164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 37309337)
1. Clinical Equivalence of Monoglyde® and Monocryl® Absorbable Poliglecaprone-25 Sutures: A Single-Blind, Randomized Study.
Sailakshmi M; Misra S; Hs S; Acharya S; Moharana AK; Ts D
Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38938. PubMed ID: 37309337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical Equivalence of Polyglycolic Acid Suture and Polyglactin 910 Suture for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blind Randomized Study.
Devi CHRV; Ray R; Koduri S; Moharana AK; Ts D
Med Devices (Auckl); 2023; 16():27-36. PubMed ID: 36741332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Buresch AM; Van Arsdale A; Ferzli M; Sahasrabudhe N; Sun M; Bernstein J; Bernstein PS; Ngai IM; Garry DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Equivalence of Trusynth® and Vicryl® Polyglactin 910 Sutures for Subcutaneous Tissue Closure During Cesarean Delivery: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.
DCunha P; Silpa KP; Gadwalker SM; Moharana AK; Ts D
Cureus; 2023 Jun; 15(6):e39982. PubMed ID: 37416026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Subcuticular Suture Type at Cesarean Delivery and Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sobodu O; Nash CM; Stairs J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2024 Jan; 46(1):102191. PubMed ID: 37595945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Single blind, randomized study comparing clinical equivalence of Trusilk
Balakrishna R; Poojary D; R A; Sali S; Moharana AK; Ts D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():689. PubMed ID: 36128557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical equivalence of Trusynth fast
Hemalatha Devi D; Bolanthakodi C; D'Cunha P; Bheema Bai M; Kumar Moharana A; Ts D
F1000Res; 2022; 11():1179. PubMed ID: 37388624
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized trial between different suture materials (polydioxanone vs. poliglecaprone 25) and different suturing techniques (running subcuticular suture alone vs. with running horizontal mattress) in prevention of hypertrophic scar development in median sternotomy wound.
Homvises B
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Aug; 97 Suppl 8():S88-94. PubMed ID: 25518299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
Odijk R; Hennipman B; Rousian M; Madani K; Dijksterhuis M; de Leeuw JW; van Hof A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):355. PubMed ID: 29037181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial.
Daykan Y; Sharon-Weiner M; Pasternak Y; Tzadikevitch-Geffen K; Markovitch O; Sukenik-Halevy R; Biron-Shental T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):406.e1-406.e5. PubMed ID: 28153666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Subcuticular sutures for skin closure in non-obstetric surgery.
Goto S; Sakamoto T; Ganeko R; Hida K; Furukawa TA; Sakai Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Apr; 4(4):CD012124. PubMed ID: 32271475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Equal cosmetic outcomes with 5-0 poliglecaprone-25 versus 6-0 polypropylene for superficial closures.
Rosenzweig LB; Abdelmalek M; Ho J; Hruza GJ
Dermatol Surg; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1126-9. PubMed ID: 20653727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
