These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37307761)
1. Evaluation of lower limb and pelvic marker placement precision among different evaluators and its impact on gait kinematics computed with the Conventional Gait Model. Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Grouvel G; Bonnefoy-Mazure A; Dumas R; Armand S Gait Posture; 2023 Jul; 104():22-30. PubMed ID: 37307761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can the evaluation of marker placement confidence be used as an indicator of gait kinematic variability? Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Lena C; Grouvel G; Bonnefoy-Mazure A; Dumas R; Armand S Front Rehabil Sci; 2023; 4():1122303. PubMed ID: 37496701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of knee marker misplacement on gait kinematics of children with cerebral palsy using the Conventional Gait Model-A sensitivity study. Fonseca M; Gasparutto X; Leboeuf F; Dumas R; Armand S PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232064. PubMed ID: 32330162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Within-assessor reliability and minimal detectable change of gait kinematics in a young obese demographic. Horsak B; Pobatschnig B; Baca A; Greber-Platzer S; Kreissl A; Nehrer S; Wondrasch B; Crevenna R; Keilani M; Kranzl A Gait Posture; 2017 May; 54():112-118. PubMed ID: 28288331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Conventional Gait Model's sensitivity to lower-limb marker placement. Fonseca M; Bergere M; Candido J; Leboeuf F; Dumas R; Armand S Sci Rep; 2022 Aug; 12(1):14207. PubMed ID: 35987823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Between-day reliability and minimum detectable change of the Conventional Gait Model 2 and Plug-in Gait Model during running. Okahisa T; Matsuura T; Tomonari K; Komatsu K; Yokoyama K; Iwase J; Yamada M; Sairyo K Gait Posture; 2023 Feb; 100():171-178. PubMed ID: 36563589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Amsterdam Foot Model: a clinically informed multi-segment foot model developed to minimize measurement errors in foot kinematics. Schallig W; van den Noort JC; Piening M; Streekstra GJ; Maas M; van der Krogt MM; Harlaar J J Foot Ankle Res; 2022 Jun; 15(1):46. PubMed ID: 35668453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modified conventional gait model versus cluster tracking: Test-retest reliability, agreement and impact of inverse kinematics with joint constraints on kinematic and kinetic data. Mentiplay BF; Clark RA Gait Posture; 2018 Jul; 64():75-83. PubMed ID: 29879631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter-evaluator and Intra-evaluator Reliability of a Software Program Used to Extract Kinematic Variables Obtained by an Extremity-Mounted Inertial Measurement Unit System in Sound Horses at the Trot Under Soft and Hard Ground Conditions and Treadmill Exercise. Schwarz J; Vidondo B; Maninchedda UE; Sprick M; Schöpfer MC; Cruz AM Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():595455. PubMed ID: 33748204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Applications of markerless motion capture in gait recognition. Sandau M Dan Med J; 2016 Mar; 63(3):. PubMed ID: 26931198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of the OLGA and VCM models to erroneous marker placement: effects on 3D-gait kinematics. Groen BE; Geurts M; Nienhuis B; Duysens J Gait Posture; 2012 Mar; 35(3):517-21. PubMed ID: 22245226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and minimal detectable change of gait kinematics in people who are hypermobile. Bates AV; McGregor AH; Alexander CM Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():37-42. PubMed ID: 27004630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of thigh and shank marker quantity on lower extremity kinematics using a constrained model. Slater AA; Hullfish TJ; Baxter JR BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Nov; 19(1):399. PubMed ID: 30424811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of toe marker placement error on joint kinematics and muscle forces using OpenSim gait simulation. Xu H; Merryweather A; Bloswick D; Mao Q; Wang T Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 26 Suppl 1():S685-91. PubMed ID: 26406064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of real-time feedback to improve kinematic marker placement consistency among novice examiners. Macaulay CAJ; Osis ST; Clermont C; Ferber R Gait Posture; 2017 Oct; 58():440-445. PubMed ID: 28910657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of knee marker placement error on evaluation of gait kinematic parameters. Szczerbik E; Kalinowska M Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):43-6. PubMed ID: 22098124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of wearable inertial sensor-based gait analysis system for measurement of spatiotemporal parameters and lower extremity joint kinematics in sagittal plane. Patel G; Mullerpatan R; Agarwal B; Shetty T; Ojha R; Shaikh-Mohammed J; Sujatha S Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 May; 236(5):686-696. PubMed ID: 35001713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can the reliability of three-dimensional running kinematics be improved using functional joint methodology? Pohl MB; Lloyd C; Ferber R Gait Posture; 2010 Oct; 32(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 20732816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]