID: 37651167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.
    Guleria A; Krishan K; Sharma V; Kanchan T
    J Infect Dev Ctries; 2023 Sep; 17(9):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 37824352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Artificial intelligence in peer review: How can evolutionary computation support journal editors?
    Mrowinski MJ; Fronczak P; Fronczak A; Ausloos M; Nedic O
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184711. PubMed ID: 28931033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.
    Gasparyan AY; Ayvazyan L; Blackmore H; Kitas GD
    Rheumatol Int; 2011 Nov; 31(11):1409-17. PubMed ID: 21800117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [How to write and publish a scientific article in stomatology].
    Gao XJ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 52(12):758-761. PubMed ID: 29275572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of ChatGPT in medical research and scientific writing.
    Lee PY; Salim H; Abdullah A; Teo CH
    Malays Fam Physician; 2023; 18():58. PubMed ID: 37814667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) Analysis of ChatGPT in the Medical Literature: Concise Review.
    Gödde D; Nöhl S; Wolf C; Rupert Y; Rimkus L; Ehlers J; Breuckmann F; Sellmann T
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Nov; 25():e49368. PubMed ID: 37865883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.
    Joseph WS
    Clin Podiatr Med Surg; 2024 Apr; 41(2):359-366. PubMed ID: 38388132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. New Challenges in Scientific Publications: Referencing, Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT.
    Švab I; Klemenc-Ketiš Z; Zupanič S
    Zdr Varst; 2023 Sep; 62(3):109-112. PubMed ID: 37327133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Peer review? No thanks!
    Castelo-Branco C
    Climacteric; 2023 Feb; 26(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 36420749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology.
    Galipeau J; Moher D; Campbell C; Hendry P; Cameron DW; Palepu A; Hébert PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Mar; 68(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 25510373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of artificial intelligence to improve the scientific writing of non-native english speakers.
    Giglio AD; Costa MUPD
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(9):e20230560. PubMed ID: 37729376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: A Guide for Authors and Reviewers.
    England JR; Cheng PM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Mar; 212(3):513-519. PubMed ID: 30557049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. ChatGPT: Transcending Language Limitations in Scientific Research Using Artificial Intelligence.
    Osama M; Afridi S; Maaz M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2023 Oct; 33(10):1198-1200. PubMed ID: 37804030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use.
    Nature; 2023 Jan; 613(7945):612. PubMed ID: 36694020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Revising a manuscript: ten principles to guide success for publication.
    Provenzale JM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Dec; 195(6):W382-7. PubMed ID: 21098168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.