These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37306012)

  • 1. The positive association of education with the trust in science and scientists is weaker in highly corrupt countries.
    Alper S; Yelbuz BE; Akkurt SB; Yilmaz O
    Public Underst Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):2-19. PubMed ID: 37306012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism.
    Howell EL; Wirz CD; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Xenos MA
    Public Underst Sci; 2020 Nov; 29(8):800-818. PubMed ID: 33153407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Problem of Trust Without Intimacy: Education for Handling Expert Knowledge in a Neoliberal Marketplace.
    Smith DV
    Sci Educ (Dordr); 2022; 31(6):1449-1474. PubMed ID: 35250177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trust in science, social consensus and vaccine confidence.
    Sturgis P; Brunton-Smith I; Jackson J
    Nat Hum Behav; 2021 Nov; 5(11):1528-1534. PubMed ID: 34002053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A science confidence gap: Education, trust in scientific methods, and trust in scientific institutions in the United States, 2014.
    Achterberg P; de Koster W; van der Waal J
    Public Underst Sci; 2017 Aug; 26(6):704-720. PubMed ID: 26644011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientists' and science writers' experiences reporting genetic discoveries: toward an ethic of trust in science journalism.
    Geller G; Bernhardt BA; Gardner M; Rodgers J; Holtzman NA
    Genet Med; 2005 Mar; 7(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 15775756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of conflict of interest on trust in science.
    Friedman PJ
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2002 Jul; 8(3):413-20. PubMed ID: 12353371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trusted online sources of health information: differences in demographics, health beliefs, and health-information orientation.
    Dutta-Bergman M
    J Med Internet Res; 2003; 5(3):e21. PubMed ID: 14517112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trust in science and scientists among university students, staff, and faculty of a large, diverse university in Los Angeles during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Trojan Pandemic Response Initiative.
    Nicolo M; Kawaguchi E; Ghanem-Uzqueda A; Soto D; Deva S; Shanker K; Lee R; Gilliland F; Klausner JD; Baezconde-Garbanati L; Kovacs A; Van Orman S; Hu H; Unger JB
    BMC Public Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):601. PubMed ID: 36997945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Opposing ends of the spectrum: Exploring trust in scientific and religious authorities.
    Cacciatore MA; Browning N; Scheufele DA; Brossard D; Xenos MA; Corley EA
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):11-28. PubMed ID: 27458117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing changes in US public trust in science amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
    Agley J
    Public Health; 2020 Jun; 183():122-125. PubMed ID: 32405095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How social evaluations shape trust in 45 types of scientists.
    Gligorić V; van Kleef GA; Rutjens BT
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(4):e0299621. PubMed ID: 38635582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. "Who Doesn't?"--The Impact of Descriptive Norms on Corruption.
    Köbis NC; van Prooijen JW; Righetti F; Van Lange PA
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131830. PubMed ID: 26121127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Einstein effect provides global evidence for scientific source credibility effects and the influence of religiosity.
    Hoogeveen S; Haaf JM; Bulbulia JA; Ross RM; McKay R; Altay S; Bendixen T; Berniūnas R; Cheshin A; Gentili C; Georgescu R; Gervais WM; Hagel K; Kavanagh C; Levy N; Neely A; Qiu L; Rabelo A; Ramsay JE; Rutjens BT; Turpin H; Uzarevic F; Wuyts R; Xygalatas D; van Elk M
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 6(4):523-535. PubMed ID: 35132171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Polarization of public trust in scientists between 1978 and 2018
    Li N; Qian Y
    Politics Life Sci; 2023 Mar; 41(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 36877108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientists and religious leaders compete for cultural authority of science.
    Scheitle CP; Johnson DR; Ecklund EH
    Public Underst Sci; 2018 Jan; 27(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 28699837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using Normative Language When Describing Scientific Findings: Randomized Controlled Trial of Effects on Trust and Credibility.
    Agley J; Xiao Y; Thompson EE; Golzarri-Arroyo L
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Mar; 25():e45482. PubMed ID: 36995753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New trends in science communication fostering evidence-informed policymaking.
    Szüdi G; Bartar P; Weiss G; Pellegrini G; Tulin M; Oomen T
    Open Res Eur; 2022; 2():78. PubMed ID: 37920848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming.
    Hmielowski JD; Feldman L; Myers TA; Leiserowitz A; Maibach E
    Public Underst Sci; 2014 Oct; 23(7):866-83. PubMed ID: 23825287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.