124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37306750)
1. [Risk-minimizing tube current modulation for computed tomography].
Kachelrieß M
Radiologie (Heidelb); 2023 Jul; 63(7):523-529. PubMed ID: 37306750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient-specific radiation risk-based tube current modulation for diagnostic CT.
Klein L; Liu C; Steidel J; Enzmann L; Knaup M; Sawall S; Maier A; Lell M; Maier J; Kachelrieß M
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4391-4403. PubMed ID: 35421263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of angular and longitudinal tube current modulations on the estimation of organ and effective doses in x-ray computed tomography.
van Straten M; Deak P; Shrimpton PC; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4881-9. PubMed ID: 19994496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation dose reduction to the breast in thoracic CT: comparison of bismuth shielding, organ-based tube current modulation, and use of a globally decreased tube current.
Wang J; Duan X; Christner JA; Leng S; Yu L; McCollough CH
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6084-92. PubMed ID: 22047373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.
Liu H; Gao Y; Ding A; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 25227436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dose reduction in CT examination of children by an attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose).
Greess H; Nömayr A; Wolf H; Baum U; Lell M; Böwing B; Kalender W; Bautz WA
Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1571-6. PubMed ID: 12042970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal dose reduction algorithm using an attenuation-based tube current modulation method for cone-beam CT imaging.
Son K; Chang J; Lee H; Kim C; Lee T; Cho S; Park S; Kim JS
PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192933. PubMed ID: 29447260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.
Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4525-48. PubMed ID: 25069102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. New organ-based tube current modulation method to reduce the radiation dose during computed tomography of the head: evaluation of image quality and radiation dose to the eyes in the phantom study.
Kim JS; Kwon SM; Kim JM; Yoon SW
Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):601-608. PubMed ID: 28341967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.
Angel E; Yaghmai N; Jude CM; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Goldin JG; Primak AN; Stevens DM; Cody DD; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):497-512. PubMed ID: 19124953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Angular on-line tube current modulation in multidetector CT examinations of children and adults: the influence of different scanning parameters on dose reduction.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2864-74. PubMed ID: 17821994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers.
Kalender WA; Wolf H; Suess C; Gies M; Greess H; Bautz WA
Eur Radiol; 1999; 9(2):323-28. PubMed ID: 10101657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of an organ-based tube current modulation tool in pediatric CT examinations.
Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Oct; 30(10):5728-5737. PubMed ID: 32435930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between combined automatic tube current modulation and fixed tube current technique in CT of abdomen and pelvis.
Lee S; Yoon SW; Yoo SM; Ji YG; Kim KA; Kim SH; Lee JT
Acta Radiol; 2011 Dec; 52(10):1101-6. PubMed ID: 21903869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Efficient use of automatic exposure control systems in computed tomography requires correct patient positioning.
Gudjonsdottir J; Svensson JR; Campling S; Brennan PC; Jonsdottir B
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):1035-41. PubMed ID: 19863414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing radiation exposure for CT localizer radiographs.
Bohrer E; Schäfer S; Mäder U; Noël PB; Krombach GA; Fiebich M
Z Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 27(2):145-158. PubMed ID: 27720574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of effective and organ dose estimation in CT when using mA modulation: A single scanner pilot study.
Tootell A; Szczepura K; Hogg P
Radiography (Lond); 2017 May; 23(2):159-166. PubMed ID: 28390549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Iterative reconstruction and automatic tube voltage selection reduce clinical CT radiation doses and image noise.
O'Hora L; Foley SJ
Radiography (Lond); 2018 Feb; 24(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 29306371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective dose and organ doses estimation taking tube current modulation into account with a commercial software package.
Lopez-Rendon X; Bosmans H; Oyen R; Zanca F
Eur Radiol; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1919-25. PubMed ID: 25680725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
